IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/espost/268198.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Renderings: Bildwelten zur Legitimation von spekulativen Stadtentwicklungsprojekten in Lagos und New York
[Renderings. Visual worlds for the legitimization of speculative urban development projects]

Author

Listed:
  • Mélix, Sophie

Abstract

Renderings tragen im Kontext des spekulativen Urbanismus wesentlich zur Legitimation von Stadtentwicklungsprojekten bei. Der Beitrag erläutert, wie mithilfe dieser Form der digitalen Architekturvisualisierung umfassende Bildwelten innerhalb der jeweiligen Planungsprozesse entstehen und wie sie wirkmächtig werden. Am Beispiel der beiden großmaßstäblichen Stadtentwicklungsprojekte Eko Atlantic in Lagos (Nigeria) und Hudson Yards in New York (USA) zeigt sich, wie durch den Einsatz von Renderings imaginäre Räume entstehen, die symbolischen Mehrwert für die geplanten Projekte schaffen: durch fotorealistische, aus digitalen Bildelementen zusammengestellte Renderings sowie eine stark homogenisierte Bildproduktion mit lokalen Anpassungen, die innerhalb der Planungsprozesse eine hohe Eigendynamik entwickelt. So wird die Vision einer bruchlosen und vorhersehbaren Zukunft erzeugt und potenzielle Konflikte werden visuell eingeebnet. Dies verdeckt den imaginären Charakter der Bildwelten – und damit auch ihre spekulative Funktion im Planungsprozess. Es wird diskutiert, wie diese Ambivalenz produktiv gemacht werden kann, um eine größere Vielfalt von Zukunftsvisionen in Planungsprozessen abzubilden.

Suggested Citation

  • Mélix, Sophie, 2022. "Renderings: Bildwelten zur Legitimation von spekulativen Stadtentwicklungsprojekten in Lagos und New York [Renderings. Visual worlds for the legitimization of speculative urban development projects," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 97-126.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:268198
    DOI: 10.36900/suburban.v10i1.595
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/268198/1/document.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.36900/suburban.v10i1.595?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patsy Healey, 2013. "Circuits of Knowledge and Techniques: The Transnational Flow of Planning Ideas and Practices," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(5), pages 1510-1526, September.
    2. Beckert, Jens, 2011. "Imagined futures. Fictionality in economic action," MPIfG Discussion Paper 11/8, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    3. repec:idq:ictduk:13889 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Tom Goodfellow, 2017. "Urban Fortunes and Skeleton Cityscapes: Real Estate and Late Urbanization in Kigali and Addis Ababa," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(5), pages 786-803, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Enora Robin & Frances Brill, 2018. "The global politics of an urban age: creating 'cities for all' in the age of financialisation," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 1-5, December.
    2. Gabriella Y. Carolini, 2021. "Aid’s urban footprint and its implications for local inequality and governance," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(2), pages 389-409, March.
    3. Hanna Hilbrandt & Monika Grubbauer, 2020. "Standards and SSOs in the contested widening and deepening of financial markets: The arrival of Green Municipal Bonds in Mexico City," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(7), pages 1415-1433, October.
    4. Tom Gillespie, 2020. "The Real Estate Frontier," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(4), pages 599-616, July.
    5. I-Chun Catherine Chang, 2017. "Failure matters: Reassembling eco-urbanism in a globalizing China," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(8), pages 1719-1742, August.
    6. Seth Schindler & Jonathan Silver, 2019. "Florida in the Global South: How Eurocentrism Obscures Global Urban Challenges—and What We Can Do about It," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(4), pages 794-805, July.
    7. Jennifer Robinson & Katia Attuyer, 2021. "Extracting Value, London Style: Revisiting the Role of the State in Urban Development," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(2), pages 303-331, March.
    8. Csilla Bartucz & Edit Süle & Adrián Horváth, 2025. "Cognitive-Biased Decision on Courier Express Parcel Market and the Effect of Narratives," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-22, February.
    9. Shakirah Esmail Hudani, 2020. "The Green Masterplan: Crisis, State Transition and Urban Transformation in Post‐Genocide Rwanda," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(4), pages 673-690, July.
    10. Mengzhu Zhang & Si Qiao & Xiang Yan, 2021. "The secondary circuit of capital and the making of the suburban property boom in postcrisis Chinese cities," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(6), pages 1331-1355, September.
    11. Joshua Evans & Jeffrey R Masuda, 2020. "Mobilizing a fast policy fix: Exploring the translation of 10-year plans to end homelessness in Alberta, Canada," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 38(3), pages 503-521, May.
    12. Murphy James T., 2022. "Urban-economic geographies beyond production: Nairobi’s sociotechnical system and the challenge of generative urbanization," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 66(1), pages 18-35, May.
    13. Yu Zhou, 2021. "Qujing (å –ç» ) as policy mobility with Chinese characteristics: A case study of ultralow-energy building policy in China," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(2), pages 410-427, March.
    14. Robert Home, 2021. "History and Prospects for African Land Governance: Institutions, Technology and ‘Land Rights for All’," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    15. Gabriela Christmann & Ajit Singh & Jörg Stollmann & Christoph Bernhardt, 2020. "Visual Communication in Urban Design and Planning: The Impact of Mediatisation(s) on the Construction of Urban Futures," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(2), pages 1-9.
    16. Ian R. Cook, 2015. "Policy Mobilities and Interdisciplinary Engagement," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 835-837, July.
    17. Enora Robin & Laura Nkula-Wenz, 2021. "Beyond the success/failure of travelling urban models: Exploring the politics of time and performance in Cape Town’s East City," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(6), pages 1252-1273, September.
    18. Ivan Turok, 2019. "Cities as platforms for progress: Local drivers of Rwanda’s success," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 34(3), pages 221-227, May.
    19. Håvard Haarstad & Stina Ellevseth Oseland, 2017. "Historicizing Urban Sustainability: The Shifting Ideals Behind Forus Industrial Park, Norway," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(5), pages 838-854, September.
    20. Andrew Harris & Susan Moore, 2013. "Planning Histories and Practices of Circulating Urban Knowledge," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(5), pages 1499-1509, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:268198. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.