IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i19p8607-d1491917.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Resource and Environmental Carrying Capacity at Provincial Level in China Using a Pressure–Support–Adjustment Ternary System

Author

Listed:
  • Ying Peng

    (School of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
    Hubei Provincial Academy of Eco-Environmental Sciences (Provincial Appraisal Center for Ecological and Environmental Engineering), Wuhan 430071, China)

  • Xingyu Tan

    (Hubei Provincial Academy of Eco-Environmental Sciences (Provincial Appraisal Center for Ecological and Environmental Engineering), Wuhan 430071, China)

  • Zhanglin Zhu

    (Hubei Provincial Academy of Eco-Environmental Sciences (Provincial Appraisal Center for Ecological and Environmental Engineering), Wuhan 430071, China)

  • Jiayun Liao

    (Hubei Provincial Academy of Eco-Environmental Sciences (Provincial Appraisal Center for Ecological and Environmental Engineering), Wuhan 430071, China)

  • Luojing Xiang

    (Hubei Provincial Academy of Eco-Environmental Sciences (Provincial Appraisal Center for Ecological and Environmental Engineering), Wuhan 430071, China)

  • Feng Wu

    (School of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)

Abstract

Resources and environment are essential elements of social and economic development. Whether the current resources and environment can sufficiently support economic and social development is an important scientific issue. Existing studies have not reached a consensus on the definition, assessment, and forewarning methods of resource and environmental carrying capacity (RECC). Therefore, this study puts forward a ternary theoretical system of RECC from the perspective of pressure, support, and adjustment, constructs a novel evaluation indices system of RECC, introduces a ternary evaluation model, and proposes a hierarchical forewarning method of RECC with a threshold of 1. Furthermore, an empirical demonstration of 31 provinces in China is presented. The results show that: (1) the average RECC index of 31 areas revealed a downward trend from 2012 to 2021, indicating the gradually improving RECC; (2) the RECC indices of central areas were always high, which manifests the poor RECC; (3) the number of provinces with RECC at Alert Level III decreased from 18 to 7, and the number of provinces at Non-Alert Level increased from 6 to 8.

