IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/espost/162765.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Engineering Design Methodology for Green-Field Supply Chain Architectures - Taxonomic Scheme

Author

Listed:
  • Radanliev, Petar

Abstract

Supply chain engineering requires a design that possesses the flexibility of a complex adaptive system, consisting of interlinking architecture, with external dimensions and system germane internal elements. The aim of this paper is to critically analyse the key supply chain concepts and approaches, to assess the fit between the research literature and the practical issues of supply chain architecture, design and engineering. The objective is to develop a methodology for strategy engineering, which could be used by practitioners when integrating supply chain architecture and design. Taxonomic scheme is applied to consider criteria for strategy architecture, hierarchical strategy integration design, strategy engineering, and integration of supply chain as a conceptual system. The results from this paper derived with the findings that the relationship between supply chain architecture, design and engineering is weak, and challenges remain in the process of adapting and aligning operations. This paper derived with a novel approach for addressing these obstacles, through a conceptual framework diagram and a new methodology, based on the taxonomic scheme. The novelty that derives from this paper is an engineering design methodology for integrating supply chain architecture and design, with criteria that enable decomposing and building a green-field (new and non-existent) supply chain as a system. The taxonomic scheme revealed a number of tools and mechanism, which enabled the development of a new methodology for engineering integrated architecture and design. The review derived with improvements to current and existing theories for analysing interdependencies within and between their individual contexts. This issue is addressed with a hierarchical method for network design, applied for building and combining the integration criteria. The resulting methodology is field tested through a case study with the slate mining industry in North Wales.

