IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v27y2007i6p1581-1596.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment Model for Legionnaires' Disease: Animal Model Selection and Dose‐Response Modeling

Author

Listed:
  • T. W. Armstrong
  • C. N. Haas

Abstract

Legionnaires' disease (LD), first reported in 1976, is an atypical pneumonia caused by bacteria of the genus Legionella, and most frequently by L. pneumophila (Lp). Subsequent research on exposure to the organism employed various animal models, and with quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) techniques, the animal model data may provide insights on human dose‐response for LD. This article focuses on the rationale for selection of the guinea pig model, comparison of the dose‐response model results, comparison of projected low‐dose responses for guinea pigs, and risk estimates for humans. Based on both in vivo and in vitro comparisons, the guinea pig (Cavia porcellus) dose‐response data were selected for modeling human risk. We completed dose‐response modeling for the β‐Poisson (approximate and exact), exponential, probit, logistic, and Weibull models for Lp inhalation, mortality, and infection (end point elevated body temperature) in guinea pigs. For mechanistic reasons, including low‐dose exposure probability, further work on human risk estimates for LD employed the exponential and β‐Poisson models. With an exposure of 10 colony‐forming units (CFU) (retained dose), the QMRA model predicted a mild infection risk of 0.4 (as evaluated by seroprevalence) and a clinical severity LD case (e.g., hospitalization and supportive care) risk of 0.0009. The calculated rates based on estimated human exposures for outbreaks used for the QMRA model validation are within an order of magnitude of the reported LD rates. These validation results suggest the LD QMRA animal model selection, dose‐response modeling, and extension to human risk projections were appropriate.

Suggested Citation

  • T. W. Armstrong & C. N. Haas, 2007. "A Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment Model for Legionnaires' Disease: Animal Model Selection and Dose‐Response Modeling," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 1581-1596, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:27:y:2007:i:6:p:1581-1596
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00990.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00990.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00990.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gin Nam Sze‐To & Christopher Y. H. Chao, 2011. "Use of Risk Assessment and Likelihood Estimation to Analyze Spatial Distribution Pattern of Respiratory Infection Cases," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 351-369, March.
    2. Richard Bentham & Harriet Whiley, 2018. "Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment and Opportunist Waterborne Infections–Are There Too Many Gaps to Fill?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-11, June.
    3. Bidya Prasad & Kerry A. Hamilton & Charles N. Haas, 2017. "Incorporating Time‐Dose‐Response into Legionella Outbreak Models," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(2), pages 291-304, February.
    4. Siming You & Man Pun Wan, 2015. "A Risk Assessment Scheme of Infection Transmission Indoors Incorporating the Impact of Resuspension," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(8), pages 1488-1502, August.
    5. Christopher Leleu & Jean Menotti & Pascale Meneceur & Firas Choukri & Annie Sulahian & Yves Jean‐François Garin & Jean‐Baptiste Denis & Francis Derouin, 2013. "Bayesian Development of a Dose‐Response Model for Aspergillus fumigatus and Invasive Aspergillosis," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(8), pages 1441-1453, August.
    6. Toru Watanabe & Timothy A. Bartrand & Mark H. Weir & Tatsuo Omura & Charles N. Haas, 2010. "Development of a Dose‐Response Model for SARS Coronavirus," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(7), pages 1129-1138, July.
    7. Agung Kusumawardhana & Ljiljana Zlatanovic & Arne Bosch & Jan Peter van der Hoek, 2021. "Microbiological Health Risk Assessment of Water Conservation Strategies: A Case Study in Amsterdam," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-17, March.
    8. Steven Dyke & Iain Barrass & Kevin Pollock & Ian M Hall, 2019. "Dispersion of Legionella bacteria in atmosphere: A practical source location estimation method," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-14, November.
    9. Sarah C. Taft & Stephanie A. Hines, 2012. "Benchmark Dose Analysis for Bacillus anthracis Inhalation Exposures in the Nonhuman Primate," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(10), pages 1750-1768, October.
    10. Ileana Federigi & Osvalda De Giglio & Giusy Diella & Francesco Triggiano & Francesca Apollonio & Marilena D’Ambrosio & Lorenzo Cioni & Marco Verani & Maria Teresa Montagna & Annalaura Carducci, 2022. "Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment Applied to Legionella Contamination on Long-Distance Public Transport," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-12, February.
    11. Martijn Bouwknegt & Jack F. Schijven & Johanna A.C. Schalk & Ana Maria de Roda Husman, 2013. "Quantitative Risk Estimation for a Legionella pneumophila Infection Due to Whirlpool Use," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(7), pages 1228-1236, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:27:y:2007:i:6:p:1581-1596. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.