IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/elg/eebook/13602.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

The Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurship in Agriculture and Rural Development

Editor

Listed:
  • Gry Agnete Alsos
  • Sara Carter
  • Elisabet Ljunggren
  • Friederike Welter

Abstract

The agriculture sector around the world has experienced profound changes in recent years. This unique and path-breaking Handbook draws together the best current research in the area of entrepreneurship in agriculture, food production and rural development.

Individual chapters are listed in the "Chapters" tab

Suggested Citation

  • Gry Agnete Alsos & Sara Carter & Elisabet Ljunggren & Friederike Welter (ed.), 2011. "The Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurship in Agriculture and Rural Development," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13602.
    • Handle: RePEc:elg:eebook:13602
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.elgaronline.com/view/9781848446250.xml
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sarah Fitz-Koch & Mattias Nordqvist & Sara Carter & Erik Hunter, 2018. "Entrepreneurship in the Agricultural Sector: A Literature Review and Future Research Opportunities," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 42(1), pages 129-166, January.
    2. Ryohei Yamashita, 2021. "Saving tradition in Japan: a case study of local opinions regarding urban university students’ participation in rural festivals," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 125-147, February.
    3. Gry Agnete Alsos & Sara Carter & Elisabet Ljunggren, 2013. "Entrepreneurial families and households," Research Papers 0010, Enterprise Research Centre.
    4. Alexandra PLIAKOURA, 2022. "Accepting the challenges of agricultural entrepreneurship and management development research: a viewpoint," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 13(4), pages 418-436, January.
    5. Colin Mason & Ross Brown, 2013. "Creating good public policy to support high-growth firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 211-225, February.
    6. Tarja Niemelä, 2015. "Farm Entrepreneurs’ Intentions to Develop Pluriactive Business Activities in Finland," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 11(3), pages 117-141.
    7. Tarja Niemelä & Reija Häkkinen, 2014. "The Role of Pluriactivity for Continuity and Survival in Family Farm Firms," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 10(4), pages 7-43.
    8. Katia A. Figueroa-Rodríguez & María del Carmen Álvarez-Ávila & Fabiola Hernández Castillo & Rita Schwentesius Rindermann & Benjamín Figueroa-Sandoval, 2019. "Farmers’ Market Actors, Dynamics, and Attributes: A Bibliometric Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, January.
    9. Trevor Jones & Monder Ram, 2013. "Entrepreneurship as ethnic minority liberation," Research Papers 0011, Enterprise Research Centre.
    10. Elisa Maini & Marcello De Rosa & Yari Vecchio, 2021. "The Role of Education in the Transition towards Sustainable Agriculture: A Family Farm Learning Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-11, July.
    11. Anna-Leena Asikainen & Giovanni Mangiarotti, 2017. "Open innovation and growth in IT sector," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 11(1), pages 45-68, March.
    12. Ross Brown & Colin Mason, 2012. "Raising the batting average: Re-orientating regional industrial policy to generate more high growth firms," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 27(1), pages 33-49, February.
    13. repec:cha:ysa001:v:7:y:2014:i:1:p:11-20 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Somayeh Tohidyan Far & Kurosh Rezaei-Moghaddam, 2019. "Multifunctional agriculture: an approach for entrepreneurship development of agricultural sector," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 9(1), pages 1-23, December.
    15. Temidayo Gabriel Apata, 2015. "Entrepreneurship Processes and Small Farms Achievements: Empirical Analysis of Linkage," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 11(2), pages 105-126.
    16. Gary Bosworth, 2011. "Motivations for moving among Commercial Counterurbanisers," ERSA conference papers ersa11p1662, European Regional Science Association.
    17. Tóth-Pajor, Ákos & Farkas, Richárd, 2017. "A vállalkozói ökoszisztémák térbeli megjelenésének modellezési lehetőségei - tények és problémák [Scope for modelling entrepreneurial ecosystems: facts and problems]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(2), pages 123-139.
    18. Nicola Gindele & Susanne Kaps & Reiner Doluschitz, 2015. "Strukturelle Veränderungen in der Landwirtschaft – Reaktion der landwirtschaftlichen Betriebsleiter sowie ableitbare Konsequenzen für den Landwirt als Unternehmer," Journal of Socio-Economics in Agriculture (Until 2015: Yearbook of Socioeconomics in Agriculture), Swiss Society for Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, vol. 8(1), pages 11-20.
    19. Louise Manning & Robert Smith & Gillian Conley & Luke Halsey, 2020. "Ecopreneurial Education and Support: Developing the Innovators of Today and Tomorrow," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-19, November.
    20. Claudia Dias & Ricardo Gouveia Rodrigues & João J. Ferreira, 2021. "Small agricultural businesses' performance—What is the role of dynamic capabilities, entrepreneurial orientation, and environmental sustainability commitment?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 1898-1912, May.
    21. Izabela Kwil & Katarzyna Piwowar-Sulej & Małgorzata Krzywonos, 2020. "Local Entrepreneurship in the Context of Food Production: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, January.
    22. Merli Reidolf & Martin Graffenberger, 2019. "How local resources shape innovation and path development in rural regions. Insights from rural Estonia," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 15(3), pages 131-162.

    Book Chapters

    The following chapters of this book are listed in IDEAS

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Business and Management; Development Studies; Economics and Finance; Environment;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O1 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:elg:eebook:13602. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Darrel McCalla (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.e-elgar.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.