IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v35y2015i1p19-20.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Our Knowledge of the World is Often Not Simple: Policymakers Should Not Duck that Fact, But Should Deal with It

Author

Listed:
  • M. Granger Morgan

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • M. Granger Morgan, 2015. "Our Knowledge of the World is Often Not Simple: Policymakers Should Not Duck that Fact, But Should Deal with It," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(1), pages 19-20, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:35:y:2015:i:1:p:19-20
    DOI: 10.1111/risa.12306
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12306
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/risa.12306?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Granger Morgan & Samuel C. Morris & Max Henrion & Deborah A. L. Amaral & William R. Rish, 1984. "Technical Uncertainty in Quantitative Policy Analysis — A Sulfur Air Pollution Example," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(3), pages 201-216, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bistline, John E.T. & Brown, Maxwell & Siddiqui, Sauleh A. & Vaillancourt, Kathleen, 2020. "Electric sector impacts of renewable policy coordination: A multi-model study of the North American energy system," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    2. Gregory F. Nemet & Laura Diaz Anadon & Elena Verdolini, 2017. "Quantifying the Effects of Expert Selection and Elicitation Design on Experts’ Confidence in Their Judgments About Future Energy Technologies," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(2), pages 315-330, February.
    3. Anca M. Hanea & Marissa F. McBride & Mark A. Burgman & Bonnie C. Wintle, 2018. "The Value of Performance Weights and Discussion in Aggregated Expert Judgments," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(9), pages 1781-1794, September.
    4. Hamid Soleimani & Daryoush Habibi & Mehrdad Ghahramani & Asma Aziz, 2024. "Strengthening Power Systems for Net Zero: A Review of the Role of Synchronous Condensers and Emerging Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-23, July.
    5. Anne E. Smith, 2018. "Setting Air Quality Standards for PM2.5: A Role for Subjective Uncertainty in NAAQS Quantitative Risk Assessments?," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(11), pages 2318-2339, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Neal Fann & Elisabeth A. Gilmore & Katherine Walker, 2016. "Characterizing the Long‐Term PM2.5 Concentration‐Response Function: Comparing the Strengths and Weaknesses of Research Synthesis Approaches," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(9), pages 1693-1707, September.
    2. James K. Hammitt, 1990. "Subjective‐Probability‐Based Scenarios for Uncertain Input Parameters: Stratospheric Ozone Depletion," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(1), pages 93-102, March.
    3. S.Y. Jimmy Chan, 1993. "An Alternative Approach to the Modeling of Probability Distributions," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(1), pages 97-102, February.
    4. Henry A. Roman & James K. Hammitt & Tyra L. Walsh & David M. Stieb, 2012. "Expert Elicitation of the Value per Statistical Life in an Air Pollution Context," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(12), pages 2133-2151, December.
    5. Vincent T. Covello, 1987. "Decision Analysis and Risk Management Decision Making: Issues and Methods," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(2), pages 131-139, June.
    6. Elizabeth A. Casman & Minh Ha‐Duong & M. Granger Morgan, 2004. "Response to Sander Greenland's Critique of Bounding Analysis," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(5), pages 1093-1095, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:35:y:2015:i:1:p:19-20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.