IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v37y2017i2p206-218.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Economic Impact of Space Weather: Where Do We Stand?

Author

Listed:
  • J. P. Eastwood
  • E. Biffis
  • M. A. Hapgood
  • L. Green
  • M. M. Bisi
  • R. D. Bentley
  • R. Wicks
  • L.‐A. McKinnell
  • M. Gibbs
  • C. Burnett

Abstract

Space weather describes the way in which the Sun, and conditions in space more generally, impact human activity and technology both in space and on the ground. It is now well understood that space weather represents a significant threat to infrastructure resilience, and is a source of risk that is wide‐ranging in its impact and the pathways by which this impact may occur. Although space weather is growing rapidly as a field, work rigorously assessing the overall economic cost of space weather appears to be in its infancy. Here, we provide an initial literature review to gather and assess the quality of any published assessments of space weather impacts and socioeconomic studies. Generally speaking, there is a good volume of scientific peer‐reviewed literature detailing the likelihood and statistics of different types of space weather phenomena. These phenomena all typically exhibit “power‐law” behavior in their severity. The literature on documented impacts is not as extensive, with many case studies, but few statistical studies. The literature on the economic impacts of space weather is rather sparse and not as well developed when compared to the other sections, most probably due to the somewhat limited data that are available from end‐users. The major risk is attached to power distribution systems and there is disagreement as to the severity of the technological footprint. This strongly controls the economic impact. Consequently, urgent work is required to better quantify the risk of future space weather events.

Suggested Citation

  • J. P. Eastwood & E. Biffis & M. A. Hapgood & L. Green & M. M. Bisi & R. D. Bentley & R. Wicks & L.‐A. McKinnell & M. Gibbs & C. Burnett, 2017. "The Economic Impact of Space Weather: Where Do We Stand?," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(2), pages 206-218, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:37:y:2017:i:2:p:206-218
    DOI: 10.1111/risa.12765
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12765
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/risa.12765?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mike Hapgood, 2012. "Prepare for the coming space weather storm," Nature, Nature, vol. 484(7394), pages 311-313, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Agnieszka Gil & Monika Berendt-Marchel & Renata Modzelewska & Agnieszka Siluszyk & Marek Siluszyk & Anna Wawrzaszek & Anna Wawrzynczak, 2023. "Review of Geomagnetically Induced Current Proxies in Mid-Latitude European Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-22, November.
    2. Edward J. Oughton & Mike Hapgood & Gemma S. Richardson & Ciarán D. Beggan & Alan W. P. Thomson & Mark Gibbs & Catherine Burnett & C. Trevor Gaunt & Markos Trichas & Rabia Dada & Richard B. Horne, 2019. "A Risk Assessment Framework for the Socioeconomic Impacts of Electricity Transmission Infrastructure Failure Due to Space Weather: An Application to the United Kingdom," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(5), pages 1022-1043, May.
    3. Michael Greenberg & Anthony Cox & Vicki Bier & Jim Lambert & Karen Lowrie & Warner North & Michael Siegrist & Felicia Wu, 2020. "Risk Analysis: Celebrating the Accomplishments and Embracing Ongoing Challenges," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(S1), pages 2113-2127, November.
    4. Ross, Gordon J., 2020. "Self-excitation in the solar flare waiting time distribution," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 556(C).
    5. Edward J. Oughton, 2021. "The Economic Impact of Critical National Infrastructure Failure Due to Space Weather," Papers 2106.08945, arXiv.org.
    6. Agnieszka Gil & Renata Modzelewska & Szczepan Moskwa & Agnieszka Siluszyk & Marek Siluszyk & Anna Wawrzynczak & Mariusz Pozoga & Sebastian Domijanski, 2020. "Transmission Lines in Poland and Space Weather Effects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-13, May.
    7. Broome, James David & Cook, David & Davíðsdóttir, Brynhildur, 2024. "Heavenly lights: An exploratory review of auroral ecosystem services and disservices," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    8. Kathrin Kirchen & William Harbert & Jay Apt & M. Granger Morgan, 2020. "A Solar‐Centric Approach to Improving Estimates of Exposure Processes for Coronal Mass Ejections," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(5), pages 1020-1039, May.
    9. Daglis, Theodoros & Konstantakis, Konstantinos N. & Michaelides, Panayotis G. & Papadakis, Theodoulos Eleftherios, 2020. "The forecasting ability of solar and space weather data on NASDAQ’s finance sector price index volatility," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    10. Daglis, Theodoros & Konstantakis, Konstantinos N. & Michaelides, Panayotis G., 2019. "Solar events and economic activity: Evidence from the US Telecommunications industry (1996–2014)," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 534(C).
    11. Jacek Buko & Jarosław Duda & Adam Makowski, 2021. "Food Production Security in Times of a Long-Term Energy Shortage Crisis: The Example of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-12, August.
    12. Tong Wu & Zhe You & Mengqi Gong & Jinhua Cheng, 2021. "Star Wars? Space Weather and Electricity Market: Evidence from China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-14, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Samuel Averitt & Erik Dahl & Daniel Eisenberg, 2023. "The Electromagnetic Threat to the US: Resilience Strategy Recommendations," Journal of Critical Infrastructure Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(2), pages 125-150, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:37:y:2017:i:2:p:206-218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.