IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zna/indecs/v17y2019i3-bp640-658.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Subjectivity and Technology in Work of Technicians in Periodical Technical Inspection Stations

Author

Listed:
  • Niksa Dubreta

    (University of Zagreb, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering & Naval Architecture, Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Iva Mikulic

    (Centre for Vehicles of Croatia, Zagreb, Croatia)

Abstract

The article deals with the subjectivity-technology theme and is based on qualitative study of technologically highly mediated technicians' work in two stations for periodical technical inspection of vehicles in Croatia. Specifically, it is studied how supervisors for periodical technical inspection of vehicles interpret the place and importance of their subjective judgements in contrast to technologically driven advancement of devices they use in everyday work activities. The main concepts guiding the analysis stems from the organizational research on work and technology according to which human beings act toward things on the basis of the meanings that things have for them. Other concepts included structural aspect of technicians' professional identity and work autonomy, organizational contingencies and social interactions as integral part of technical work. Four descriptively based themes emerged through the procedure of summing up the findings. They suggest strong and enduring intertwining of human factor and technology in contingent organizational context. Findings suggest that subjective judgements are regarded as necessary human activity permanently related to simultaneous use of devices in the process of inspection where recognizing complex task related appearances, and spotting unusual events are integral part of work. Finally, interactional patterns suggested communications as the integral part of the job, often as the most difficult, stressful but simultaneously indispensable condition for work to be done correctly.

Suggested Citation

  • Niksa Dubreta & Iva Mikulic, 2019. "Subjectivity and Technology in Work of Technicians in Periodical Technical Inspection Stations," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 17(3-B), pages 640-658.
  • Handle: RePEc:zna:indecs:v:17:y:2019:i:3-b:p:640-658
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://indecs.eu/2019/indecs2019-pp640-658.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lin Wu & Nachiappan Subramanian & Muhammad D. Abdulrahman & Chang Liu & Kee-hung Lai & Kulwant S. Pawar, 2015. "The Impact of Integrated Practices of Lean, Green, and Social Management Systems on Firm Sustainability Performance—Evidence from Chinese Fashion Auto-Parts Suppliers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-21, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mai Mostafa Awad & Abd‘Elazez Hashem & Hend Mohamed Naguib, 2022. "The Impact of Lean Management Practices on Economic Sustainability in Services Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-27, July.
    2. Ifeoluwa Elemure & Hom Nath Dhakal & Michel Leseure & Jovana Radulovic, 2023. "Integration of Lean Green and Sustainability in Manufacturing: A Review on Current State and Future Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-25, June.
    3. Zhou, Honggeng & Li, Ling, 2020. "The impact of supply chain practices and quality management on firm performance: Evidence from China's small and medium manufacturing enterprises," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    4. Wadhah Abualfaraa & Mohammed AlManei & Rashmeet Kaur & Ahmed Al-Ashaab & Patrick McLaughlin & Konstantinos Salonitis, 2022. "A Synergetic Framework for Green and Lean Manufacturing Practices in SMEs: Saudi Arabia Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-33, December.
    5. Sasha Shahbazi & Martin Kurdve & Mats Zackrisson & Christina Jönsson & Anna Runa Kristinsdottir, 2019. "Comparison of Four Environmental Assessment Tools in Swedish Manufacturing: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-19, April.
    6. Chia-Nan Wang & Ying-Fang Huang & Thi-Nham Le & Thanh-Tuan Ta, 2016. "An Innovative Approach to Enhancing the Sustainable Development of Japanese Automobile Suppliers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-19, April.
    7. Pedro Teixeira & Arnaldo Coelho & Pedro Fontoura & José Carlos Sá & Francisco J. G. Silva & Gilberto Santos & Luis P. Ferreira, 2022. "Combining lean and green practices to achieve a superior performance: The contribution for a sustainable development and competitiveness—An empirical study on the Portuguese context," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(4), pages 887-903, July.
    8. Szász, Levente & Csíki, Ottó & Rácz, Béla-Gergely, 2021. "Sustainability management in the global automotive industry: A theoretical model and survey study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    9. Liu, Fuzhen & He, Chaocheng & Lai, Kee-hung, 2024. "Market reaction to responsible production practices adoption: The role of firm size and financial slack," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    10. Tsan-Ming Choi & Yongjian Li, 2015. "Sustainability in Fashion Business Operations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-7, November.
    11. Wilson Kosasih & I Nyoman Pujawan & Putu Dana Karningsih, 2023. "Integrated Lean-Green Practices and Supply Chain Sustainability for Manufacturing SMEs: A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-28, August.
    12. Che Wan Jasimah Bt Wan Mohamed Radzi & Hashem Salarzadeh Jenatabadi & Maisarah Binti Hasbullah, 2015. "Firm Sustainability Performance Index Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-17, December.
    13. Miro Hegedic & Mihael Gudlin & Nedeljko Stefanic, 2018. "Interrelation of Lean and Green Management in Croatian Manufacturing Companies," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 16(1), pages 21-39.
    14. Assadej Vanichchinchai, 2019. "The Effect of Lean Manufacturing on a Supply Chain Relationship and Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-15, October.
    15. Cagatay Tasdemir & Rado Gazo, 2018. "A Systematic Literature Review for Better Understanding of Lean Driven Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-54, July.
    16. Idoya Ferrero-Ferrero & María Ángeles Fernández-Izquierdo & María Jesús Muñoz-Torres, 2016. "The Effect of Environmental, Social and Governance Consistency on Economic Results," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-16, October.
    17. Witness Siwela & Collins C. Ngwakwe, 2024. "The Relationship between Corporate Environmental Performance and Suppliers' Credit Lending," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 1, pages 66-83, March.
    18. Fatima Ezzahra Essaber & Rachid Benmoussa & Roland De Guio & Sébastien Dubois, 2021. "A Hybrid Supply Chain Risk Management Approach for Lean Green Performance Based on AHP, RCA and TRIZ: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-41, July.
    19. Yousif Munadhil Ibrahim & Norsiah Hami & Siti Norezam Othman, 2019. "Integrating Sustainable Maintenance into Sustainable Manufacturing Practices and its Relationship with Sustainability Performance: A Conceptual Framework," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(4), pages 30-39.
    20. Minna Saunila & Juhani Ukko & Jorma Kinnunen, 2024. "Sustainability partnership as a moderator in the relationship between business sustainability and firm competitiveness," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 123-133, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    subjective judgements; devices; technicians; communications;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L84 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Personal, Professional, and Business Services

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zna:indecs:v:17:y:2019:i:3-b:p:640-658. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Josip Stepanic (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.