IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v25y2005i3p753-766.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Ecological Risk Assessment of Nonnative Boas and Pythons as Potentially Invasive Species in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Robert N. Reed

Abstract

The growing international trade in live wildlife has the potential to result in continuing establishment of nonnative animal populations in the United States. Snakes may pose particularly high risks as potentially invasive species, as exemplified by the decimation of Guam's vertebrate fauna by the accidentally introduced brown tree snake. Herein, ecological and commercial predictors of the likelihood of establishment of invasive populations were used to model risk associated with legal commercial imports of 23 species of boas, pythons, and relatives into the United States during the period 1989–2000. Data on ecological variables were collected from multiple sources, while data on commercial variables were collated from import records maintained by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Results of the risk‐assessment models indicate that species including boa constrictors (Boa constrictor), ball pythons (Python regius), and reticulated pythons (P. reticulatus) may pose particularly high risks as potentially invasive species. Recommendations for reducing risk of establishment of invasive populations of snakes and/or pathogens include temporary quarantine of imports to increase detection rates of nonnative pathogens, increasing research attention to reptile pathogens, reducing the risk that nonnative snakes will reach certain areas with high numbers of federally listed species (such as the Florida Keys), and attempting to better educate individuals purchasing reptiles.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert N. Reed, 2005. "An Ecological Risk Assessment of Nonnative Boas and Pythons as Potentially Invasive Species in the United States," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(3), pages 753-766, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:25:y:2005:i:3:p:753-766
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00621.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00621.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00621.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark E. Torchin & Kevin D. Lafferty & Andrew P. Dobson & Valerie J. McKenzie & Armand M. Kuris, 2003. "Introduced species and their missing parasites," Nature, Nature, vol. 421(6923), pages 628-630, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna C. Peterson & Himanshu Sharma & Arvind Kumar & Bruno M. Ghersi & Scott J. Emrich & Kurt J. Vandegrift & Amit Kapoor & Michael J. Blum, 2021. "Rodent Virus Diversity and Differentiation across Post-Katrina New Orleans," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Strona, Giovanni, 2015. "A spatially explicit model to investigate how dispersal/colonization tradeoffs between short and long distance movement strategies affect species ranges," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 297(C), pages 80-85.
    3. Long, Zachary T. & Leroux, Shawn J. & Faninger, Thibault & Loreau, Michel, 2012. "Interactive effects of nutrient enrichment and the manipulation of intermediate hosts by parasites on infection prevalence and food web structure," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 1-7.
    4. Buhle, Eric & Margolis, Michael & Ruesink, Jennifer L., 2004. "Bang for the Buck: Cost-Effective Control of Invasive Species with Different Life Histories," Discussion Papers 10793, Resources for the Future.
    5. Hannah R Windley & Mandy C Barron & E Penelope Holland & Danswell Starrs & Wendy A Ruscoe & William J Foley, 2016. "Foliar Nutritional Quality Explains Patchy Browsing Damage Caused by an Invasive Mammal," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-16, May.
    6. Buhle, Eric R. & Margolis, Michael & Ruesink, Jennifer L., 2005. "Bang for buck: cost-effective control of invasive species with different life histories," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 355-366, February.
    7. Lucas N Joppa & Rich Williams, 2013. "Modeling the Building Blocks of Biodiversity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(2), pages 1-11, February.
    8. Gerardo Ivan Zardi & Katy Rebecca Nicastro & Christopher David McQuaid & Marcos Gektidis, 2009. "Effects of Endolithic Parasitism on Invasive and Indigenous Mussels in a Variable Physical Environment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(8), pages 1-10, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:25:y:2005:i:3:p:753-766. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.