IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v3y1975i5p569-581.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reducing project duration at minimum cost: A time-cost tradeoff algorithm

Author

Listed:
  • Siemens, Nicolai
  • Gooding, Carl

Abstract

The problem of reducing project duration efficiently arises frequently, routinely, and repetitively in government and industry. Siemens [1] has presented an inherently simple time-cost tradeoff algorithm (SAM--for Siemens Approximation Method) for determining which activities in a project network must be shortened to meet an externally imposed (scheduled) completion date (which occurs prior to the current expected completion date). In that paper the network activities of the example problem all have constant cost-slopes. Siemens mentions that the algorithm can be used where the activities have (convex) nonlinear cost-slopes--instead of just one cost-slope and one supply (time available for shortening) for each activity, there can be multiple cost-slope/supply pairs for each activity. This technique is illustrated in this paper. Also illustrated here is an improvement suggested by Goyal [2]. In step 12 of the original algorithm Siemens suggests a review of the solution obtained by the first eleven steps to eliminate any unnecessary shortening. Goyal's modification does this systematically during application of the algorithm by de-shortening (partially or totally) selected activities which were shortened in a prior iteration. He claims that, empirically at least, the technique always yields an optimal solution. Our experience verifies this claim (given the assumption of convex cost functions). The authors have modified the original algorithm so that the requirement for convex cost functions can now be relaxed. Unfortunately, this modification is made only at the expense of simplicity. To further complicate matters we found that Goyal's technique does not always yield an optimal solution when concave functions are involved and thus still another modification was required. These are discussed in detail below. Finally, we discuss the applicability of the algorithm to situations involving discrete time-cost functions.

Suggested Citation

  • Siemens, Nicolai & Gooding, Carl, 1975. "Reducing project duration at minimum cost: A time-cost tradeoff algorithm," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 3(5), pages 569-581, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:3:y:1975:i:5:p:569-581
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0305-0483(75)90030-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vanhoucke, Mario, 2005. "New computational results for the discrete time/cost trade-off problem with time-switch constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(2), pages 359-374, September.
    2. M. Vanhoucke, 2007. "An electromagnetic time/cost trade-off optimization in project scheduling," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 07/457, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    3. Helena Gaspars, 2006. "A conception of a new algorithm for the project time-cost analysis," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 16(3-4), pages 5-27.
    4. Nicole Megow & Rolf H. Möhring & Jens Schulz, 2011. "Decision Support and Optimization in Shutdown and Turnaround Scheduling," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 189-204, May.
    5. R L Bregman, 2009. "Preemptive expediting to improve project due date performance," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(1), pages 120-129, January.
    6. Bregman, Robert L., 2009. "A heuristic procedure for solving the dynamic probabilistic project expediting problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(1), pages 125-137, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:3:y:1975:i:5:p:569-581. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.