IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/reggov/v17y2023i2p491-511.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Expert network interaction in the European Medicines Agency

Author

Listed:
  • Reini Schrama

Abstract

The need for supranational regulatory capacity and the drive for governmental control are two colliding forces in international governance. As a solution to this governance dilemma, European administrative networks need to simultaneously fulfill the demand for supranational institutions and maintain governmental control. The assessment of risks associated with medicines authorized on the European market is carried out by such a network of national regulators as part of the European Medicines Agency. To uncover how these double‐hatted experts navigate the opportunity structures created by supranational and intergovernmental forces, this study employs social network analysis. Developing exponential random graph models, this study tests to what extent members can act as professional experts in service of the supranational administration and to what extent national features shape interaction. The results indicate that while PRAC members are socialized as professionals in service of supranational deliberation on pharmacovigilance, intergovernmental forces do structure their interactions.

Suggested Citation

  • Reini Schrama, 2023. "Expert network interaction in the European Medicines Agency," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(2), pages 491-511, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:reggov:v:17:y:2023:i:2:p:491-511
    DOI: 10.1111/rego.12466
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12466
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rego.12466?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Morten Egeberg & Jarle Trondal, 2017. "Researching European Union Agencies: What Have We Learnt (and Where Do We Go from Here)?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(4), pages 675-690, July.
    2. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:47:y:2009:i::p:719-740 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. David Bach & Abraham Newman, 2014. "Domestic drivers of transgovernmental regulatory cooperation," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(4), pages 395-417, December.
    4. Casper, Steven & Matraves, Catherine, 2003. "Institutional frameworks and innovation in the German and UK pharmaceutical industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(10), pages 1865-1879, December.
    5. Newman, Abraham L., 2008. "Building Transnational Civil Liberties: Transgovernmental Entrepreneurs and the European Data Privacy Directive," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 62(1), pages 103-130, January.
    6. Duxbury, Scott W, 2018. "Diagnosing Multicollinearity in Exponential Random Graph Models," SocArXiv 2tgm7, Center for Open Science.
    7. Giandomenico Majone, 2000. "The Credibility Crisis of Community Regulation," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 273-302, June.
    8. Philip Leifeld & Volker Schneider, 2012. "Information Exchange in Policy Networks," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(3), pages 731-744, July.
    9. Carpenter, Daniel P., 2004. "Protection without Capture: Product Approval by a Politically Responsive, Learning Regulator," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 98(4), pages 613-631, November.
    10. Igor Guardiancich & Mattia Guidi, 2016. "Formal independence of regulatory agencies and Varieties of Capitalism: A case of institutional complementarity?," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(3), pages 211-229, September.
    11. Christopher J. Bickerton & Dermot Hodson & Uwe Puetter, 2015. "The New Intergovernmentalism: European Integration in the Post-Maastricht Era," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(4), pages 703-722, July.
    12. Morten Egeberg, Guenther F. Schaefer & Jarle Trondal, 2003. "The many faces of EU committee governance," ARENA Working Papers 2, ARENA.
    13. Jens Blom‐Hansen & Gijs Jan Brandsma, 2009. "The EU Comitology System: Intergovernmental Bargaining and Deliberative Supranationalism?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(4), pages 719-740, September.
    14. Yannis Papadopoulos, 2018. "How does knowledge circulate in a regulatory network? Observing a European Platform of Regulatory Authorities meeting," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(4), pages 431-450, December.
    15. Efrat, Asif & Newman, Abraham L., 2016. "Deciding to Defer: The Importance of Fairness in Resolving Transnational Jurisdictional Conflicts," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 70(2), pages 409-441, April.
    16. Keohane, Robert O., 2001. "Governance in a Partially Globalized World," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 95(1), pages 1-13, March.
    17. Steven Goodreau & James Kitts & Martina Morris, 2009. "Birds of a feather, or friend of a friend? using exponential random graph models to investigate adolescent social networks," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 46(1), pages 103-125, February.
