IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/rpbfmp/v20y2017i03ns0219091517500187.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving Capital Budgeting Through Probabilistic Approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Oualid Benallou

    (Laboratory of Study and Research in Applied Mathematics, Mohammadia School of Engineering, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco)

  • Rajae Aboulaich

    (Laboratory of Study and Research in Applied Mathematics, Mohammadia School of Engineering, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco)

Abstract

This article advocates the multiple benefits of applying probabilistic approaches to capital budgeting through enriching the deterministic framework with a stochastic modeling of main impacting inputs (including a methodology for selecting the most important inputs to be modeled stochastically). The essential limitations of the deterministic capital budgeting methodology are presented: behavioral biases (optimism, asymmetric probability distribution, etc.), incomplete view of the risk return profile, neglecting real options (be it to evaluate a project or to reshape it in a value creation perspective), portfolio diversification impact, etc. Through some selected examples, we illustrate how each of these limitations can be mitigated thanks to probabilistic approaches leading to a better decision-making process and ultimately more value creation.

Suggested Citation

  • Oualid Benallou & Rajae Aboulaich, 2017. "Improving Capital Budgeting Through Probabilistic Approaches," Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies (RPBFMP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(03), pages 1-21, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:wsi:rpbfmp:v:20:y:2017:i:03:n:s0219091517500187
    DOI: 10.1142/S0219091517500187
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0219091517500187
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S0219091517500187?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luban F., 2002. "An Integrated Investment Decision Analysis Procedure Combining Simulation and Utility Theory," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1-2), pages 23-36, January -.
    2. Binder, John J & Chaput, J Scott, 1996. ""Error Correction": A Positive Analysis of Corporate Capital Budgeting Practices," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 307-307, November.
    3. Mufaddal Baxamusa, 2012. "The Relationship between Underinvestment, Overinvestment and CEO's Compensation," Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies (RPBFMP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(03), pages 1-26.
    4. Victor Dragota & Lucian Tatu & Daniel Pele & Nicoleta Vintila & Andreea Semenescu, 2010. "Capital budgeting: the Romanian university professors' points of view," The Review of Finance and Banking, Academia de Studii Economice din Bucuresti, Romania / Facultatea de Finante, Asigurari, Banci si Burse de Valori / Catedra de Finante, vol. 2(2), pages 95-102, December.
    5. Goran Karanovic & Bisera Gjosevska, 2012. "Analysis of Risk and Uncertainty Using Monte Carlo Simulation and its Influence on Project Realization," Annals - Economic and Administrative Series -, Faculty of Business and Administration, University of Bucharest, vol. 6(1), pages 145-162, December.
    6. Binder, John J & Chaput, J Scott, 1996. "A Positive Analysis of Corporate Capital Budgeting Practices," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 6(3), pages 245-257, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Diego Alejandro Toro Morales & Giovanni Franco Sepúlveda & Erick de la Barra & Juan Camilo Del Río Cuervo, 2024. "Cutoff Grade Optimization on Operative Decision Variables with Geological Uncertainty in an Underground Gold Mine: A Real Case Study," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-16, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Glenn Boyle & Graeme Guthrie, 2006. "Payback without apology," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 46(1), pages 1-10, March.
    2. repec:vuw:vuwscr:18957 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Boyle, Glenn & Guthrie, Graeme, 2006. "Payback Without Apology," Working Paper Series 18957, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
    4. Syarifuddin, Ferry, 2020. "An Optimal Islamic Investment Decision in Two-region Economy: The Case of Indonesia and Malaysia," MPRA Paper 104809, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Hsiao-Fen Hsiao & Tingyong Zhong & Hasan Dincer, 2019. "Analysing Managers’ Financial Motivation for Sustainable Investment Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-22, July.
    6. Shujahat Haider Hashmi & Munawar Hussain & Raja Muhammad Ahsan Ilyas & Muhammad Asif Khan, 2017. "Sensitivity analysis for the determinants of investment appraisal," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 15(148), pages 686-686.
    7. Shanyi Zhou & Ning Yan & Zhijun Li & Mo Geng & Xulong Zhang & Hongbiao Si & Lihua Tang & Wenyuan Sun & Longda Zhang & Yi Cao, 2023. "Research on the Impact of Executive Shareholding on New Investment in Enterprises Based on Multivariable Linear Regression Model," Papers 2309.10986, arXiv.org.
    8. Ingrid-Mihaela Dragota & Victor Dragota & Lucian Tâtu & Daniel Traian Pele & Nicoleta Vintila & Andreea Semenescu, 2011. "Capital Budgeting: the Romanian Credit Analysts’ Points of View," The Review of Finance and Banking, Academia de Studii Economice din Bucuresti, Romania / Facultatea de Finante, Asigurari, Banci si Burse de Valori / Catedra de Finante, vol. 3(1), pages 039-045, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:rpbfmp:v:20:y:2017:i:03:n:s0219091517500187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/rpbfmp/rpbfmp.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.