IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/uts/finphd/5-2020.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Does Social Media Sentiment Trump News?

Author

Listed:
  • Baoqing Gan

Abstract

The importance of investor sentiment and its influence on financial market has been widely documented. The majority of these studies, however, are either US-centred or focus on a single source of sentiment. In this thesis, I contrast the effects of news and social media sentiment and assess their impacts on markets around the world, using both daily and intraday textual analytics sentiment from Thomson Reuters MarketPsych Indices (TRMI). In the first chapter, I explore the rapidly changing news and social media landscape and its interplay with market returns and volatility. I find that news media activities (buzz) dominate social media before 2013, while social media has become increasingly important especially after 2016. A similar evolution of lead-lag pattern between news and social media sentiment is also uncovered. Moreover, I discover that market variables exert stronger impact on sentiment than the other way around, and the linkage between volatility and sentiment is more persistent than that between returns and sentiment. The second chapter examines the role of news and social media sentiment in explaining intraday returns. My analysis of the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) constituents reveals that sentiment during non-trading hours is a strong yet short-lived predictor of opening returns. Specifically, sentiment from social media induces larger changes than news media. Negative sentiment effects work at higher economic magnitudes than positive sentiment. Nonetheless, these phenomena quickly diminish after the first minute of trading. Robustness tests show that these effects are not driven by corporate earnings announcements. This chapter provides a new set of techniques and develops a novel framework for high-frequency sentiment analysis. The last chapter applies similar intraday analysis into 14 international markets: Australia, Brazil, Canada, the EU, France, Germany, Hong Kong, India, Japan, Singapore, Spain, Switzerland, the UK and the US. I find that the dominant role of social media in US is not representative of other global markets. News media sentiment expounds a greater impact on stock prices in other major financial markets. Robustness tests show that the aggregation of sentiment up to three hours prior to the market opening helps generate an effective signal for predicting the direction of the opening prices. This chapter underscores the importance of avoiding adopting US evidence naively to other markets. Overall, this thesis contrasts effects of news sentiment with that of social media sentiment. Applying a novel dataset of high-frequency text analytics, this thesis provides an approach to help shed light on the role social media sentiment plays in the dynamics of stock markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Baoqing Gan, 2020. "Does Social Media Sentiment Trump News?," PhD Thesis, Finance Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney, number 5-2020, January-A.
  • Handle: RePEc:uts:finphd:5-2020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/bitstream/10453/149004/2/02whole.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steve Y. Yang & Sheung Yin Kevin Mo & Anqi Liu, 2015. "Twitter financial community sentiment and its predictive relationship to stock market movement," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(10), pages 1637-1656, October.
    2. Paul C. Tetlock & Maytal Saar‐Tsechansky & Sofus Macskassy, 2008. "More Than Words: Quantifying Language to Measure Firms' Fundamentals," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 63(3), pages 1437-1467, June.
    3. Xiong, Xiong & Meng, Yongqiang & Li, Xiao & Shen, Dehua, 2020. "Can overnight return really serve as a proxy for firm-specific investor sentiment? Cross-country evidence," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    4. Ivo Welch, 2022. "Simply Better Market Betas," Critical Finance Review, now publishers, vol. 11(1), pages 37-64, February.
    5. Zou, Hui, 2006. "The Adaptive Lasso and Its Oracle Properties," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 101, pages 1418-1429, December.
    6. Zhou, Guofu, 2010. "How much stock return predictability can we expect from an asset pricing model?," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 108(2), pages 184-186, August.
    7. Sun, Licheng & Najand, Mohammad & Shen, Jiancheng, 2016. "Stock return predictability and investor sentiment: A high-frequency perspective," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 147-164.
