IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/cjuesx/v04y2016i01ns2345748116500056.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Significance and General Approaches of Climatic Carrying Capacity Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Li YU

    (National Climate Center, No. 46 Zhongguancun Nandajie, Haidian District, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Yanyu LU

    (Anhui Climate Center, No. 16 Shihe Road, Shushan District, Hefei, Anhui Province 230031, China)

  • Wei HUANG

    (Yunnan Climate Center, No. 73 Xishang Road, Kunming, Yunnan 650034, China)

  • Yuqing XU

    (National Climate Center, No. 46 Zhongguancun Nandajie, Haidian District, Beijing 100081, China)

Abstract

The construction of ecological civilization needs to take both environmental protection and socio-economic development into consideration. Climate is one of the important environmental resources; it is also a foundation which human and society development depend on. Climate changes have exerted significant global impacts, which will continue in the future and affect population, livelihoods, economy, resources, ecosystems and many other aspects. In the future development planning, we need to coordinate the change of climate system and its impacts, fully follow and abide by climatic rules, take into consideration climatic carrying capacity, define the natural ecosystem and the intensity and scale of human socio-economic activities which the climatic resources can carry. This article introduces some related research background about the carrying capacities of environment and resources, and brings out the concept of climatic carrying capacity. In addition, the article summarizes general approaches of climatic carrying capacity assessment and introduces two case studies of climatic carrying capacity to clarify the urgency and importance of climatic carrying capacity assessment, as well as its practical significance to socio-economic development. The assessment of climatic carrying capacity has just got off the ground, and is faced with many challenges. We suggest that the priority lies in constructing and improving the theoretical foundation and assessment framework of climatic carrying capacity; secondly, the assessment should be focused on practicality and operability in accordance with local conditions; thirdly, the assessment on climatic carrying capacity needs to be integrated with other disciplines, and the application areas and service objects should be broadened; and finally, carrying out the assessment of climatic carrying capacity, especially quantitative assessment, requires continuous innovation and further involvement of new technological methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Li YU & Yanyu LU & Wei HUANG & Yuqing XU, 2016. "The Significance and General Approaches of Climatic Carrying Capacity Assessment," Chinese Journal of Urban and Environmental Studies (CJUES), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 4(01), pages 1-14, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wsi:cjuesx:v:04:y:2016:i:01:n:s2345748116500056
    DOI: 10.1142/S2345748116500056
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S2345748116500056
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S2345748116500056?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Irmi Seidl & Clem A. Tisdell, 2003. "Carrying capacity reconsidered: from Malthus' population theory to cultural carrying capacity," Chapters, in: Ecological and Environmental Economics, chapter 13, pages 192-206, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ajun Wan & Runqiu Tu & Weidong Yue & Yixuan Liu & Yunpeng Wu, 2021. "Construction and case study of rural environmental value-added evaluation system based on emergy theory," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 4715-4734, March.
    2. Ajun Wan & Xiaolei Qi & Weidong Yue & Runqiu Tu, 2022. "Construction and case verification of rural environmental value-added evaluation system," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 1781-1797, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vail, David & Heldt, Tobias, 2004. "Governing snowmobilers in multiple-use landscapes: Swedish and Maine (USA) cases," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 469-483, April.
    2. Chuang-lin Fang & Chao Bao & Jin-chuan Huang, 2007. "Management Implications to Water Resources Constraint Force on Socio-economic System in Rapid Urbanization: A Case Study of the Hexi Corridor, NW China," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 21(9), pages 1613-1633, September.
    3. Małgorzata Świąder & Szymon Szewrański & Jan K. Kazak, 2018. "Foodshed as an Example of Preliminary Research for Conducting Environmental Carrying Capacity Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-22, March.
