IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v29y2009i3p457-467.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Calibration of FISK, an Invasiveness Screening Tool for Nonnative Freshwater Fishes

Author

Listed:
  • Gordon H. Copp
  • Lorenzo Vilizzi
  • John Mumford
  • Gemma V. Fenwick
  • Michael J. Godard
  • Rodolphe E. Gozlan

Abstract

Adapted from the weed risk assessment (WRA) of Pheloung, Williams, and Halloy, the fish invasiveness scoring kit (FISK) was proposed as a screening tool for freshwater fishes. This article describes improvements to FISK, in particular the incorporation of confidence (certainty/uncertainty) ranking of the assessors' responses, and reports on the calibration of the score system, specifically: determination of most appropriate score thresholds for classifying nonnative species into low‐, medium‐, and high‐risk categories, assessment of the patterns of assessors' confidences in their responses in the FISK assessments. Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, FISK was demonstrated to distinguish accurately (and with statistical confidence) between potentially invasive and noninvasive species of nonnative fishes, with the statistically appropriate threshold score for high‐risk species scores being ≥19. Within the group of species classed as high risk using this new threshold, a “higher risk” category could be visually identified, at present consisting of two species (topmouth gudgeon Pseudorasbora parva and gibel carp Carassius gibelio). FISK represents a useful and viable tool to aid decision‐ and policymakers in assessing and classifying freshwater fishes according to their potential invasiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Gordon H. Copp & Lorenzo Vilizzi & John Mumford & Gemma V. Fenwick & Michael J. Godard & Rodolphe E. Gozlan, 2009. "Calibration of FISK, an Invasiveness Screening Tool for Nonnative Freshwater Fishes," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3), pages 457-467, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:29:y:2009:i:3:p:457-467
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01159.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01159.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01159.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas J. Stohlgren & John L. Schnase, 2006. "Risk Analysis for Biological Hazards: What We Need to Know about Invasive Species," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1), pages 163-173, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David Makowski & Murthy Narasimha Mittinty, 2010. "Comparison of Scoring Systems for Invasive Pests Using ROC Analysis and Monte Carlo Simulations," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(6), pages 906-915, June.
    2. David Almeida & Filipe Ribeiro & Pedro M. Leunda & Lorenzo Vilizzi & Gordon H. Copp, 2013. "Effectiveness of FISK, an Invasiveness Screening Tool for Non‐Native Freshwater Fishes, to Perform Risk Identification Assessments in the Iberian Peninsula," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(8), pages 1404-1413, August.
    3. Riikka Puntila & Lorenzo Vilizzi & Maiju Lehtiniemi & Gordon H. Copp, 2013. "First Application of FISK, the Freshwater Fish Invasiveness Screening Kit, in Northern Europe: Example of Southern Finland," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(8), pages 1397-1403, August.
    4. Larry L. Lawson & Jeffrey E. Hill & Lorenzo Vilizzi & Scott Hardin & Gordon H. Copp, 2013. "Revisions of the Fish Invasiveness Screening Kit (FISK) for its Application in Warmer Climatic Zones, with Particular Reference to Peninsular Florida," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(8), pages 1414-1431, August.
    5. Sercan Yapici, 2021. "A Risk Screening of Potential Invasiveness of Alien and Neonative Marine Fishes in the Mediterranean Sea: Implications for Sustainable Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-12, December.
    6. Gordon H. Copp, 2013. "The Fish Invasiveness Screening Kit (FISK) for Non‐Native Freshwater Fishes—A Summary of Current Applications," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(8), pages 1394-1396, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Denys Yemshanov & Frank H. Koch & Yakov Ben‐Haim & Marla Downing & Frank Sapio & Marty Siltanen, 2013. "A New Multicriteria Risk Mapping Approach Based on a Multiattribute Frontier Concept," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(9), pages 1694-1709, September.
    2. McDermott, Shana M. & Finnoff, David C. & Shogren, Jason F. & Kennedy, Chris J., 2021. "When does natural science uncertainty translate into economic uncertainty?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    3. Denys Yemshanov & Frank H. Koch & Yakov Ben‐Haim & William D. Smith, 2010. "Robustness of Risk Maps and Survey Networks to Knowledge Gaps About a New Invasive Pest," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 261-276, February.
    4. Cory J. Lindgren, 2012. "Biosecurity Policy and the Use of Geospatial Predictive Tools to Address Invasive Plants: Updating the Risk Analysis Toolbox," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(1), pages 9-15, January.
    5. Wanwan Liang & Liem Tran & Jerome Grant & Vivek Srivastava, 2020. "Estimating Invasion Dynamics with Geopolitical Unit-Level Records: The Optimal Method Depends on Irregularity and Stochasticity of Spread," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-17, October.
    6. Gilberto Montibeller & L. Alberto Franco & Ashley Carreras, 2020. "A Risk Analysis Framework for Prioritizing and Managing Biosecurity Threats," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(11), pages 2462-2477, November.
    7. Onur Selcuk & Hatice Karakas & Beykan Cizel & Emre Ipekci Cetin, 2023. "How does tourism affect protected areas?: A multi-criteria decision making application in UNESCO natural heritage sites," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 117(2), pages 1923-1944, June.
    8. Amanda M. West & Catherine S. Jarnevich & Nicholas E. Young & Pam L. Fuller, 2019. "Evaluating Potential Distribution of High‐Risk Aquatic Invasive Species in the Water Garden and Aquarium Trade at a Global Scale Based on Current Established Populations," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(5), pages 1169-1191, May.
    9. Thomas J. Stohlgren & Peter Ma & Sunil Kumar & Monique Rocca & Jeffrey T. Morisette & Catherine S. Jarnevich & Nate Benson, 2010. "Ensemble Habitat Mapping of Invasive Plant Species," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 224-235, February.
    10. Elena Tricarico & Lorenzo Vilizzi & Francesca Gherardi & Gordon H. Copp, 2010. "Calibration of FI‐ISK, an Invasiveness Screening Tool for Nonnative Freshwater Invertebrates," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 285-292, February.
    11. Terry Walshe & Mark Burgman, 2010. "A Framework for Assessing and Managing Risks Posed by Emerging Diseases," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 236-249, February.
    12. Nicholas E Young & Catherine S Jarnevich & Helen R Sofaer & Ian Pearse & Julia Sullivan & Peder Engelstad & Thomas J Stohlgren, 2020. "A modeling workflow that balances automation and human intervention to inform invasive plant management decisions at multiple spatial scales," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, March.
    13. Jim Graham & Greg Newman & Sunil Kumar & Catherine Jarnevich & Nick Young & Alycia Crall & Thomas J. Stohlgren & Paul Evangelista, 2010. "Bringing Modeling to the Masses: A Web Based System to Predict Potential Species Distributions," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-11, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:29:y:2009:i:3:p:457-467. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.