    18. Handcock, Mark S. & Hunter, David R. & Butts, Carter T. & Goodreau, Steven M. & Morris, Martina, 2008. "statnet: Software Tools for the Representation, Visualization, Analysis and Simulation of Network Data," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 24(i01).
    19. Mark Thatcher, 2007. "Regulatory Agencies, the State and Markets: A Franco-British Comparison," RSCAS Working Papers 2007/17, European University Institute.
    20. Stephen P. Borgatti, 2006. "Identifying sets of key players in a social network," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 21-34, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Reini Schrama & Dorte Sindbjerg Martinsen & Ellen Mastenbroek, 2020. "Going Nordic in European Administrative Networks?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 396-408.
    2. Reini Schrama & Dorte Sindbjerg Martinsen & Ellen Mastenbroek, 2022. "Networked Health Cooperation in the European Union: Horizontal or Hierarchical?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(5), pages 1488-1510, September.
    3. Reini Schrama & Dorte Sindbjerg Martinsen & Ellen Mastenbroek, 2020. "Going Nordic in European Administrative Networks?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 65-77.
    4. Duxbury, Scott W, 2019. "Mediation and Moderation in Statistical Network Models," SocArXiv 9bs4u, Center for Open Science.
    5. Marta Migliorati, 2020. "The Post‐agencification Stage between Reforms and Crises. A Comparative Assessment of EU agencies' Budgetary Development," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(6), pages 1393-1412, November.
    6. Torbjørg Jevnaker & Barbara Saerbeck, 2019. "EU Agencies and the Energy Union: Providing Useful Information to the Commission?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 60-69.
    7. Angel Ortiz-Pelaez & Getaneh Ashenafi & Francois Roger & Agnes Waret-Szkuta, 2012. "Can Geographical Factors Determine the Choices of Farmers in the Ethiopian Highlands to Trade in Livestock Markets?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(2), pages 1-11, February.
    8. Malte Möck, 2021. "Patterns of Policy Networks at the Local Level in Germany," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 38(4), pages 454-477, July.
    9. Rik Joosen & Asya Zhelyazkova, 2022. "How Do Supranational Regulators Keep Companies in Line? An Analysis of the Enforcement Styles of EU Agencies," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(4), pages 983-1000, July.
    10. Buket Oztas & Amie Kreppel, 2022. "Power or Luck? The Limitations of the European Commission's Agenda Setting Power and Autonomous Policy Influence," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(2), pages 408-426, March.
    11. Zack W. Almquist & Benjamin E. Bagozzi, 2019. "Using Radical Environmentalist Texts to Uncover Network Structure and Network Features," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 48(4), pages 905-960, November.
    12. Jarle Trondal & Thomas Tieku & Stefan Gänzle, 2023. "The organisational dimension of executive authority in the Global South: Insights from the AU and ECOWAS commissions," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(1), pages 31-47, February.
    13. Kim Yeaji & Antenangeli Leonardo & Kirkland Justin, 2016. "Measurement Error and Attenuation Bias in Exponential Random Graph Models," Statistics, Politics and Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1-2), pages 29-54, December.
    14. Fischer, Manuel, 2015. "Collaboration patterns, external shocks and uncertainty: Swiss nuclear energy politics before and after Fukushima," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 520-528.
    15. Richard A. Bettis & Constance E. Helfat & J. Myles Shaver & Anindya Ghosh & Ram Ranganathan & Lori Rosenkopf, 2016. "The impact of context and model choice on the determinants of strategic alliance formation: Evidence from a staged replication study," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(11), pages 2204-2221, November.
    16. Yonghong Ma & Xiaomeng Yang & Sen Qu & Lingkai Kong, 2022. "Research on the formation mechanism of big data technology cooperation networks: empirical evidence from China," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(3), pages 1273-1294, March.
    17. Epskamp, Sacha & Cramer, Angélique O.J. & Waldorp, Lourens J. & Schmittmann, Verena D. & Borsboom, Denny, 2012. "qgraph: Network Visualizations of Relationships in Psychometric Data," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 48(i04).
    18. Tanja Börzel, 2010. "European Governance: Negotiation and Competition in the Shadow of Hierarchy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(2), pages 191-219, March.
    19. Duxbury, Scott W, 2018. "Diagnosing Multicollinearity in Exponential Random Graph Models," SocArXiv 2tgm7, Center for Open Science.
    20. Luuk Middelaar, 2016. "The Return of Politics – The European Union after the crises in the eurozone and Ukraine," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(3), pages 495-507, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:reggov:v:17:y:2023:i:2:p:491-511. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1748-5991 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.