IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zib/zbnees/v5y2021i1p10-14.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Issues In Environmental Protection Agency And Recommendations To Solve The Problems

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Sakandar Majid

    (Department of Zoology, Wildlife, and Fisheries, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan)

  • Saba Malik

    (Department of Zoology, Wildlife, and Fisheries, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan)

  • Sidra Mumtaz

    (Department of Zoology, Wildlife, and Fisheries, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan)

  • Sana Akhtar

    (Department of Zoology, Wildlife, and Fisheries, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan)

  • Iqra Zahoor

    (Department of Zoology, Wildlife, and Fisheries, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan)

  • Soha Kanwal

    (Department of Zoology, Wildlife, and Fisheries, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan)

  • Mubbra Habib

    (Department of Zoology, Wildlife, and Fisheries, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan)

  • Mehmood Ahmed Husnain Hashmi

    (Department of Zoology, Wildlife, and Fisheries, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study is to explore the environmental protection agency (EPA) issues and also suggest solutions that will help to solve these issues. Method: We have used an analysis method for our study. We used the environmental protection agency (EPA) website, report, and previously published reports to evaluate issues. Results: Our results show that the environmental protection agency (EPA) has issues in workload and also in information security. We analyze both issues deeply and recommend some changes to the environmental protection agency (EPA) which includes a pilot project, a staffing plan for the entire department, measurements of the security, and tracking of the environmental protection agency (EPA) framework. Conclusion: From the whole analyses we conclude that the environmental protection agency (EPA) and office of inspectors general need to focus on that issue. There is a need for them to improve the problems that occur in such policies that are designed to save the atmosphere and human health.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Sakandar Majid & Saba Malik & Sidra Mumtaz & Sana Akhtar & Iqra Zahoor & Soha Kanwal & Mubbra Habib & Mehmood Ahmed Husnain Hashmi, 2020. "Issues In Environmental Protection Agency And Recommendations To Solve The Problems," Environment & Ecosystem Science (EES), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 5(1), pages 10-14, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:zib:zbnees:v:5:y:2021:i:1:p:10-14
    DOI: 10.26480/ees.01.2021.10.14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://environecosystem.com/download/14720/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26480/ees.01.2021.10.14?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olden, K., 2018. "The EPA: Time to re-invent environmental protection," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 108(4), pages 454-456.
    2. Nweke, O.C. & Payne-Sturges, D. & Garcia, L. & Lee, C. & Zenick, H. & Grevatt, P. & Sanders III, W.H. & Case, H. & Dankwa-Mullan, I., 2011. "Symposium on integrating the science of environmental justice into decision-making at the Environmental Protection Agency: An overview," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 101(SUPPL. 1), pages 19-26.
    3. Jorge A. Romero & Martin Freedman & Neale G. O'Connor, 2018. "The impact of Environmental Protection Agency penalties on financial performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1733-1740, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khine Kyaw & Mojisola Olugbode & Barbara Petracci, 2022. "Stakeholder engagement: Investors' environmental risk aversion and corporate earnings," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 1220-1231, March.
    2. Mudeer Ahmed Khattak & Buerhan Saiti, 2021. "Banks' environmental policy and business outcomes: The role of competition," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 302-317, January.
    3. Devon C. Payne-Sturges & Madeleine K. Scammell & Jonathan I. Levy & Deborah A. Cory-Slechta & Elaine Symanski & Jessie L. Carr Shmool & Robert Laumbach & Stephen Linder & Jane E. Clougherty, 2018. "Methods for Evaluating the Combined Effects of Chemical and Nonchemical Exposures for Cumulative Environmental Health Risk Assessment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-21, December.
    4. Margarita Robaina & Mara Madaleno, 2020. "The relationship between emissions reduction and financial performance: Are Portuguese companies in a sustainable development path?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3), pages 1213-1226, May.
    5. Kuo Zhou & Xianghui Jin & Xinru Li & Yunqing Tao, 2024. "Enhancing sustainable development through effective disclosure: Corporate environmental performance and readability," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 274-291, January.
    6. Yuqin Jiao & Julie K. Bower & Wansoo Im & Nicholas Basta & John Obrycki & Mohammad Z. Al-Hamdan & Allison Wilder & Claire E. Bollinger & Tongwen Zhang & Luddie Sr. Hatten & Jerrie Hatten & Darryl B. H, 2015. "Application of Citizen Science Risk Communication Tools in a Vulnerable Urban Community," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, December.
    7. İbrahim Topal & Sima Nart & Cüneyt Akar & Alptekin Erkollar, 2020. "The effect of greenwashing on online consumer engagement: A comparative study in France, Germany, Turkey, and the United Kingdom," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 465-480, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zib:zbnees:v:5:y:2021:i:1:p:10-14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Zibeline International Publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://environecosystem.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.