Suggested Citation

  • Radanliev, Petar, 2015. "Engineering Design Methodology for Green-Field Supply Chain Architectures - Taxonomic Scheme," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 8(2), pages 52-66.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:162765
    DOI: 10.12660/joscmv8n2p52-66
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/162765/1/Engineering%20Design%20Methodology%20for%20Green-Field%20Supply%20Chain%20Architectures-%20Taxonomic%20Scheme.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.12660/joscmv8n2p52-66?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. van der Vaart, Taco & van Donk, Dirk Pieter, 2008. "A critical review of survey-based research in supply chain integration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(1), pages 42-55, January.
    2. Lamothe, Jacques & Hadj-Hamou, Khaled & Aldanondo, Michel, 2006. "An optimization model for selecting a product family and designing its supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(3), pages 1030-1047, March.
    3. van Donk, Dirk Pieter & van der Vaart, Taco, 2005. "A case of shared resources, uncertainty and supply chain integration in the process industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 97-108, April.
    4. Jayaram, Jayanth & Tan, Keah-Choon, 2010. "Supply chain integration with third-party logistics providers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(2), pages 262-271, June.
    5. Radanliev, Petar, 2016. "Supply Chain Systems Architecture and Engineering Design: Green-field Supply Chain Integration," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 22-30.
    6. Korpela, Jukka & Lehmusvaara, Antti & Tuominen, Markku, 2001. "Customer service based design of the supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 193-204, January.
    7. Danny Miller & Peter H. Friesen, 1978. "Archetypes of Strategy Formulation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(9), pages 921-933, May.
    8. Korpela, Jukka & Lehmusvaara, Antti & Tuominen, Markku, 2001. "An analytic approach to supply chain development," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(1-3), pages 145-155, May.
    9. Radanliev, Petar, 2015. "Green-field Architecture for Sustainable Supply Chain Strategy Formulation," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 4(2), pages 62-67.
    10. Schnetzler, Matthias J. & Sennheiser, Andreas & Schonsleben, Paul, 2007. "A decomposition-based approach for the development of a supply chain strategy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(1), pages 21-42, January.
    11. Radanliev, Petar, 2015. "Architectures for Green-Field Supply Chain Integration: Supply Chain Integration Design," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 13(2), pages 56-78.
    12. He, Yuanqiong & Lai, Kin Keung, 2012. "Supply chain integration and service oriented transformation: Evidence from Chinese equipment manufacturers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(2), pages 791-799.
    13. Andrew Inkpen & Nandan Choudhury, 1995. "The seeking of strategy where it is not: Towards a theory of strategy absence," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(4), pages 313-323.
    14. Manthou, Vicky & Vlachopoulou, Maro & Folinas, Dimitris, 2004. "Virtual e-Chain (VeC) model for supply chain collaboration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(3), pages 241-250, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Radanliev, Petar & De Roure, Dave & R.C. Nurse, Jason & Nicolescu, Razvan & Huth, Michael & Cannady, Stacy & Mantilla Montalvo, Rafael, 2019. "Cyber Security Framework for the Internet-of-Things in Industry 4.0," MPRA Paper 92565, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2019.
    2. Radanliev, Petar & De Roure, David & Nicolescu, Razvan & Huth, Michael & Mantilla Montalvo, Rafael & Cannady, Stacy & Burnap, Peter, 2018. "Future developments in cyber risk assessment for the internet of things," MPRA Paper 92567, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Sep 2018.
    3. Radanliev, Petar & De Roure, David & R.C. Nurse, Jason & Burnap, Pete & Anthi, Eirini & Ani, Uchenna & Maddox, La’Treall & Santos, Omar & Mantilla Montalvo, Rafael, 2019. "Definition of Internet of Things (IoT) Cyber Risk – Discussion on a Transformation Roadmap for Standardization of Regulations, Risk Maturity, Strategy Design and Impact Assessment," MPRA Paper 92569, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bimpizas-Pinis, Meletios & Calzolari, Tommaso & Genovese, Andrea, 2022. "Exploring the transition towards circular supply chains through the arcs of integration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    2. Radanliev, Petar, 2015. "Architectures for Green-Field Supply Chain Integration: Supply Chain Integration Design," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 13(2), pages 56-78.
    3. Liao, Shu-Hsien & Kuo, Fang-I, 2014. "The study of relationships between the collaboration for supply chain, supply chain capabilities and firm performance: A case of the Taiwan׳s TFT-LCD industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 295-304.
    4. Jorge E. Hernández & Josefa Mula & Raúl Poler & Andrew C. Lyons, 2014. "Collaborative Planning in Multi-tier Supply Chains Supported by a Negotiation-Based Mechanism and Multi-agent System," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 235-269, March.
    5. Sajal Kabiraj & Dwarika Prasad Uniyal, 2012. "A Coevolutionary Model as a Collaborative Mechanism for the Business Exchange in the High-technology Industrial Value Chain," Jindal Journal of Business Research, , vol. 1(2), pages 193-207, December.
    6. Huu Tuyen Duong & Gilles Paché, 2016. "Relational integration between supply chain members: Proposal of a measurement scale applicable to Asian emerging countries," Post-Print hal-01436446, HAL.
    7. Radanliev, Petar & De Roure, David & Nicolescu, Razvan & Huth, Michael & Mantilla Montalvo, Rafael & Cannady, Stacy & Burnap, Peter, 2018. "Future developments in cyber risk assessment for the internet of things," MPRA Paper 92567, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Sep 2018.
    8. Yu, Wantao & Jacobs, Mark A. & Salisbury, W. David & Enns, Harvey, 2013. "The effects of supply chain integration on customer satisfaction and financial performance: An organizational learning perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 346-358.
    9. Vijayasarathy, Leo R., 2010. "Supply integration: An investigation of its multi-dimensionality and relational antecedents," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(2), pages 489-505, April.
    10. Dong, Qingxing & Cooper, Orrin, 2016. "An orders-of-magnitude AHP supply chain risk assessment framework," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 144-156.
    11. Yeung, Jeff Hoi Yan & Selen, Willem & Zhang, Min & Huo, Baofeng, 2009. "The effects of trust and coercive power on supplier integration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 66-78, July.
    12. Radanliev, Petar & De Roure, Dave & R.C. Nurse, Jason & Nicolescu, Razvan & Huth, Michael & Cannady, Stacy & Mantilla Montalvo, Rafael, 2019. "Cyber Security Framework for the Internet-of-Things in Industry 4.0," MPRA Paper 92565, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2019.
    13. Marty, Justine & Ruel, Salomée, 2024. "Why is “supply chain collaboration” still a hot topic? A review of decades of research and a comprehensive framework proposal," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    14. Gaetano MARTINO & Rossella PAMPANINI & Francesca MORBIDELLI, 2012. "Integration policy in the agri-food chains: theory and empirical evidences," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 58(9), pages 409-424.
    15. Danese, Pamela & Romano, Pietro & Formentini, Marco, 2013. "The impact of supply chain integration on responsiveness: The moderating effect of using an international supplier network," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 125-140.
    16. Jayaram, Jayanth & Xu, Kefeng, 2013. "The relative influence of external versus internal integration on plant performance in China," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 59-69.
    17. Petar Radanliev, 2023. "The Rise and Fall of Cryptocurrencies: Defining the Economic and Social Values of Blockchain Technologies, assessing the Opportunities, and defining the Financial and Cybersecurity Risks of the Metave," Papers 2309.12322, arXiv.org.
    18. Acar, Yavuz & Atadeniz, Sukran Nilvana, 2015. "Comparison of integrated and local planning approaches for the supply network of a globally-dispersed enterprise," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 204-219.
    19. Elcio Mendonça Tachizawa & Cristina Giménez, 2005. "Drivers and sources of supply flexibility: An exploratory study," Economics Working Papers 889, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    20. Tim Gruchmann & Nadine Pratt & Jan Eiten & Ani Melkonyan, 2020. "4PL Digital Business Models in Sea Freight Logistics: The Case of FreightHub," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-14, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Supply chain architecture; supply chain design; green-field supply chain conceptual engineering;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C44 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Operations Research; Statistical Decision Theory
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:162765. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.