IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/syseng/v15y2012i4p471-482.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contracting processes and structures for systems‐of‐systems acquisition

Author

Listed:
  • Rene G. Rendon
  • Thomas V. Huynh
  • John S. Osmundson

Abstract

Acquisition of a system‐of‐systems can be an all new acquisition of multiple systems that are intended to operate together as a system‐of‐systems. Much more common in the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) is acquisition of one or more new systems that are intended to interoperate with existing systems as a system of systems (SoS) with new capabilities. In either case, successful SoS acquisition necessarily depends on effective contracting structures and processes for SoS acquisition. In this paper, a set of issues that need to be addressed in SoS acquisition are identified, and the current findings discussed. The findings suggest maintaining an extensive systems engineering effort within the SoS acquisition and changes to the existing contracting processes, structures, and organizational structures to maximize the probability of SoS acquisition success. The resulting changes are recommended to current and future DoD SoS acquisitions. ©2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Syst Eng 15

Suggested Citation

  • Rene G. Rendon & Thomas V. Huynh & John S. Osmundson, 2012. "Contracting processes and structures for systems‐of‐systems acquisition," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 471-482, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:15:y:2012:i:4:p:471-482
    DOI: 10.1002/sys.21214
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21214
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sys.21214?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Trautmann, Gerhard & Bals, Lydia & Hartmann, Evi, 2009. "Global sourcing in integrated network structures: The case of hybrid purchasing organizations," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 194-208, June.
    2. Pin Chen & Jennie Clothier, 2003. "Advancing systems engineering for systems‐of‐systems challenges," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(3), pages 170-183.
    3. Williamson, Oliver E., 1987. "Transaction cost economics : The comparative contracting perspective," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 8(4), pages 617-625, December.
    4. Marco Furlotti, 2007. "There is more to contracts than incompleteness: a review and assessment of empirical research on inter-firm contract design," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 11(1), pages 61-99, March.
    5. M. Motiar Rahman & Mohan Kumaraswamy, 2002. "Joint risk management through transactionally efficient relational contracting," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 45-54.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nil Kilicay‐Ergin & Cihan Dagli, 2015. "Incentive‐Based Negotiation Model for System of Systems Acquisition," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(3), pages 310-321, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hemanta Doloi, 2009. "Relational partnerships: the importance of communication, trust and confidence and joint risk management in achieving project success," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(11), pages 1099-1109.
    2. Luc Baumstark & Claude Ménard & William Roy & Anne Yvrande-Billon, 2005. "Modes de gestion et efficience des opérateurs dans le secteur des transports urbains de personnes," Post-Print halshs-00103116, HAL.
    3. Patil, Vikram S. & Ghosh, Ranjan, 2015. "Farmer Displacement and Marginalization: A Transaction Cost Explanation from an Irrigation Project in India," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 229378, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Jia, Fu & Lamming, Richard & Sartor, Marco & Orzes, Guido & Nassimbeni, Guido, 2014. "Global purchasing strategy and International Purchasing Offices: Evidence from case studies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 284-298.
    5. Pan Gong & Ningshuang Zeng & Kunhui Ye & Markus König, 2019. "An Empirical Study on the Acceptance of 4D BIM in EPC Projects in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, March.
    6. Kizito Elijah Kanyoma & James Kamwachale Khomba & Eric James Sankhulani & Rabiya Hanif, 2013. "Sourcing Strategy and Supply Chain Risk Management in the Healthcare Sector: A Case Study of Malawi¡¯s Public Healthcare Delivery Supply Chain," Journal of Management and Strategy, Journal of Management and Strategy, Sciedu Press, vol. 4(3), pages 16-26, August.
    7. Per Erik Eriksson & Ossi Pesamaa, 2007. "Modelling procurement effects on cooperation," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(8), pages 893-901.
    8. Habib Mahama & Zhichao (Alex) Wang, 2023. "Impact of the interactive and diagnostic uses of performance measurement systems on procedural fairness perception, cooperation and performance in supply alliances," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(3), pages 3253-3296, September.
    9. Ji, Chen & de Felipe, Isabel & Briz, Julian & Trienekens, Jacques H., 2012. "An Empirical Study on Governance Structure Choices in China´s Pork Supply Chain," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 15(2), pages 1-32, May.
    10. Jun He & Kun Liang & Peng Wu, 2022. "Stability Governance of E-commerce Supply Chain: Social Capital and Governance Mechanism Design Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.
    11. Luai Jraisat & Mohannad Jreissat & Arvind Upadhyay & Farhana Sajjad & Krishna Chandra Balodi, 2022. "Paradox of strategic partnerships for sustainable value chains: Perspectives of not‐for‐profit actors," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3491-3508, November.
    12. Ilir Hajdini, 2024. "Multiple control strategies and franchisor performance: Performance effects of authoritative, contractual, and relational control mechanisms," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 28(3), pages 875-904, September.
    13. Gabriel Jobidon & Pierre Lemieux & Robert Beauregard, 2019. "Comparison of Quebec’s Project Delivery Methods: Relational Contract Law and Differences in Contractual Language," Laws, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-75, April.
    14. Hu, Shan & Yu, Yongze & Fei, Qingyu, 2023. "Social credit and patent quality: Evidence from China," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    15. Pfaff, Yuko Melanie & Birkel, Hendrik & Hartmann, Evi, 2023. "Supply chain governance in the context of industry 4.0: Investigating implications of real-life implementations from a multi-tier perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    16. Driedonks, Boudewijn A. & Gevers, Josette M.P. & van Weele, Arjan J., 2014. "Success factors for sourcing teams: How to foster sourcing team effectiveness," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 288-304.
    17. Setene, Letlama & Jordaan, Daniel du P.S., 2021. "The trade-off between chain performance and fragility considering coordination strategies of agri-food chains: a South African egg chain's case study," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 24(3), March.
    18. Yeniyurt, Sengun & Henke, John W. & Cavusgil, Erin, 2013. "Integrating global and local procurement for superior supplier working relations," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 351-362.
    19. Zhu, Qingyun & Bai, Chunguang & Sarkis, Joseph, 2022. "Blockchain technology and supply chains: The paradox of the atheoretical research discourse," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    20. O'Brien, Kieran, 2020. "Innovation types and the search for new ideas at the fuzzy front end: Where to look and how often?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 13-24.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:15:y:2012:i:4:p:471-482. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6858 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.