IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/ces/ifobei/1.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Prospects and limits of federal competition

Author

Listed:
  • Christian Baretti
  • Robert Fenge
  • Bernd Huber
  • Willi Leibfritz
  • Matthias Steinherr

Abstract

The structure German fiscal federalism is subject of the study. It describes the extent to which the concept of federal competition can be implemented in a system that up to has had a largely co-operative orientation. The study examines both the relationship between the federal government and the Länder and that of the Länder among themselves. It looks especially at the economic conditions that must be fulfilled so that federal competition does not lead to a permanent widening of the gap between Länder. The study examines the fiscal equalisation system, the current division of responsibilities among the federal, Länder and municipal levels as well as the prospects for an independent tax policy of the Länder. The analysis is based on the theory of fiscal federalism, on the experience of other federal systems (USA, Canada, Switzerland) as well as on empirical analyses (regressions of panel data, descriptive evaluations, etc.).

Suggested Citation

  • Christian Baretti & Robert Fenge & Bernd Huber & Willi Leibfritz & Matthias Steinherr, 2000. "Prospects and limits of federal competition," ifo Beiträge zur Wirtschaftsforschung, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 1.
    • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifobei:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lars P. Feld, 2004. "Le fédéralisme financier en Allemagne: Coopération ou concurrence?," Marburg Working Papers on Economics 200416, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    2. Baretti, Christian & Huber, Bernd & Lichtblau, Karl, 2001. "Die Reform des Finanzausgleichs im Spannungsfeld zwischen ökonomischer Rationalität und Besitzstandsdenken," IW-Trends – Vierteljahresschrift zur empirischen Wirtschaftsforschung, Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft (IW) / German Economic Institute, vol. 28(2), pages 38-58.
    3. Helmle, S., 2006. "Thesen zur Vorstellungen und zur Kommunikation über Landwirtschaft," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 41, March.
    4. Christian Baretti, 2002. "Wird gute Standortpolitik bestraft? Die Anreizeffekte des kommunalen Finanzsystems," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 55(07), pages 10-16, April.
    5. Kitterer, Wolfgang, 2002. "Die Ausgestaltung der Mittelzuweisungen im Solidarpakt II," FiFo Discussion Papers - Finanzwissenschaftliche Diskussionsbeiträge 02-1, University of Cologne, FiFo Institute for Public Economics.
    6. Christian Baretti & Bernd Huber & Karl Lichtblau, 2001. "Das Maßstäbegesetz auf dem Prüfstand," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 54(11), pages 12-20, October.
    7. Konrad, Kai A. & Seitz, Helmut, 2001. "Fiscal federalism and risk sharing in Germany: the role of size differences [Risikokonsolidierung im Rahmen des deutschen Länderfinanzausgleichs: die Rolle von Größenunterschieden]," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Processes and Governance FS IV 01-20, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C23 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Models with Panel Data; Spatio-temporal Models
    • H72 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - State and Local Budget and Expenditures
    • H77 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - Intergovernmental Relations; Federalism
    • O47 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - Empirical Studies of Economic Growth; Aggregate Productivity; Cross-Country Output Convergence

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifobei:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.