IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wun/journl/tjev03y2010i2(10)a03.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inter-company Cooperation Faced with a Risk of Organisational Sclerosis: Opportunism as a Potential Source of Performance?

Author

Listed:
  • Francois FULCONIS

    (Laboratoire CRET-LOG - Centre de REcherche sur le Transport et la LOGistique (Aix-Marseille 2), Université d'Avignon et des Pays de Vaucluse – I.U.T. d'Avignon, France)

Abstract

Since the end of the 1980s, much academic works has been devoted to the study of the relations between companies, especially to the improvement of these relations, starting with the implementation of co-operative strategies within inter-organisational networks. Lasting commitment in a relation and a mutual climate of confidence form the two pillars of new strategic approaches which come to amend known models founded on competition and the exclusive research of self-interest. For these approaches, the potential opportunism of the co-contactors obviously has a disastrous impact: how can one engage in a continuing relationship of exchange if one fears at the outset that the partner is systematically preoccupied with his own interests and in so doing, is eventually using stealth or trickery or even violating the rules established in that cooperation? Mainstream research in organisational theory and strategic management presents opportunistic behaviour in a negative light and is largely counter-productive for relationships between inter-organisational networks members. Only long-term involvement and total trust in the partners would create value. The article questions this traditional view by indicating that a more “moderate” opportunism could at last have an unsuspected positive impact on the functioning of inter-organisational networks. The point of view is illustrated and discussed from the study of network France Distribution Gestion (FDG) operating in the wholesaling industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Francois FULCONIS, 2010. "Inter-company Cooperation Faced with a Risk of Organisational Sclerosis: Opportunism as a Potential Source of Performance?," Timisoara Journal of Economics, West University of Timisoara, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 3(2(10)), pages 85-98.
  • Handle: RePEc:wun:journl:tje:v03:y2010:i2(10):a03
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://tje.uvt.ro/index.php/tje/article/download/69/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shantanu Dutta & Mark Bergen & George John, 1994. "The Governance of Exclusive Territories When Dealers can Bootleg," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(1), pages 83-99.
    2. Stanley Baiman & Madhav V. Rajan, 2002. "The Role of Information and Opportunism in the Choice of Buyer‐Supplier Relationships," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 247-278, May.
    3. Ronald Coase, 2006. "The Conduct of Economics: The Example of Fisher Body and General Motors," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(2), pages 255-278, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. François Fulconis, 2010. "Les coopérations inter-entreprises face au risque de sclérose organisationnelle : l’opportunisme comme source potentielle de performance ?," Post-Print hal-02819424, HAL.
    2. Hui, Kai Wai & Klasa, Sandy & Yeung, P. Eric, 2012. "Corporate suppliers and customers and accounting conservatism," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 115-135.
    3. Yushi Tsunoda, 2022. "When should a firm set its selling price to cope with gray market trade?," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(1), pages 16-25, January.
    4. Reza Ahmadi & B. Rachel Yang, 2000. "Parallel Imports: Challenges from Unauthorized Distribution Channels," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(3), pages 279-294, March.
    5. Ernan Haruvy & Elena Katok & Zhongwen Ma & Suresh Sethi, 2019. "Relationship-specific investment and hold-up problems in supply chains: theory and experiments," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 12(1), pages 45-74, April.
    6. Arturs Kalnins, 2004. "An Empirical Analysis of Territorial Encroachment Within Franchised and Company-Owned Branded Chains," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 476-489, September.
    7. Clinton Free, 2007. "Supply†Chain Accounting Practices in the UK Retail Sector: Enabling or Coercing Collaboration?," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(3), pages 897-933, September.
    8. Balachandran, Kashi R. & Wang, Hsiao-Wen & Li, Shu-Hsing & Wang, Taychang, 2013. "In-house capability and supply chain decisions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 473-484.
    9. Per L. Bylund, 2015. "Signifying Williamson's Contribution to the Transaction Cost Approach: An Agent-Based Simulation of Coasean Transaction Costs and Specialization," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(1), pages 148-174, January.
    10. El-Moghazi, Mohamed & Whalley, Jason & Irvine, James, 2014. "Wireless Access Policy for Electronic Communications Services (WAPECS): Collision between theory and practice," 25th European Regional ITS Conference, Brussels 2014 101380, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    11. Selena Aureli & Andrea Cardoni & Mara Del Baldo & Rosa Lombardi, 2019. "Traditional management accounting tools in SMEs? network. Do they foster partner dialogue and business innovation?," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2019(1 suppl.), pages 35-50.
    12. Habib Mahama & Zhichao (Alex) Wang, 2023. "Impact of the interactive and diagnostic uses of performance measurement systems on procedural fairness perception, cooperation and performance in supply alliances," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(3), pages 3253-3296, September.
    13. Jean-Michel Oudot & Claude Ménard, 2010. "Opportunisme ou équité ? Le cas des contrats d’approvisionnement de défense," Revue Française d'Économie, Programme National Persée, vol. 24(3), pages 195-226.
    14. Ying Xiao & Udatta Palekar & Yunchuan Liu, 2011. "Shades of gray—the impact of gray markets on authorized distribution channels," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 9(2), pages 155-178, June.
    15. Dequiedt, Vianney & Martimort, David, 2004. "Delegated monitoring versus arm's-length contracting," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 22(7), pages 951-981, September.
    16. Walther Zeug & Alberto Bezama & Urs Moesenfechtel & Anne Jähkel & Daniela Thrän, 2019. "Stakeholders’ Interests and Perceptions of Bioeconomy Monitoring Using a Sustainable Development Goal Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-24, March.
    17. Thorsten Posselt, 1998. "Motive für Selektiwertrieb — Eine institutionenökonomische Untersuchung," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 50(12), pages 1098-1119, December.
    18. Kim, Taeyeon & Kim, Hyun-Dong & Park, Kwangwoo, 2023. "Customer concentration and firm risk: The role of outside directors from a major customer," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    19. Chunguang Bai & Joseph Sarkis, 2016. "Supplier development investment strategies: a game theoretic evaluation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 240(2), pages 583-615, May.
    20. Littlechild, Stephen C. & Skerk, Carlos J., 2008. "Transmission expansion in Argentina 2: The Fourth Line revisited," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 1385-1419, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    interfirm cooperations; opportunism; performance; trust; inter-organizational networks;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General
    • M13 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - New Firms; Startups
    • L14 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Transactional Relationships; Contracts and Reputation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wun:journl:tje:v03:y2010:i2(10):a03. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Romeo Margea (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feuvtro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.