IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v28y2008i1p49-67.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Fuzzy Decision Tree for Fault Classification

Author

Listed:
  • Enrico Zio
  • Piero Baraldi
  • Irina C. Popescu

Abstract

In plant accident management, the control room operators are required to identify the causes of the accident, based on the different patterns of evolution of the monitored process variables thereby developing. This task is often quite challenging, given the large number of process parameters monitored and the intense emotional states under which it is performed. To aid the operators, various techniques of fault classification have been engineered. An important requirement for their practical application is the physical interpretability of the relationships among the process variables underpinning the fault classification. In this view, the present work propounds a fuzzy approach to fault classification, which relies on fuzzy if‐then rules inferred from the clustering of available preclassified signal data, which are then organized in a logical and transparent decision tree structure. The advantages offered by the proposed approach are precisely that a transparent fault classification model is mined out of the signal data and that the underlying physical relationships among the process variables are easily interpretable as linguistic if‐then rules that can be explicitly visualized in the decision tree structure. The approach is applied to a case study regarding the classification of simulated faults in the feedwater system of a boiling water reactor.

Suggested Citation

  • Enrico Zio & Piero Baraldi & Irina C. Popescu, 2008. "A Fuzzy Decision Tree for Fault Classification," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1), pages 49-67, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:28:y:2008:i:1:p:49-67
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01002.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01002.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01002.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kim, Kyungmee O. & Zuo, Ming J., 2007. "Two fault classification methods for large systems when available data are limited," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(5), pages 585-592.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chai, Naijie & Zhou, Wenliang & Hu, Xinlei, 2022. "Safety evaluation of urban rail transit operation considering uncertainty and risk preference: A case study in China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 267-288.
    2. Zaitseva, Elena & Levashenko, Vitaly & Rabcan, Jan, 2023. "A new method for analysis of Multi-State systems based on Multi-valued decision diagram under epistemic uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gómez, M.J. & Castejón, C. & García-Prada, J.C., 2016. "Automatic condition monitoring system for crack detection in rotating machinery," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 239-247.
    2. Huang, Keke & Tao, Shijun & Wu, Dehao & Yang, Chunhua & Gui, Weihua, 2024. "Robust condition identification against label noise in industrial processes based on trusted connection dictionary learning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    3. Lu, Lu & Xu, Zhengguo & Wang, Wenhai & Sun, Youxian, 2013. "A new fault detection method for computer networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 45-51.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:28:y:2008:i:1:p:49-67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.