IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/iprjir/249992.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Data justice

Author

Listed:
  • Dencik, Lina
  • Sanchez-Monedero, Javier

Abstract

Data justice has emerged as a key framework for engaging with the intersection of datafication and society in a way that privileges an explicit concern with social justice. Engaging with justice concerns in the analysis of information and communication systems is not in itself new, but the concept of data justice has been used to denote a shift in understanding of what is at stake with datafication beyond digital rights. In this essay, we trace the lineage and outline some of the different traditions and approaches through which the concept is currently finding expression. We argue that in doing so, we are confronted with tensions that denote a politics of data justice both in terms of what is at stake with datafication and what might be suitable responses.

Suggested Citation

  • Dencik, Lina & Sanchez-Monedero, Javier, 2021. "Data justice," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:iprjir:249992
    DOI: 10.14763/2022.1.1615
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/249992/1/1788807898.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.14763/2022.1.1615?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. De Stefano, Valerio., 2018. ""Negotiating the algorithm" automation, artificial intelligence and labour protection," ILO Working Papers 994998792302676, International Labour Organization.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alex J. Wood, 2021. "Algorithmic Management: Consequences for Work Organisation and Working Conditions," JRC Working Papers on Labour, Education and Technology 2021-07, Joint Research Centre.
    2. Antonio ALOISI & Valerio DE STEFANO, 2020. "Regulation and the future of work: The employment relationship as an innovation facilitator," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 159(1), pages 47-69, March.
    3. Matteo Turrin, 2022. "Relazioni industriali e nuove tecnologie: conflitto, partecipazione e concertazione nell?era del lavoro digitale," ECONOMIA E SOCIET? REGIONALE, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(3), pages 55-70.
    4. Hamid R. EKBIA & Bonnie A. NARDI, 2019. "Keynes's grandchildren and Marx's gig workers: Why human labour still matters," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 158(4), pages 653-676, December.
    5. Ake Okechukwu, 2021. "A Theoretical Appraise of the Rights of Human and Robots in the Emerging Nigerian Industrial Environment," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 5(10), pages 727-735, October.
    6. Moore, Phoebe V., 2019. "The mirror for (artificial) intelligence: Working in whose reflection?," Discussion Papers, Research Group Globalization, Work, and Production SP III 2019-302, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    7. Helen M. Rand & Hanne M. Stegeman, 2023. "Navigating and resisting platform affordances: Online sex work as digital labor," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(6), pages 2102-2118, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:iprjir:249992. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://policyreview.info/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.