IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/acsxxx/v11y2008i04ns0219525908001799.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Rejection Mechanism In 2d Bounded Confidence Provides More Conformity

Author

Listed:
  • S. HUET

    (Cemagref, Laboratoire d'Ingénierie des Systèmes Complexes, 63172 Aubière, France)

  • G. DEFFUANT

    (Cemagref, Laboratoire d'Ingénierie des Systèmes Complexes, 63172 Aubière, France)

  • W. JAGER

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Groningen, The Netherlands)

Abstract

This paper explores the dynamics of attitude change in two dimensions resulting from social interaction. We add a rejection mechanism into the 2D bounded confidence (BC) model proposed by Deffuantet al.(2001). Individuals are characterized by two-dimensional continuous attitudes, each associated with an uncertaintyu, supposed constant in this first study. Individuals interact through random pairs. If their attitudes are closer thanuon both dimensions, or further thanuon both dimensions, or closer thanuon one dimension and not further thanu + δ uon the other dimension, then the rules of the BC model apply. But if their attitudes are closer thanuon one dimension and further thanu + δ uon the other dimension, then the individuals are in a dissonant state. They tend to solve this problem by shifting away their close attitudes. The model shows metastable clusters, which maintain themselves through opposite influences of competitor clusters. Our analysis and first experiments support the hypothesis that, for a large range of uncertainty values, the number of clusters grows linearly with the inverse of the uncertainty, whereas this growth is quadratic in the BC model.

Suggested Citation

  • S. Huet & G. Deffuant & W. Jager, 2008. "A Rejection Mechanism In 2d Bounded Confidence Provides More Conformity," Advances in Complex Systems (ACS), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 11(04), pages 529-549.
    • Handle: RePEc:wsi:acsxxx:v:11:y:2008:i:04:n:s0219525908001799
    DOI: 10.1142/S0219525908001799
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0219525908001799
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S0219525908001799?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andreas Flache, 2018. "About Renegades And Outgroup Haters: Modeling The Link Between Social Influence And Intergroup Attitudes," Advances in Complex Systems (ACS), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(06n07), pages 1-32, September.
    2. Krawczyk, M.J. & Dydejczyk, A. & Kułakowski, K., 2014. "The Simmel effect and babies’ names," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 395(C), pages 384-391.
    3. Dirk Van Rooy & Ian Wood & Eric Tran, 2016. "Modelling the Emergence of Shared Attitudes from Group Dynamics Using an Agent-Based Model of Social Comparison Theory," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(1), pages 188-204, January.
    4. Han, Wenchen & Gao, Shun & Huang, Changwei & Yang, Junzhong, 2022. "Non-consensus states in circular opinion model with repulsive interaction," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 585(C).
    5. Kurmyshev, Evguenii & Juárez, Héctor A. & González-Silva, Ricardo A., 2011. "Dynamics of bounded confidence opinion in heterogeneous social networks: Concord against partial antagonism," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 390(16), pages 2945-2955.
    6. Shane T. Mueller & Yin-Yin Sarah Tan, 2018. "Cognitive perspectives on opinion dynamics: the role of knowledge in consensus formation, opinion divergence, and group polarization," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 15-48, January.
    7. Huang, Changwei & Bian, Huanyu & Han, Wenchen, 2024. "Breaking the symmetry neutralizes the extremization under the repulsion and higher order interactions," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    8. Ding, Haixin & Xie, Li, 2024. "The applicability of positive information in negative opinion management: An attitude-laden communication perspective," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 645(C).
    9. Pedraza, Lucía & Pinasco, Juan Pablo & Saintier, Nicolas & Balenzuela, Pablo, 2021. "An analytical formulation for multidimensional continuous opinion models," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:acsxxx:v:11:y:2008:i:04:n:s0219525908001799. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/acs/acs.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.