IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/statpp/v7y2016i1-2p29-54n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measurement Error and Attenuation Bias in Exponential Random Graph Models

Author

Listed:
  • Kim Yeaji

    (University of Houston – Political Science, Houston, TX, USA)

  • Antenangeli Leonardo

    (University of Houston – Political Science, Houston, TX, USA)

  • Kirkland Justin

    (University of Houston – Political Science, 3551 Cullen Boulevard Room 447, Houston, TX 77204, USA)

Abstract

Exponential Random Graph Models (ERGMs) are becoming increasingly popular tools for estimating the properties of social networks across the social sciences. While the asymptotic properties of ERGMs are well understood, much less is known about how ERGMs perform in the face of violations of the assumptions that drive those asymptotic properties. Given that empirical social networks rarely meet the strenuous assumptions of the ERGM perfectly, practical researchers are often in the position of knowing their coefficients are imperfect, but not knowing precisely how wrong those coefficients may be. In this research, we examine one violation of the asymptotic assumptions of ERGMs – perfectly measured social networks. Using several Monte Carlo simulations, we demonstrate that even randomly distributed measurement errors in networks under study can cause considerable attenuation in coefficients from ERGMs, and do real harm to subsequent hypothesis tests.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim Yeaji & Antenangeli Leonardo & Kirkland Justin, 2016. "Measurement Error and Attenuation Bias in Exponential Random Graph Models," Statistics, Politics and Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1-2), pages 29-54, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:statpp:v:7:y:2016:i:1-2:p:29-54:n:1
    DOI: 10.1515/spp-2016-0001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/spp-2016-0001
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/spp-2016-0001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M. & Christenson, Dino P. & Hitt, Matthew P., 2013. "Quality Over Quantity: Amici Influence and Judicial Decision Making," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 107(3), pages 446-460, August.
    2. Desmarais, Bruce A. & Harden, Jeffrey J. & Boehmke, Frederick J., 2015. "Persistent Policy Pathways: Inferring Diffusion Networks in the American States," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 109(2), pages 392-406, May.
    3. Cranmer, Skyler J. & Desmarais, Bruce A., 2011. "Inferential Network Analysis with Exponential Random Graph Models," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(1), pages 66-86, January.
    4. Hisashi Ohtsuki & Christoph Hauert & Erez Lieberman & Martin A. Nowak, 2006. "A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 441(7092), pages 502-505, May.
    5. Aronow, Peter M. & Samii, Cyrus & Assenova, Valentina A., 2015. "Cluster–Robust Variance Estimation for Dyadic Data," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(4), pages 564-577.
    6. Berry, William D. & Baybeck, Brady, 2005. "Using Geographic Information Systems to Study Interstate Competition," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 99(4), pages 505-519, November.
    7. Eduardo Alemán & Ernesto Calvo, 2013. "Explaining Policy Ties in Presidential Congresses: A Network Analysis of Bill Initiation Data," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 61(2), pages 356-377, June.
    8. Steven Goodreau & James Kitts & Martina Morris, 2009. "Birds of a feather, or friend of a friend? using exponential random graph models to investigate adolescent social networks," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 46(1), pages 103-125, February.
    9. Hoff P.D. & Raftery A.E. & Handcock M.S., 2002. "Latent Space Approaches to Social Network Analysis," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 97, pages 1090-1098, December.
    10. Erikson, Robert S. & Pinto, Pablo M. & Rader, Kelly T., 2014. "Dyadic Analysis in International Relations: A Cautionary Tale," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(4), pages 457-463.
    11. Handcock, Mark S. & Hunter, David R. & Butts, Carter T. & Goodreau, Steven M. & Morris, Martina, 2008. "statnet: Software Tools for the Representation, Visualization, Analysis and Simulation of Network Data," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 24(i01).
    12. Raymond J. Carroll & Kathryn Roeder & Larry Wasserman, 1999. "Flexible Parametric Measurement Error Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 55(1), pages 44-54, March.
