IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wut/journl/v3-4y2006p5-27.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A conception of a new algorithm for the project time-cost analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Helena Gaspars

Abstract

Autorka pracy nawiązuje do swojego poprzedniego opracowania, w którym pokazano, że algorytm CPM-COST nie zawsze prowadzi do rozwiązania optymalnego. Celem niniejszej pracy jest zaproponowanie nowej metody, która między innymi tym różni się od tradycyjnego podejścia, iż zakłada się konieczność rozpatrywania, w procesie skracania czasu realizacji przedsięwzięcia, wszystkich ścieżek niedopuszczalnych, czyli dróg, których czas trwania przekracza dyrektywny czas realizacji całego przedsięwzięcia. Przedstawioną procedurę porównano z innymi istniejącymi metodami, stosowanymi w analizie czasowo-kosztowej przedsięwzięć.

Suggested Citation

  • Helena Gaspars, 2006. "A conception of a new algorithm for the project time-cost analysis," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 16(3-4), pages 5-27.
    • Handle: RePEc:wut:journl:v:3-4:y:2006:p:5-27
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ord.pwr.edu.pl/assets/papers_archive/59%20-%20published.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin Skutella, 1998. "Approximation Algorithms for the Discrete Time-Cost Tradeoff Problem," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 909-929, November.
    2. Vanhoucke, Mario, 2005. "New computational results for the discrete time/cost trade-off problem with time-switch constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(2), pages 359-374, September.
    3. L. R. Lamberson & R. R. Hocking, 1970. "Optimum Time Compression in Project Scheduling," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(10), pages 597-606, June.
    4. Don R. Robinson, 1975. "A Dynamic Programming Solution to Cost-Time Tradeoff for CPM," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(2), pages 158-166, October.
    5. S. K. Goyal, 1975. "Note--A Note on "A Simple CPM Time-Cost Tradeoff Algorithm"," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(6), pages 718-722, February.
    6. Nicolai Siemens, 1971. "A Simple CPM Time-Cost Tradeoff Algorithm," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(6), pages 354-363, February.
    7. William Prager, 1963. "A Structural Method of Computing Project Cost Polygons," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(3), pages 394-404, April.
    8. Thomas J. Hindelang & John F. Muth, 1979. "A Dynamic Programming Algorithm for Decision CPM Networks," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 225-241, April.
    9. James E. Kelley, 1961. "Critical-Path Planning and Scheduling: Mathematical Basis," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 9(3), pages 296-320, June.
    10. D. R. Fulkerson, 1961. "A Network Flow Computation for Project Cost Curves," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(2), pages 167-178, January.
    11. Siemens, Nicolai & Gooding, Carl, 1975. "Reducing project duration at minimum cost: A time-cost tradeoff algorithm," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 3(5), pages 569-581, October.
    12. James E. Falk & Joel L. Horowitz, 1972. "Critical Path Problems with Concave Cost-Time Curves," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(4-Part-1), pages 446-455, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vanhoucke, Mario, 2005. "New computational results for the discrete time/cost trade-off problem with time-switch constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(2), pages 359-374, September.
    2. M. Vanhoucke, 2007. "An electromagnetic time/cost trade-off optimization in project scheduling," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 07/457, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    3. Marcin Anholcer & Helena Gaspars-Wieloch, 2011. "Efficiency analysis of the Kaufmann and Dezbazeille algorithm for the deadline problem," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 21(1), pages 5-18.
    4. Nicole Megow & Rolf H. Möhring & Jens Schulz, 2011. "Decision Support and Optimization in Shutdown and Turnaround Scheduling," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 189-204, May.
    5. R L Bregman, 2009. "Preemptive expediting to improve project due date performance," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(1), pages 120-129, January.
    6. Bregman, Robert L., 2009. "A heuristic procedure for solving the dynamic probabilistic project expediting problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(1), pages 125-137, January.
    7. Akkan, Can & Drexl, Andreas & Kimms, Alf, 2000. "Network decomposition-based lower and upper bounds for the discrete time-cost tradeoff problem," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 527, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    8. A B Hafızoğlu & M Azizoğlu, 2010. "Linear programming based approaches for the discrete time/cost trade-off problem in project networks," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(4), pages 676-685, April.
    9. Brucker, Peter & Drexl, Andreas & Mohring, Rolf & Neumann, Klaus & Pesch, Erwin, 1999. "Resource-constrained project scheduling: Notation, classification, models, and methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 3-41, January.
    10. De, Prabuddha & James Dunne, E. & Ghosh, Jay B. & Wells, Charles E., 1995. "The discrete time-cost tradeoff problem revisited," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 81(2), pages 225-238, March.
    11. Choi, Byung-Cheon & Park, Myoung-Ju, 2015. "A continuous time–cost tradeoff problem with multiple milestones and completely ordered jobs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(3), pages 748-752.
    12. Akkan, Can & Drexl, Andreas & Kimms, Alf, 2005. "Network decomposition-based benchmark results for the discrete time-cost tradeoff problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(2), pages 339-358, September.
    13. S. Selcuk Erenguc & Taeho Ahn & Daniel G. Conway, 2001. "The resource constrained project scheduling problem with multiple crashable modes: An exact solution method," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 48(2), pages 107-127, March.
    14. Ahn, Taeho & Erenguc, S. Selcuk, 1998. "The resource constrained project scheduling problem with multiple crashable modes: A heuristic procedure," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(2), pages 250-259, June.
    15. He, Zhengwen & Wang, Nengmin & Jia, Tao & Xu, Yu, 2009. "Simulated annealing and tabu search for multi-mode project payment scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(3), pages 688-696, November.
    16. Kolisch, R. & Padman, R., 2001. "An integrated survey of deterministic project scheduling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 249-272, June.
    17. Martin Skutella, 1998. "Approximation Algorithms for the Discrete Time-Cost Tradeoff Problem," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 909-929, November.
    18. Yaghoubi, Saeed & Noori, Siamak & Azaron, Amir & Fynes, Brian, 2015. "Resource allocation in multi-class dynamic PERT networks with finite capacity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(3), pages 879-894.
    19. Hajdu M. & Isaac S., 2016. "Sixty years of project planning: history and future," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 8(1), pages 1499-1510, December.
    20. Azaron, Amir & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, Reza, 2007. "Multi-objective time-cost trade-off in dynamic PERT networks using an interactive approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 180(3), pages 1186-1200, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wut:journl:v:3-4:y:2006:p:5-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adam Kasperski (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iopwrpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.