IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/syseng/v11y2008i3p203-220.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling and simulation of net centric system of systems using systems modeling language and colored Petri‐nets: A demonstration using the global earth observation system of systems

Author

Listed:
  • Madwaraj Rao
  • Sreeram Ramakrishnan
  • Cihan Dagli

Abstract

Understanding the operations of a large ‘‘net‐centric system‐of‐systems’’ requires in‐depth knowledge of the interfaces and the interactions among the various systems, subsystems, and components. Architectural modeling can help in reducing the complexity involved in designing large networked systems. This paper demonstrates a modeling approach for network centric systems. An example of such a complex system is the Global Earth Observation System of Systems (GEOSS)— a system for monitoring and collecting information related to Earth's resources. The GEOSS is an evolving complex network centric system. The modeling of the GEOSS has been demonstrated using the Systems Modeling Language (SysML). In this paper, architecture representation using SysML demonstrates an object‐oriented approach of model development. This paper discusses issues related to architecture description, development, presentation, and integration for the chosen domain. This paper also highlights some of the differences between SysML, which is used to model a wide range of systems, and Unified Modeling Language (UML), which is primarily used to model information systems only. Finally, in order to synthesize an executable model from the static views developed using SysML, Colored Petri‐nets (CP‐nets) have been used. The executable model, constructed using CP nets, is used to validate the architecture against the static model. Overall, this research defines a methodology to model and simulate complex network centric system of systems in order to understand and simulate their behavior using a scenario based approach. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Syst Eng

Suggested Citation

  • Madwaraj Rao & Sreeram Ramakrishnan & Cihan Dagli, 2008. "Modeling and simulation of net centric system of systems using systems modeling language and colored Petri‐nets: A demonstration using the global earth observation system of systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(3), pages 203-220, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:11:y:2008:i:3:p:203-220
    DOI: 10.1002/sys.20095
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.20095
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sys.20095?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lee W. Wagenhals & Insub Shin & Daesik Kim & Alexander H. Levis, 2000. "C4ISR architectures: II. A structured analysis approach for architecture design," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(4), pages 248-287.
    2. Alexander H. Levis & Lee W. Wagenhals, 2000. "C4ISR architectures: I. Developing a process for C4ISR architecture design," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(4), pages 225-247.
    3. Lee W. Wagenhals & Sajjad Haider & Alexander H. Levis, 2003. "Synthesizing executable models of object oriented architectures," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(4), pages 266-300.
    4. Jesse Daniels & Terry Bahill, 2004. "The hybrid process that combines traditional requirements and use cases," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(4), pages 303-319.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. M. Monperrus & B. Long & J. Champeau & B. Hoeltzener & G. Marchalot & J.M. Jézéquel, 2010. "Model‐driven architecture of a maritime surveillance system simulator," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(3), pages 290-297, September.
    2. Tsan‐Sheng Ng & Shao‐Wei Lam, 2011. "Dynamic maritime systems inquiry: The DIVER approach," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(3), pages 239-254, September.
    3. Renzhong Wang & Cihan H. Dagli, 2011. "Executable system architecting using systems modeling language in conjunction with colored Petri nets in a model‐driven systems development process," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(4), pages 383-409, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ashraf M. Abusharekh & Lawrence E. Gloss & Alexander H. Levis, 2011. "Evaluation of Service Oriented Architecture‐based federated architectures," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(1), pages 56-72, March.
    2. Lee W. Wagenhals & Sajjad Haider & Alexander H. Levis, 2003. "Synthesizing executable models of object oriented architectures," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(4), pages 266-300.
    3. Lee W. Wagenhals & Alexander H. Levis, 2009. "Service Oriented Architectures, the DoD Architecture Framework 1.5, and Executable Architectures," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(4), pages 312-343, December.
    4. Atiogbe Didier Koffi, 2005. "A model for the evolution of software and systems engineering project cultures throughout their life cycles," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(2), pages 151-163.
    5. Shiva Abdoli & Sami Kara, 2017. "A Modelling Framework to Design Executable Logical Architecture of Engineering Systems," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(9), pages 1-75, September.
    6. Renzhong Wang & Cihan H. Dagli, 2011. "Executable system architecting using systems modeling language in conjunction with colored Petri nets in a model‐driven systems development process," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(4), pages 383-409, December.
    7. Eric D. Smith & Young Jun Son & Massimo Piattelli‐Palmarini & A. Terry Bahill, 2007. "Ameliorating mental mistakes in tradeoff studies," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(3), pages 222-240, September.
    8. Lee W. Wagenhals & Insub Shin & Daesik Kim & Alexander H. Levis, 2000. "C4ISR architectures: II. A structured analysis approach for architecture design," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(4), pages 248-287.
    9. Robert E. Thompson & John M. Colombi & Jonathan Black & Bradley J. Ayres, 2015. "Disaggregated Space System Concept Optimization: Model‐Based Conceptual Design Methods," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(6), pages 549-567, November.
    10. Hermann Kaindl, 2005. "A scenario‐based approach for requirements engineering: Experience in a telecommunication software development project," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(3), pages 197-210, September.
    11. Chris Piaszczyk, 2011. "Model Based Systems Engineering with Department of Defense Architectural Framework," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(3), pages 305-326, September.
    12. Miri Sitton & Yoram Reich, 2015. "Enterprise Systems Engineering for Better Operational Interoperability," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(6), pages 625-638, November.
    13. Jesko G. Lamm & Tim Weilkiens, 2014. "Method for Deriving Functional Architectures from Use Cases," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(2), pages 225-236, June.
    14. Timothy J. Eveleigh & Thomas A. Mazzuchi & Shahram Sarkani, 2007. "Spatially‐aware systems engineering design modeling applied to natural hazard vulnerability assessment," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(3), pages 187-202, September.
    15. Insub Shin & Alexander H. Levis, 2003. "Performance prediction of networked information systems via Petri nets and queuing nets," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(1), pages 1-18.
    16. Eric D. Smith & A. Terry Bahill, 2010. "Attribute substitution in systems engineering," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(2), pages 130-148, June.
    17. Thomas Ford & David Meyer & John Colombi & Brian Scheller & Cody Palmer, 2018. "A method of assessing the time-variant value of multi-domain architectures," The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, , vol. 15(4), pages 471-481, October.
    18. Magnus Eriksson & Kjell Borg & Jürgen Börstler, 2008. "Use Cases for Systems Engineering—An Approach and Empirical Evaluation," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(1), pages 39-60, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:11:y:2008:i:3:p:203-220. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6858 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.