IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/rpbfmp/v13y2010i01ns0219091510001809.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is R&D Always Beneficial?

Author

Listed:
  • Hsu-Ling Chang

    (Department of Accounting and Information, Ling Tung University, Taichung, Taiwan)

  • Chi-Wei Su

    (Department of International Trade, Tamkang University, 151 Ying-Chun Road, Tamsui, Taipei, Taiwan 25137, Taiwan)

Abstract

This study sets out with the aim of determining whether there is such a thing as an optimal level of research and development (R&D) intensity within which a firm can effectively maximize its sales growth ratio. We adopt an advanced panel threshold regression model to examine the relationship between R&D intensity and the growth rate in sales based upon data on firms within the electronics industry in Taiwan. The results demonstrate that R&D intensity has a positive impact on sales growth when the level of such R&D intensity is below the threshold value, and a negative impact when the level of R&D intensity is above the threshold value.

Suggested Citation

  • Hsu-Ling Chang & Chi-Wei Su, 2010. "Is R&D Always Beneficial?," Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies (RPBFMP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 13(01), pages 157-174.
    • Handle: RePEc:wsi:rpbfmp:v:13:y:2010:i:01:n:s0219091510001809
    DOI: 10.1142/S0219091510001809
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0219091510001809
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S0219091510001809?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jora R. Minasian, 1962. "The Economics of Research and Development," NBER Chapters, in: The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, pages 93-142, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Geroski, Paul A, 1999. "The Growth of Firms in Theory and in Practice," CEPR Discussion Papers 2092, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lei Gao & Leo L. Yang & Joseph H. Zhang, 2016. "Corporate patents, R&D success, and tax avoidance," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 1063-1096, November.
    2. Sudip Datta & Anand Jha & Manoj Kulchania, 2020. "On accounting’s twenty-first century challenge: evidence on the relation between intangible assets and audit fees," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 123-162, July.
    3. Darya Dancaková & Jakub Sopko & Jozef Glova & Alena Andrejovská, 2022. "The Impact of Intangible Assets on the Market Value of Companies: Cross-Sector Evidence," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(20), pages 1-14, October.
    4. Cheng Lu & Lanfeng Kao & Anlin Chen, 2012. "The effects of R&D, venture capital, and technology on the underpricing of IPOs in Taiwan," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 39(4), pages 423-445, November.
    5. Chen, Yiqi & Ibhagui, Oyakhilome W., 2019. "R&D-firm performance nexus: New evidence from NASDAQ listed firms," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    6. Pervaiz Alam & Min Liu & Xiaofeng Peng, 2014. "R&D expenditures and implied equity risk premiums," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 441-462, October.
    7. Alok Bhargava, 2013. "Executive compensation, share repurchases and investment expenditures: econometric evidence from US firms," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 403-422, April.
    8. Sung Kwon & Jennifer Yin, 2015. "A comparison of earnings persistence in high-tech and non-high-tech firms," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 645-668, May.
    9. Ann Ling-Ching Chan & Edward Lee & Jirada Petaibanlue & Ning Tan, 2017. "Do board interlocks motivate voluntary disclosure? Evidence from Taiwan," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 441-466, February.
    10. Carmen Cotei & Joseph Farhat, 2017. "The Leasing Decisions of Startup Firms," Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies (RPBFMP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(04), pages 1-30, December.
    11. Tomasz L. Nawrocki, 2015. "R&D Activity And Core Business Efficiency On The Example Of Technology Companies," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 6(4), pages 59-72, December.
    12. Mustafa Ciftci & Nan Zhou, 2016. "Capitalizing R&D expenses versus disclosing intangible information," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 661-689, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giorgio Fagiolo & Alessandra Luzzi, 2006. "Do liquidity constraints matter in explaining firm size and growth? Some evidence from the Italian manufacturing industry," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 15(1), pages 1-39, February.
    2. Ireneusz Janiuk, 2017. "Mergers and Acquisitions: Their Role in the Process of Diversification of an Enterprise," Theory Methodology Practice (TMP), Faculty of Economics, University of Miskolc, vol. 13(01), pages 37-52.
    3. Coad, Alex & Rao, Rekha & Tamagni, Federico, 2011. "Growth processes of Italian manufacturing firms," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 54-70, February.
    4. Giulio Bottazzi & Angelo Secchi, 2006. "Explaining the distribution of firm growth rates," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 37(2), pages 235-256, June.
    5. Micheline Goedhuys & Leo Sleuwaegen, 2010. "High-growth entrepreneurial firms in Africa: a quantile regression approach," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 31-51, January.
    6. Angel Sevil & Alfonso Cruz & Tomas Reyes & Roberto Vassolo, 2022. "When Being Large Is Not an Advantage: How Innovation Impacts the Sustainability of Firm Performance in Natural Resource Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-20, December.
    7. Francesca Lotti & Enrico Santarelli, 2004. "Industry Dynamics and the Distribution of Firm Sizes: A Nonparametric Approach," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 70(3), pages 443-466, January.
    8. Cefis, Elena & Ciccarelli, Matteo & Orsenigo, Luigi, 2007. "Testing Gibrat's legacy: A Bayesian approach to study the growth of firms," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 348-369, September.
    9. Bottazzi, Giulio & Dosi, Giovanni & Lippi, Marco & Pammolli, Fabio & Riccaboni, Massimo, 2001. "Innovation and corporate growth in the evolution of the drug industry," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 19(7), pages 1161-1187, July.
    10. Michael Pfaffermayr, 2007. "Firm Growth Under Sample Selection: Conditional σ-Convergence in Firm Size?," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 31(4), pages 303-328, December.
    11. Claudio Cozza & Franco Malerba & Maria Luisa Mancusi & Giulio Perani & Andrea Vezzulli, 2012. "Innovation, profitability and growth in medium and high-tech manufacturing industries: evidence from Italy," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(15), pages 1963-1976, May.
    12. Otto, Anne & Fornahl, Dirk, 2008. "Long-term growth determinants of young businesses in Germany : effects of regional concentration and specialisation," IAB-Discussion Paper 200813, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    13. Yosuke Okada, 2005. "Competition and Productivity in Japanese Manufacturing Industries," NBER Working Papers 11540, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Ariel Pakes & Mark Schankerman, 1984. "An Exploration into the Determinants of Research Intensity," NBER Chapters, in: R&D, Patents, and Productivity, pages 209-232, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Christos Axioglou & Nicos Christodoulakis, 2021. "Which firms survive in a crisis? Investigating Gibrat’s Law in Greece 2001–2014," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 48(2), pages 159-217, June.
    16. Neng Jiang & Paul A. Kattuman, 2012. "China’s WTO Accession and Long-Term Profitability of Chinese Firms," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 53-73, February.
    17. Martínez, Juan Carlos, 1973. "On the economics of technological change: induced innovation in Argentine agriculture," ISU General Staff Papers 197301010800005952, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    18. Bruton HJ., 1979. "On the production of appropriate technology," ILO Working Papers 991822923402676, International Labour Organization.
    19. Alex Coad & Rekha Rao, 2006. "Innovation and firm growth in "complex technology" sectors: a quantile regression approach," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00118797, HAL.
    20. Alex Coad & Rekha Rao, 2010. "Firm growth and R&D expenditure," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 127-145.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    R&D growth; Gibrat's Law; panel unit root test; panel threshold regression model; C3; G3;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G1 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets
    • G2 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services
    • G3 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:rpbfmp:v:13:y:2010:i:01:n:s0219091510001809. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/rpbfmp/rpbfmp.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.