IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v16y2008i1p17-34.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinant factors in the degree of implementation of Local Agenda 21 in the European Union

Author

Listed:
  • Isabel M. Garcia-Sanchez

    (University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain)

  • Jose-Manuel Prado-Lorenzo

    (University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain)

Abstract

The concern for sustainable development reached its greatest form of expression in what is known as the Brundtland Report; however, it was the Rio de Janeiro Conference of 1992 that created the foundations, through agreements such as Agenda 21. Though the success of Agenda 21 depends fundamentally on central governments, local administrations can play a decisive role, which is why European cities have taken on a serious commitment to enforce it by way of the Aalborg Charter. This paper evaluates the advancements by European municipalities in implementing Local Agenda 21, by identifying their determinant factors. The results show that productive and organizational aspects are key factors, regardless of their origin. Likewise, it has been verified that the factors of promotion instigated by supramunicipal bodies of the public administration are extremely effective, whereas political factors are of little relevance. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Isabel M. Garcia-Sanchez & Jose-Manuel Prado-Lorenzo, 2008. "Determinant factors in the degree of implementation of Local Agenda 21 in the European Union," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(1), pages 17-34.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:16:y:2008:i:1:p:17-34
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.334
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/sd.334
    File Function: Link to full text; subscription required
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.334?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bob Evans & Marko Joas & Susan Sundback & Kate Theobald, 2006. "Governing local sustainability," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(6), pages 849-867.
    2. Ted Kitchen & David Whitney & Stephen Littlewood, 1997. "Local Authority/AcademicCollaboration and Local Agenda 21 Policy Processes," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(5), pages 645-660.
    3. Sofie Adolfsson Jorby, 2002. "Local Agenda 21 in Four Swedish Municipalities: A Tool towards Sustainability?," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(2), pages 219-244.
    4. Dimitri Devuyst, 2000. "Linking impact assessment and sustainable development at the local level: the introduction of sustainability assessment systems," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 8(2), pages 67-78.
    5. Paul S. Phillips & Paul Clarkson & Julie Adams & Adam D. Read & P. Chris Coggins, 2003. "County waste minimization programmes: a case study from Northamptonshire, UK," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 11(2), pages 103-118.
    6. Patrick McAlpine & Andrew Birnie, 2006. "Establishing sustainability indicators as an evolving process: experience from the island of Guernsey," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 14(2), pages 81-92.
    7. Mark Hall & David Purchase, 2006. "Building or bodging? Attitudes to sustainability in UK public sector housing construction development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 14(3), pages 205-218.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Beatriz Cuadrado-Ballesteros & Noemí Mordán & Isabel-María García-Sánchez, 2014. "Is Local Financial Health Associated with Citizens’ Quality of Life?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 119(2), pages 559-580, November.
    2. Adriane MacDonald & Amelia Clarke & Lei Huang, 2019. "Multi-stakeholder Partnerships for Sustainability: Designing Decision-Making Processes for Partnership Capacity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 160(2), pages 409-426, December.
    3. Jose Manuel Diaz-Sarachaga, 2019. "Analysis of the Local Agenda 21 in Madrid Compared with Other Global Actions in Sustainable Development," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-16, September.
    4. Ev Kirst & Daniel J. Lang, 2019. "Perspectives on Comprehensive Sustainability-Orientation in Municipalities: Structuring Existing Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-21, February.
    5. Luis Velázquez & Nora Munguía & Andrea Zavala & Maria de los Ángeles Navarrete, 2008. "Challenges in operating sustainability initiatives in Northwest Mexico," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(6), pages 401-409.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jose M. Barrutia & Carmen Echebarria & Patrick Hartmann & Vanessa Apaolaza & Ainhize Eletxigerra & Alexander Velez, 2015. "Towards Territorial Sustainability Systems: A step forward," ERSA conference papers ersa15p1238, European Regional Science Association.
