IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v32y2024i1p917-939.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

SDGs trade‐offs associated with voluntary sustainability standards: A case study from the coffee sector in Costa Rica

Author

Listed:
  • Karla Rubio‐Jovel
  • Jorge Sellare
  • Yannic Damm
  • Thomas Dietz

Abstract

The transition toward a more sustainable agricultural production has become an essential step in achieving the sustainable development goals (SDGs), launched by the United Nations in 2015. Voluntary sustainability standards (VSS) have been proposed as a useful governance tool for guiding this transition. Thus, this article uses a case study from the coffee sector in Costa Rica to assess the contribution of VSSs to the achievement of the SDGs. We rely on panel data from coffee producers captured between 2017 and 2019 to carry out this assessment. Results of the statistical analysis suggest that VSSs alone are not enough to promote a transition to a more sustainable coffee production, as trade‐offs between the contributions of VSSs to the different SDGs emerge. If the VSSs are to promote sustainable practices among producers while ensuring socioeconomic benefits for producers, workers, and their families, implementation modifications are required.

Suggested Citation

  • Karla Rubio‐Jovel & Jorge Sellare & Yannic Damm & Thomas Dietz, 2024. "SDGs trade‐offs associated with voluntary sustainability standards: A case study from the coffee sector in Costa Rica," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(1), pages 917-939, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:32:y:2024:i:1:p:917-939
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.2701
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2701
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.2701?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:32:y:2024:i:1:p:917-939. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.