    8. Paul C. Tetlock, 2007. "Giving Content to Investor Sentiment: The Role of Media in the Stock Market," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 62(3), pages 1139-1168, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Massimiliano Caporin & Francesco Poli, 2017. "Building News Measures from Textual Data and an Application to Volatility Forecasting," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-46, August.
    2. Renault, Thomas, 2017. "Intraday online investor sentiment and return patterns in the U.S. stock market," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 25-40.
    3. Mokni, Khaled & Bouteska, Ahmed & Nakhli, Mohamed Sahbi, 2022. "Investor sentiment and Bitcoin relationship: A quantile-based analysis," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    4. Guofu Zhou, 2018. "Measuring Investor Sentiment," Annual Review of Financial Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 10(1), pages 239-259, November.
    5. Zeitun, Rami & Rehman, Mobeen Ur & Ahmad, Nasir & Vo, Xuan Vinh, 2023. "The impact of Twitter-based sentiment on US sectoral returns," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    6. Chen, Cathy Yi-Hsuan & Després, Roméo & Guo, Li & Renault, Thomas, 2019. "What makes cryptocurrencies special? Investor sentiment and return predictability during the bubble," IRTG 1792 Discussion Papers 2019-016, Humboldt University of Berlin, International Research Training Group 1792 "High Dimensional Nonstationary Time Series".
    7. John Griffith & Mohammad Najand & Jiancheng Shen, 2020. "Emotions in the Stock Market," Journal of Behavioral Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 42-56, January.
    8. Daniele Ballinari & Simon Behrendt, 2021. "How to gauge investor behavior? A comparison of online investor sentiment measures," Digital Finance, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 169-204, June.
    9. Mariano González-Sánchez & M. Encina Morales de Vega, 2021. "Influence of Bloomberg’s Investor Sentiment Index: Evidence from European Union Financial Sector," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-21, February.
    10. Alomari, Mohammad & Al Rababa’a, Abdel Razzaq & El-Nader, Ghaith & Alkhataybeh, Ahmad & Ur Rehman, Mobeen, 2021. "Examining the effects of news and media sentiments on volatility and correlation: Evidence from the UK," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 280-297.
    11. David E. Allen & Michael McAleer & Abhay K. Singh, 2019. "Daily market news sentiment and stock prices," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(30), pages 3212-3235, June.
    12. Yan Luo & Linying Zhou, 2020. "Textual tone in corporate financial disclosures: a survey of the literature," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(2), pages 101-110, September.
    13. Kamaladdin Fataliyev & Aneesh Chivukula & Mukesh Prasad & Wei Liu, 2021. "Stock Market Analysis with Text Data: A Review," Papers 2106.12985, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2021.
    14. André Betzer & Jan Philipp Harries, 2022. "How online discussion board activity affects stock trading: the case of GameStop," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 36(4), pages 443-472, December.
    15. Michael J. Seiler & David M. Harrison, 2011. "Perceived Versus Actual Susceptibility to Normative Influence in the Presence of Defaulting Landlords," Review of Behavioral Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 3(2), pages 55-77, September.
    16. Caporale, Guglielmo Maria & Spagnolo, Fabio & Spagnolo, Nicola, 2016. "Macro news and stock returns in the Euro area: A VAR-GARCH-in-mean analysis," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 180-188.
    17. Leilane de Freitas Rocha Cambara & Roberto Meurer, 2023. "News sentiment and foreign portfolio investment in Brazil," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(3), pages 3332-3348, July.
    18. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/3mgbd73vkp9f9oje7utooe7vpg is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Yang-Cheng Lu & Yu-Chen Wei, 2013. "The Chinese News Sentiment around Earnings Announcements," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(3), pages 44-58, October.
    20. Ahmed, Yousry & Elshandidy, Tamer, 2016. "The effect of bidder conservatism on M&A decisions: Text-based evidence from US 10-K filings," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 176-190.
    21. Liebmann, Michael & Orlov, Alexei G. & Neumann, Dirk, 2016. "The tone of financial news and the perceptions of stock and CDS traders," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 159-175.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uts:finphd:5-2020. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Duncan Ford (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sfutsau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.