Suggested Citation

  • Ying Peng & Xingyu Tan & Zhanglin Zhu & Jiayun Liao & Luojing Xiang & Feng Wu, 2024. "Evaluation of Resource and Environmental Carrying Capacity at Provincial Level in China Using a Pressure–Support–Adjustment Ternary System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-25, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:19:p:8607-:d:1491917
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/19/8607/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/19/8607/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Irmi Seidl & Clem A. Tisdell, 2003. "Carrying capacity reconsidered: from Malthus' population theory to cultural carrying capacity," Chapters, in: Ecological and Environmental Economics, chapter 13, pages 192-206, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Tian, Yuan & Sun, Chuanwang, 2018. "A spatial differentiation study on comprehensive carrying capacity of the urban agglomeration in the Yangtze River Economic Belt," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 11-22.
    3. Yu Zhang & Jieyong Wang & Chun Dai, 2021. "The Adjustment of China’s Grain Planting Structure Reduced the Consumption of Cropland and Water Resources," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-15, July.
    4. Hui Zou & Xiaohua Ma, 2021. "Identifying resource and environmental carrying capacity in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China: the perspectives of spatial differences and sustainable development," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(10), pages 14775-14798, October.
    5. Martire, Salvatore & Castellani, Valentina & Sala, Serenella, 2015. "Carrying capacity assessment of forest resources: Enhancing environmental sustainability in energy production at local scale," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 11-20.
    6. An Huang & Li Tian & Qing Li & Yongfu Li & Jianghao Yu & Yuan Gao & Jing Xia, 2023. "Land-Use Planning Serves as a Critical Tool for Improving Resources and Environmental Carrying Capacity: A Review of Evaluation Methods and Application," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-20, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Suizi Wang & Jiangwen Fan & Haiyan Zhang & Yaxian Zhang & Huajun Fang, 2023. "Harmonizing Population, Grain, and Land: Unlocking Sustainable Land Resource Management in the Farming–Pastoral Ecotone," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-14, June.
    2. Jun Liu & Yu Qian & Huihong Chang & Jeffrey Yi-Lin Forrest, 2022. "The Impact of Technology Innovation on Enterprise Capacity Utilization—Evidence from China’s Yangtze River Economic Belt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-17, September.
    3. Peura, Pekka, 2013. "From Malthus to sustainable energy—Theoretical orientations to reforming the energy sector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 309-327.
    4. Jay L Newberry & Zizwe Grandison, 2017. "Streamlining Sustainability: A Principal Component Reduction for Regionally Based African-Centric Indicators," International Journal of Environmental Sciences & Natural Resources, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 1(5), pages 130-141, February.
    5. Li YU & Yanyu LU & Wei HUANG & Yuqing XU, 2016. "The Significance and General Approaches of Climatic Carrying Capacity Assessment," Chinese Journal of Urban and Environmental Studies (CJUES), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 4(01), pages 1-14, March.
    6. Vail, David & Heldt, Tobias, 2004. "Governing snowmobilers in multiple-use landscapes: Swedish and Maine (USA) cases," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 469-483, April.
    7. Shiwei Yu & Xing Hu & Xuejiao Zhang & Zhenxi Li, 2019. "Convergence of per capita carbon emissions in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China," Energy & Environment, , vol. 30(5), pages 776-799, August.
    8. Jinbi Yang & Hao Ding, 2018. "A Quantitative Assessment of Sustainable Development Based on Relative Resource Carrying Capacity in Jiangsu Province of China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-13, December.
    9. Xiaowei Zeng & Xiaomei Yang & Shuai Zhong & Zhihua Wang & Yaxin Ding & Dan Meng & Ku Gao, 2023. "Comprehensive Evaluation of Resource and Environmental Carrying Capacity at a National Scale: A Case Study of Southeast Asia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-32, March.
    10. Yikun Su & Hong Xue & Huakang Liang, 2019. "An Evaluation Model for Urban Comprehensive Carrying Capacity: An Empirical Case from Harbin City," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-25, January.
    11. Huimin Xu & Shougeng Hu & Xi Li, 2023. "Urban Distribution and Evolution of the Yangtze River Economic Belt from the Perspectives of Urban Area and Night-Time Light," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-21, January.
    12. Chuang-lin Fang & Chao Bao & Jin-chuan Huang, 2007. "Management Implications to Water Resources Constraint Force on Socio-economic System in Rapid Urbanization: A Case Study of the Hexi Corridor, NW China," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 21(9), pages 1613-1633, September.
    13. Małgorzata Świąder & Szymon Szewrański & Jan K. Kazak, 2018. "Foodshed as an Example of Preliminary Research for Conducting Environmental Carrying Capacity Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-22, March.
    14. Xueqi Wang & Shuo Wang & Gengyuan Liu & Ningyu Yan & Qing Yang & Bin Chen & Junhong Bai & Yan Zhang & Ginevra Virginia Lombardi, 2022. "Identification of Priority Areas for Improving Urban Ecological Carrying Capacity: Based on Supply–Demand Matching of Ecosystem Services," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-24, May.
    15. Shuddhasattwa Rafiq & Ingrid Nielsen & Russell Smyth, 2016. "Effect of Internal Migration on Air and Water Pollution in China," Monash Economics Working Papers 27-16, Monash University, Department of Economics.
    16. Zamru Ajuhari & Azlizam Aziz & Sam Shor Nahar Yaakob & Shamsul Abu Bakar & Manohar Mariapan, 2023. "Systematic Literature Review on Methods of Assessing Carrying Capacity in Recreation and Tourism Destinations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    17. Ohl, Cornelia & Krauze, Kinga & Grunbuhel, Clemens, 2007. "Towards an understanding of long-term ecosystem dynamics by merging socio-economic and environmental research: Criteria for long-term socio-ecological research sites selection," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(2-3), pages 383-391, August.
    18. Puliafito, Salvador Enrique & Puliafito, José Luis & Grand, Mariana Conte, 2008. "Modeling population dynamics and economic growth as competing species: An application to CO2 global emissions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 602-615, April.
    19. Yoon, Tae Kyung & Myeong, Ji Yong & Lee, Yuju & Choi, Yun Eui & Lee, Seonghun & Lee, Sugwang & Byun, Chaeho, 2024. "Are you okay with overtourism in forests? Path between crowding perception, satisfaction, and management action of trail visitors in South Korea," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    20. Yue, Dongxia & Xu, Xiaofeng & Hui, Cang & Xiong, Youcai & Han, Xuemei & Ma, Jinhui, 2011. "Biocapacity supply and demand in Northwestern China: A spatial appraisal of sustainability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(5), pages 988-994, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:19:p:8607-:d:1491917. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.