    4. Xueqi Wang & Shuo Wang & Gengyuan Liu & Ningyu Yan & Qing Yang & Bin Chen & Junhong Bai & Yan Zhang & Ginevra Virginia Lombardi, 2022. "Identification of Priority Areas for Improving Urban Ecological Carrying Capacity: Based on Supply–Demand Matching of Ecosystem Services," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-24, May.
    5. Zamru Ajuhari & Azlizam Aziz & Sam Shor Nahar Yaakob & Shamsul Abu Bakar & Manohar Mariapan, 2023. "Systematic Literature Review on Methods of Assessing Carrying Capacity in Recreation and Tourism Destinations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    6. Puliafito, Salvador Enrique & Puliafito, José Luis & Grand, Mariana Conte, 2008. "Modeling population dynamics and economic growth as competing species: An application to CO2 global emissions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 602-615, April.
    7. Yoon, Tae Kyung & Myeong, Ji Yong & Lee, Yuju & Choi, Yun Eui & Lee, Seonghun & Lee, Sugwang & Byun, Chaeho, 2024. "Are you okay with overtourism in forests? Path between crowding perception, satisfaction, and management action of trail visitors in South Korea," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    8. Moon, Wanki, 2011. "Is agriculture compatible with free trade?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 13-24.
    9. Mondelaers, Koen & Kuosmanen, Timo & Van Passel, Steven & Buysse, Jeroen & Lauwers, Ludwig H. & Van Huylenbroeck, Guido, 2011. "Sustainable Efficiency Of Firms When New Sustainability Targets Are Introduced," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 114633, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Guiyou Zhang & Shuai Luo & Zhuowei Jing & Shuo Wei & Youhua Ma, 2020. "Evaluation and Forewarning Management of Regional Resources and Environment Carrying Capacity: A Case Study of Hefei City, Anhui Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, February.
    11. Manshadi, Zahra Dehghan & Parivar, Parastoo & Sotoudeh, Ahad & Morovati Sharifabadi, Ali, 2024. "Modeling urban growth effects on carrying capacity in arid and semi-arid regions using system dynamics," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 487(C).
    12. Ying Peng & Xingyu Tan & Zhanglin Zhu & Jiayun Liao & Luojing Xiang & Feng Wu, 2024. "Evaluation of Resource and Environmental Carrying Capacity at Provincial Level in China Using a Pressure–Support–Adjustment Ternary System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-25, October.
    13. Rodica-Manuela Gogonea & Simona Ioana Ghita & Andreea Simona Saseanu, 2020. "Biocapacity—Premise of Sustainable Development in the European Space," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-26, February.
    14. Melikoglu, Mehmet, 2013. "Vision 2023: Assessing the feasibility of electricity and biogas production from municipal solid waste in Turkey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 52-63.
    15. Chen Zeng & Yaolin Liu & Yanfang Liu & Jiameng Hu & Xiaogang Bai & Xiaoyu Yang, 2011. "An Integrated Approach for Assessing Aquatic Ecological Carrying Capacity: A Case Study of Wujin District in the Tai Lake Basin, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-17, January.
    16. Hubacek, Klaus & van den Bergh, Jeroen C.J.M., 2006. "Changing concepts of 'land' in economic theory: From single to multi-disciplinary approaches," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 5-27, January.
    17. Azomahou, Theophile & Mishra, Tapas, 2009. "Stochastic environmental effects, demographic variation, and economic growth," MERIT Working Papers 2009-016, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    18. Hao Li & Yuxin Zhang & Xiaoli Wang & Peng Guo & Kai Liu, 2024. "Monitoring and Evaluation of Coastal Ecological Carrying Capacity in the Context of Sustainable Development: A Case Study of Shandong Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, November.
    19. Cláudia Hipólito & Fernando Lopes & Jorge Gonçalves & Helena Calado, 2024. "A Critical Approach to Existing Management Perspectives in Scuba Diving: A Step in Defining Ecological Carrying Capacity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-20, February.
    20. Filotas, Elise & Grant, Martin & Parrott, Lael & Rikvold, Per Arne, 2010. "The effect of positive interactions on community structure in a multi-species metacommunity model along an environmental gradient," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(6), pages 885-894.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:cjuesx:v:04:y:2016:i:01:n:s2345748116500056. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/cjues/cjues.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.