IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/znm/journl/v50y2021i2p109-121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Products offered by a startup and the quality of human life

Author

Listed:
  • WiesEaw EukasiEski

    (Cracow University of Economics, Poland)

  • Angelika Nigbor-DroE

    (Cracow University of Economics, Poland)

Abstract

The development of modern economies is determined by many factors. One of the most important is the use of the new technologies and in-novations, which at the same time enable the introduction of solutions in the field of Industry 4.0. The form of organization oriented towards innovative solutions is a startup. The aim of the article is to show the relationship be-tween the product offered by a startup and the quality of human life. It is im-portant how and on what levels startups function in todayb

Suggested Citation

  • WiesEaw EukasiEski & Angelika Nigbor-DroE, 2021. "Products offered by a startup and the quality of human life," Zeszyty Naukowe Małopolskiej Wyższej Szkoły Ekonomicznej w Tarnowie / The Malopolska School of Economics in Tarnow Research Papers Collection, Malopolska School of Economics in Tarnow, vol. 50(2), pages 109-121, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:znm:journl:v:50:y:2021:i:2:p:109-121
    DOI: 10.25944/znmwse.2021.02.109121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://zn.mwse.edu.pl/index.php/zn/article/view/796
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.25944/znmwse.2021.02.109121?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paola Paoloni & Giuseppe Modaffari, 2018. "Female-Owned Innovative Startups in Italy: Status Quo and Implications," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-31, October.
    2. A.A. Chursin & V.V. Strenalyuk, 2018. "Synergy Effect in Innovative Activities and its Accounting in the Technological Competencies of an Enterprise," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 151-161.
    3. Panagiotis Tsolakidis & Naoum Mylonas & Eugenia Petridou, 2020. "The Impact of Imitation Strategies, Managerial and Entrepreneurial Skills on Startups’ Entrepreneurial Innovation," Economies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-17, October.
    4. repec:ers:journl:v:volumexxi:y:2018:i:issue4:p:151-161 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Oana Bărbulescu & Cristinel Petrişor Constantin, 2019. "Sustainable Growth Approaches: Quadruple Helix Approach for Turning Brașov into a Startup City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-19, November.
    6. Hall, Jeremy K. & Daneke, Gregory A. & Lenox, Michael J., 2010. "Sustainable development and entrepreneurship: Past contributions and future directions," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 439-448, September.
    7. Renato Passaro & Ivana Quinto & Pierluigi Rippa & Antonio Thomas, 2020. "Evolution of Collaborative Networks Supporting Startup Sustainability: Evidences from Digital Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-20, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oana Bărbulescu & Cristina Nicolau & Daniel Munteanu, 2021. "Within the Entrepreneurship Ecosystem: Is Innovation Clusters’ Strategic Approach Boosting Businesses’ Sustainable Development?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Jim Andersén, 2023. "Green resource orchestration: A critical appraisal of the use of resource orchestration in environmental management research, and a research agenda for future study," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5506-5520, December.
    3. I Wayan Ruspendi Junaedi & I Wayan Damayana & Dermawan Waruwu & I Gusti Bagus Rai Utama, 2020. "Social Enterprises through Traditional Cooperation: Love, Joint Responsibility, Portfolio, and Wellbeing," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 12(1), pages 333-346, October.
    4. Muñoz, Pablo & Cohen, Boyd, 2017. "Towards a social-ecological understanding of sustainable venturing," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 7(C), pages 1-8.
    5. Ferreira, Joao J. & Fernandes, Cristina I. & Veiga, Pedro Mota & Caputo, Andrea, 2022. "The interactions of entrepreneurial attitudes, abilities and aspirations in the (twin) environmental and digital transitions? A dynamic panel data approach," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    6. Mendez-Picazo, María-Teresa & Galindo-Martin, Miguel-Angel & Perez-Pujol, Rafael-Sergio, 2024. "Direct and indirect effects of digital transformation on sustainable development in pre- and post-pandemic periods," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    7. Andreas Kuckertz, 2020. "Bioeconomy Transformation Strategies Worldwide Require Stronger Focus on Entrepreneurship," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-8, April.
    8. Iftikhar Hussain & Mehrab Nazir & Saadia Bano Hashmi & Assunta Di Vaio & Imrab Shaheen & Muhammad Arfaq Waseem & Adeel Arshad, 2021. "Green and Sustainable Entrepreneurial Intentions: A Mediation-Moderation Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-13, August.
    9. Céline Bérard & Christelle Bruyere & Séverine Saleilles, 2015. "Sustainability-driven and high-growth SMEs: A paradox approach [Las PYME de sostenibilidad impulsada y el alto crecimiento: Un enfoque por las paradojas]," Post-Print halshs-01354704, HAL.
    10. João M. S. Carvalho & Célio A. A. Sousa, 2018. "Is Psychological Value a Missing Building Block in Societal Sustainability?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-14, December.
    11. Lingyan Meng & Md Qamruzzaman & Anass Hamad Elneel Adow, 2021. "Technological Adaption and Open Innovation in SMEs: An Strategic Assessment for Women-Owned SMEs Sustainability in Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-22, March.
    12. Marc Dressler, 2023. "Generic strategic profiling of entrepreneurial SMEs – environmentalism as hygiene factor," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 121-150, March.
    13. Maiti, Moinak, 2022. "Does development in venture capital investments influence green growth?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    14. Régis Y. Chenavaz & Alexandra Couston & Stéphanie Heichelbech & Isabelle Pignatel & Stanko Dimitrov, 2023. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Entrepreneurial Ventures: A Conceptual Framework and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-30, May.
    15. Elżbieta Izabela Szczepankiewicz & Jan Fazlagić & Windham Loopesko, 2021. "A Conceptual Model for Developing Climate Education in Sustainability Management Education System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-26, January.
    16. Gholamhossein Hosseininia & Ali Ramezani, 2016. "Factors Influencing Sustainable Entrepreneurship in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Iran: A Case Study of Food Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-20, October.
    17. Evita Milana & Frank Ulrich, 2022. "Do open innovation practices in firms promote sustainability?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1718-1732, December.
    18. Omri, Anis, 2018. "Entrepreneurship, sectoral outputs and environmental improvement: International evidence," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 46-55.
    19. Hokey Min & Yohannes Haile, 2021. "Examining the Role of Disruptive Innovation in Renewable Energy Businesses from a Cross National Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, July.
    20. Chen, Chih Cheng, 2014. "Entrepreneurship, Economic Growth, And Employment : A Case Study Of Taiwan," Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, Hitotsubashi University, vol. 55(1), pages 71-88, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    startup; quality of life; innovative product;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O3 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:znm:journl:v:50:y:2021:i:2:p:109-121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lidia Matuszewska (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mwsetpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.