    2. José Manuel Prado Lorenzo & Isabel María Garcia Sanchez, 2007. "The effect of Participation in the Development of Local Agenda 21 in the European Union," Post-Print halshs-00519902, HAL.
    3. Michael Howes & Liana Wortley & Ruth Potts & Aysin Dedekorkut-Howes & Silvia Serrao-Neumann & Julie Davidson & Timothy Smith & Patrick Nunn, 2017. "Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-17, January.
    4. Carmen Echebarria & Jose M. Barrutia, 2013. "Factors Affecting the Attitude of Local Authorities towards Local Agenda 21," ERSA conference papers ersa13p1082, European Regional Science Association.
    5. Karla Guzmán Fernández & Ana I. Moreno-Calles & Alejandro Casas & José Blancas, 2020. "Contributions of Urban Collective Gardens to Local Sustainability in Mexico City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-23, September.
    6. Han-Shen Chen & Wan-Yu Liu & Chi-Ming Hsieh, 2017. "Integrating Ecosystem Services and Eco-Security to Assess Sustainable Development in Liuqiu Island," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-14, June.
    7. Umberto Berardi, 2013. "Sustainability assessment of urban communities through rating systems," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 15(6), pages 1573-1591, December.
    8. Jenny Palm & Karolina Södergren & Nancy Bocken, 2019. "The Role of Cities in the Sharing Economy: Exploring Modes of Governance in Urban Sharing Practices," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-12, December.
    9. William Blomquist & Elinor Ostrom, 2008. "Deliberation, learning, and institutional change: the evolution of institutions in judicial settings," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 180-202, September.
    10. Trigo, Ana & Marta-Costa, Ana & Fragoso, Rui, 2023. "Improving sustainability assessment: A context-oriented classification analysis for the wine industry," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    11. Nur Fatin Syazwani Abu Bakar* & Syuhaida Ismail & Rohayah Che Amat & Serdar Durdyev, 2018. "Sustainable Construction in Malaysian Mixed Development Projects: The Barriers and Critical Success Factors," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 885-892:6.
    12. Muyeba, Singumbe, 2019. "Institutional capital, urban poverty and household wealth in Cape Town," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 16(C).
    13. Marula Tsagkari & Jordi Roca & Phedeas Stephanides, 2022. "Sustainability of local renewable energy projects: A comprehensive framework and an empirical analysis on two islands," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(5), pages 1155-1168, October.
    14. Ness, Barry & Urbel-Piirsalu, Evelin & Anderberg, Stefan & Olsson, Lennart, 2007. "Categorising tools for sustainability assessment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 498-508, January.
    15. Coskeran, Thomas & Smith, Steve & Phillips, Paul, 2007. "An economic modelling approach to the design and delivery of sustainable waste minimisation clubs: Prospects in the new policy framework," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 50(4), pages 398-414.
    16. Marko Joas & Bob Evans & Kate Theobald, 2007. "Local Agenda 21 in Europe. The second phase of ecological modernisation in local government (English version)," EKONOMIAZ. Revista vasca de Economía, Gobierno Vasco / Eusko Jaurlaritza / Basque Government, vol. 64(01), pages 92-105.
    17. Adriano Ferreira Souza & Alan Cavalcanti Cunha & Helenilza Ferreira Albuquerque Cunha, 2021. "The environmental attitude of the urban population living in Macapá City, Brazilian Amazon region," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(10), pages 15100-15117, October.
    18. Abood Khaled Alamoudi & Rotimi Boluwatife Abidoye & Terence Y. M. Lam, 2023. "Implementing Smart Sustainable Cities in Saudi Arabia: A Framework for Citizens’ Participation towards SAUDI VISION 2030," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-21, April.
    19. Wallis, Anne M. & Graymore, Michelle L.M. & Richards, Anneke J., 2011. "Significance of environment in the assessment of sustainable development: The case for south west Victoria," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(4), pages 595-605, February.
    20. Soyoung Han & Jisoo Sim & Yoonku Kwon, 2021. "Recognition Changes of the Concept of Urban Resilience: Moderating Effects of COVID-19 Pandemic," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:16:y:2008:i:1:p:17-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.