    13. Poast, Paul, 2010. "(Mis)Using Dyadic Data to Analyze Multilateral Events," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(4), pages 403-425.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cornelius Fritz & Michael Lebacher & Göran Kauermann, 2020. "Tempus volat, hora fugit: A survey of tie‐oriented dynamic network models in discrete and continuous time," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 74(3), pages 275-299, August.
    2. Bryan S. Graham, 2019. "Network Data," Papers 1912.06346, arXiv.org.
    3. Lee, Jihui & Li, Gen & Wilson, James D., 2020. "Varying-coefficient models for dynamic networks," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    4. Richard A. Bettis & Constance E. Helfat & J. Myles Shaver & Anindya Ghosh & Ram Ranganathan & Lori Rosenkopf, 2016. "The impact of context and model choice on the determinants of strategic alliance formation: Evidence from a staged replication study," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(11), pages 2204-2221, November.
    5. Samrachana Adhikari & Beau Dabbs, 2018. "Social Network Analysis in R: A Software Review," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 43(2), pages 225-253, April.
    6. Duxbury, Scott W, 2019. "Mediation and Moderation in Statistical Network Models," SocArXiv 9bs4u, Center for Open Science.
    7. Angel Ortiz-Pelaez & Getaneh Ashenafi & Francois Roger & Agnes Waret-Szkuta, 2012. "Can Geographical Factors Determine the Choices of Farmers in the Ethiopian Highlands to Trade in Livestock Markets?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(2), pages 1-11, February.
    8. Côme Billard & Anna Creti & Antoine Mandel, 2020. "How Environmental Policies Spread? A Network Approach to Diffusion in the U.S," Working Papers 2020.12, FAERE - French Association of Environmental and Resource Economists.
    9. Reini Schrama, 2023. "Expert network interaction in the European Medicines Agency," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(2), pages 491-511, April.
    10. Leung, Michael P., 2019. "A weak law for moments of pairwise stable networks," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 210(2), pages 310-326.
    11. Reini Schrama & Dorte Sindbjerg Martinsen & Ellen Mastenbroek, 2020. "Going Nordic in European Administrative Networks?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 396-408.
    12. Zack W. Almquist & Benjamin E. Bagozzi, 2019. "Using Radical Environmentalist Texts to Uncover Network Structure and Network Features," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 48(4), pages 905-960, November.
    13. Max Gallop, 2017. "More dangerous than dyads: how a third party enables rationalist explanations for war," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 29(3), pages 353-381, July.
    14. Bruce A Desmarais & Skyler J Cranmer, 2012. "Statistical Inference for Valued-Edge Networks: The Generalized Exponential Random Graph Model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(1), pages 1-12, January.
    15. Ashish Arora & Michelle Gittelman & Sarah Kaplan & John Lynch & Will Mitchell & Nicolaj Siggelkow & Ji Youn (Rose) Kim & Michael Howard & Emily Cox Pahnke & Warren Boeker, 2016. "Understanding network formation in strategy research: Exponential random graph models," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1), pages 22-44, January.
    16. Durante, Daniele & Dunson, David B., 2014. "Bayesian dynamic financial networks with time-varying predictors," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 19-26.
    17. Fischer, Manuel, 2015. "Collaboration patterns, external shocks and uncertainty: Swiss nuclear energy politics before and after Fukushima," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 520-528.
    18. Jon Echevarria & Javier Gardeazabal, 2016. "Refugee gravitation," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 169(3), pages 269-292, December.
    19. Brian Y. An & Adam Butz & Min-Kyeong Cha & Joshua L. Mitchell, 2023. "Following neighbors or regional leaders? Unpacking the effect of geographic proximity in local climate policy diffusion," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 56(4), pages 825-868, December.
    20. Skyler J. Cranmer & Bruce A. Desmarais & Elizabeth J. Menninga, 2012. "Complex Dependencies in the Alliance Network," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 29(3), pages 279-313, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:statpp:v:7:y:2016:i:1-2:p:29-54:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.