IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v14y2006i3p205-218.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Building or bodging? Attitudes to sustainability in UK public sector housing construction development

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Hall

    (Department of Management, University of Bristol, UK)

  • David Purchase

    (Independent Consultant, UK)

Abstract

The UK government has established an agenda for 'greening' government activity and, as it accounts for approximately 40% of all UK construction procurement, is actively encouraging sustainability initiatives in this particular sector. However, there have been criticisms of its approach. The UK government anticipates investing approximately £3 billion in the social housing sector over the next three years and, as a prelude to this, has asked the Housing Corporation to promote a raft of sustainable development initiatives. This paper draws on two tranches of data in order to examine the impact of the UK government's sustainability policy on the way the public sector procures housing construction. The first of these is the sustainability improvement targets from 143 public sector housing associations. The evidence from this first tranche of data suggests that sustainability is currently seen as a low priority and that government initiatives have yet to make a significant impact. The second tranche of data uses comments from housing association development managers to examine the reasons for this apparent lack of impact. This focuses on their views and opinions of sustainability as an issue in social housing development and enables inferences to be made about their attitudes to this issue. There has been criticism about the lack of progress so far seen and the results in this paper suggest that this criticism is justified. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Hall & David Purchase, 2006. "Building or bodging? Attitudes to sustainability in UK public sector housing construction development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 14(3), pages 205-218.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:14:y:2006:i:3:p:205-218
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.265
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/sd.265
    File Function: Link to full text; subscription required
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.265?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Selman, 1998. "Local Agenda 21: Substance or Spin?," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(5), pages 533-553.
    2. J. Mawson, 1998. "Policy review section," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(2), pages 175-197.
    3. J. Mawson, 1998. "Policy review section," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(8), pages 769-787.
    4. J. Mawson, 1998. "Policy review section," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1), pages 73-91.
    5. J. Mawson, 1998. "Policy review section," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(6), pages 559-577, August.
    6. A. J. Bond, 1998. "Policy And Practice The Focus of Local Agenda 21 in the United Kingdom," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(6), pages 767-776.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ali M. Saad & Mohammed Dulaimi & Sambo Lyson Zulu, 2023. "Examining the Influence of UK Public Clients’ Characteristics on Their Own Innovation-Decision towards the Modern Methods of Construction (MMC)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-25, February.
    2. Walker, Helen & Brammer, Stephen, 2012. "The relationship between sustainable procurement and e-procurement in the public sector," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 256-268.
    3. Isabel M. Garcia-Sanchez & Jose-Manuel Prado-Lorenzo, 2008. "Determinant factors in the degree of implementation of Local Agenda 21 in the European Union," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(1), pages 17-34.
    4. Nur Fatin Syazwani Abu Bakar* & Syuhaida Ismail & Rohayah Che Amat & Serdar Durdyev, 2018. "Sustainable Construction in Malaysian Mixed Development Projects: The Barriers and Critical Success Factors," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 885-892:6.
    5. Testa, Francesco & Iraldo, Fabio & Frey, Marco & Daddi, Tiberio, 2012. "What factors influence the uptake of GPP (green public procurement) practices? New evidence from an Italian survey," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 88-96.
    6. Wim Lambrechts & Andrew Mitchell & Mark Lemon & Muhammad Usman Mazhar & Ward Ooms & Rikkert van Heerde, 2021. "The Transition of Dutch Social Housing Corporations to Sustainable Business Models for New Buildings and Retrofits," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-24, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John McCarthy Shaw & David Newlands, 1999. "An Economic and Spatial Policy Agenda for the Scottish Parliament," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(9), pages 891-895.
    2. José Manuel Prado Lorenzo & Isabel María Garcia Sanchez, 2007. "The effect of Participation in the Development of Local Agenda 21 in the European Union," Post-Print halshs-00519902, HAL.
    3. Tassilo Herrschel, 2013. "Competitiveness AND Sustainability: Can ‘Smart City Regionalism’ Square the Circle?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(11), pages 2332-2348, August.
    4. Patricia Romero-Lankao & Daniel M. Gnatz & Olga Wilhelmi & Mary Hayden, 2016. "Urban Sustainability and Resilience: From Theory to Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-19, November.
    5. Xinyu Sun & Amelia Clarke & Adriane MacDonald, 2020. "Implementing Community Sustainability Plans through Partnership: Examining the Relationship between Partnership Structural Features and Climate Change Mitigation Outcomes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-20, July.
    6. Duc Binh Tran & Van Tan Tran & Xuan Anh Pham & Van Tuan Nguyen, 2023. "A General Framework for Sustainability Assessment of Buildings: A Life-Cycle Thinking Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-21, July.
    7. Jose M. Barrutia & Carmen Echebarria & Patrick Hartmann & Vanessa Apaolaza & Ainhize Eletxigerra & Alexander Velez, 2015. "Towards Territorial Sustainability Systems: A step forward," ERSA conference papers ersa15p1238, European Regional Science Association.
    8. van Doren, Didi & Driessen, Peter P.J. & Runhaar, Hens A.C. & Giezen, Mendel, 2020. "Learning within local government to promote the scaling-up of low-carbon initiatives: A case study in the City of Copenhagen," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    9. David Ockwell, 2008. "‘Opening up’ policy to reflexive appraisal: a role for Q Methodology? A case study of fire management in Cape York, Australia," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 41(4), pages 263-292, December.
    10. Thomas Hickmann, 2021. "Locating Cities and Their Governments in Multi-Level Sustainability Governance," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(1), pages 211-220.
    11. Eurydice Bled & Igor Alvarez & David Carassus & Jacques Jaussaud, 2017. "French smart cities : which factors are key to manage a sustainable development?," Post-Print hal-02142219, HAL.
    12. Michal Lyons & Carin Smuts & Anthea Stephens, 2001. "Participation, Empowerment and Sustainability: (How) Do the Links Work?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 38(8), pages 1233-1251, July.
    13. Adriane MacDonald & Amelia Clarke & Lei Huang, 2019. "Multi-stakeholder Partnerships for Sustainability: Designing Decision-Making Processes for Partnership Capacity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 160(2), pages 409-426, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:14:y:2006:i:3:p:205-218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.