IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/espost/179512.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender equality in German universities: vernacularising the battle for the best brains

Author

Listed:
  • Zippel, Kathrin S.
  • Ferree, Myra Marx
  • Zimmermann, Karin

Abstract

We examine how global pressures for competitiveness and gender equality have merged into a discourse of ‘inclusive excellence’ in the twenty-first century and shaped three recent German higher education programmes. After placing these programmes in the larger discourse about gender inequalities, we focus on how they adapt current global concerns about both being ‘the best’ and increasing ‘gender equality’ in locally specific ways, a process called vernacularisation. German equality advocates used ‘meeting international standards’ as leverage, drew on self-governance norms among universities, used formal gender plans as mechanisms to direct change, and set up competition to legitimate intervention. This specific incremental policy path for increasing women's status in German universities also mobilised the national funding agency and local gender equality officers as key actors, and placed particular emphasis on family friendliness as the expression of organisational commitment to gender equality.

Suggested Citation

  • Zippel, Kathrin S. & Ferree, Myra Marx & Zimmermann, Karin, 2016. "Gender equality in German universities: vernacularising the battle for the best brains," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 28(7), pages 867-885.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:179512
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/179512/1/f-20302-full-text-Zippel-et_al-Gender-v2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maria Caprile & Elisabetta Addis & Cecilia Castaño & I Klinge & M. Larios & Danièle Meulders & J. Muller & Sile Padraigin O'Dorchai & M. Palasik & Robert Plasman & S. Roivas & F. Sagebiel & Londa Schi, 2012. "Meta-analysis gender and science research: Synthesis report," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/135749, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrea Löther, 2019. "Is It Working? An Impact Evaluation of the German “Women Professors Program”," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Lisa Unangst & Ana M. Martínez Alemán, 2021. "Coloniality in the German Higher Education System: Implications for Policy and Institutional Practice," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(3), pages 142-153.
    3. Zimmermann, Karin, 2016. "Neue Wissenschaftspolitik der Gleichstellung in Deutschland," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 375-393.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Danièle Meulders & Sile Padraigin O'Dorchai, 2013. "She Figures 2012: Women and science: Statistics and Indicators," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/135739, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    2. Mary Frank Fox & Mary Lynn Realff & Diana Roldan Rueda & Jillian Morn, 2017. "International research collaboration among women engineers: frequency and perceived barriers, by regions," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 42(6), pages 1292-1306, December.
    3. Kate White & Paula Burkinshaw, 2019. "Women and Leadership in Higher Education: Special Issue Editorial," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-7, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:179512. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.