IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/povpop/v10y2018i2p147-158.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Child Support and Income Inequality

Author

Listed:
  • Yoonsook Ha
  • Maria Cancian
  • Daniel R. Meyer

Abstract

Child support contributes to many custodial‐mother families’ income, yet there are persistent concerns that many noncustodial fathers have low‐wage, unstable jobs that limit their ability to pay child support. Thus, child support may exacerbate inequality—that is, it may transfer resources from a low‐income noncustodial father to a custodial‐mother family that is already better off. These arguments, however, are generally made without reference to couple‐level data. This study uses multiple sources of Wisconsin administrative data to construct measures of income, including earnings, public transfers, and tax liabilities and benefits, on matched pairs of custodial and noncustodial parents and provides evidence on the role of child support in equalizing income between them. Findings show that for divorced couples, fathers are substantially better off than custodial mothers in pre‐tax/transfer income. Taxes and transfers reduce fathers’ relative advantages, and child support equalizes incomes between fathers and mothers. For never‐married couples, fathers have a slight advantage in pre‐tax/transfer income. Fathers’ relative advantage disappears after taxes and transfers; mothers are likely to be better off when measured by post–child support income, even after adjusting for the costs of children. These findings provide contexts relevant to implementation of the new federal child support regulations, finalized in 2016. 对于许多由母亲抚养孩子的家庭而言,子女抚养费成为了这些家庭的重要收入组成部分,但一直以来的顾虑是,很多不具有抚养权的父亲由于工资低,工作不稳定等因素,导致他们难以支付子女抚养费。因此,子女抚养费问题,可能会因为不具有监护权且收入低的父亲将财力资源转移给经济状况良好的由母亲抚养孩子的家庭,从而加剧收入不平等现象。然而,这些论点通常都没有参考由父母双方共同抚养小孩的家庭的相关数据。本文通过对来源于威斯康星州的多种行政管理数据的分析,将夫妇中具有监护权和不具有监护权的各方收入分别划分为:工资、公共支出、税收负担以及福利,并提供了证据以证明儿童抚养费具有平衡双方收入的作用。调查结果显示,对于离婚夫妇而言,大体上父亲在税前/扣除公共性支出前的收入方面,远远好于具有监护权的母亲,但是税收和转移性支出却降低了父亲在这方面的相对优势,从而子女抚养费也使父亲和母亲之间的收入变得相等。对于未婚情侣而言,父亲在税前/扣除公共性支出前的收入方面略有优势,但扣除了税收和转移性支出后,父亲的这种相对优势也不复存在;如果以子女抚养费收入来对双方的经济情况进行衡量的话,即使扣除了抚养孩子的必要支出,母亲的经济状况也很可能好过父亲的经济状况。这些研究结果为有关2016年确定的联邦儿童抚养法规的落实情况提供了背景。 La manutención infantil contribuye a los ingresos de muchas familias de madres con custodia, sin embargo, todavía hay preocupaciones que muchos padres sin custodia tienen trabajos de pocos ingresos e inestables que limitan su habilidad de pagar la manutención infantil. Por esto, la manutención infantil puede exacerbar la desigualdad—que podría transferir recursos de un padre sin custodia de bajos ingresos a una madre con custodia que ya está mejor económicamente. Estos argumentos, sin embargo, se hacen generalmente sin referencia a datos a nivel de la pareja. Este estudio utiliza múltiples fuentes datos administrativos de Wisconsin para construir medidas de ingresos incluyendo las ganancias, transferencias públicas y efectos negativos de impuestos, en parejas selectas de progenitores sin custodia y con custodia y proporciona evidencia del rol de la manutención infantil para equilibrar los ingresos entre ellos. Los hallazgos muestran que, en las parejas de divorciados, los padres están sustancialmente mejor económicamente que las madres con custodia en sus ingresos de transferencia antes de impuestos. Los impuestos y las transferencias recuden las ventajas relativas de los padres y la manutención infantil equilibra los ingresos entre las madres y los padres. Para las parejas que nunca se casaron, los padres tienen una ligera ventaja en sus ingresos de antes de impuestos. La ventaja relativa de los padres desaparece después de impuestos y transferencias; las madres son más propensas a estar mejor económicamente cuando se miden los ingresos de después de la manutención infantil, incluso después de ajustar los costos para los hijos. Estos hallazgos proporcionan contextos relevantes a la implementación de nuevas regulaciones federales para la manutención infantil, finalizadas en 2016.

Suggested Citation

  • Yoonsook Ha & Maria Cancian & Daniel R. Meyer, 2018. "Child Support and Income Inequality," Poverty & Public Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(2), pages 147-158, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:povpop:v:10:y:2018:i:2:p:147-158
    DOI: 10.1002/pop4.215
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/pop4.215
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/pop4.215?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Laura Tach & Alicia Eads, 2015. "Trends in the Economic Consequences of Marital and Cohabitation Dissolution in the United States," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 52(2), pages 401-432, April.
    2. Daniel Feenberg & Elisabeth Coutts, 1993. "An introduction to the TAXSIM model," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 12(1), pages 189-194.
    3. D. R. Meyer, "undated". "Supporting children born outside of marriage: Do child support awards keep pace with changes in fathers' incomes?," Institute for Research on Poverty Discussion Papers 1026-93, University of Wisconsin Institute for Research on Poverty.
    4. Maria Cancian & Daniel R. Meyer & Emma Caspar, 2008. "Welfare and child support: Complements, not substitutes," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(2), pages 354-375.
    5. Maria Cancian & Daniel Meyer & Patricia Brown & Steven Cook, 2014. "Who Gets Custody Now? Dramatic Changes in Children’s Living Arrangements After Divorce," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 51(4), pages 1381-1396, August.
    6. Maria Cancian & Daniel R. Meyer & Eunhee Han, 2011. "Child Support: Responsible Fatherhood and the Quid Pro Quo," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 635(1), pages 140-162, May.
    7. Greg Duncan & Saul Hoffman, 1985. "A reconsideration of the economic consequences of marital dissolution," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 22(4), pages 485-497, November.
    8. Marilyn Sinkewicz & Irwin Garfinkel, 2009. "Unwed fathers’ ability to pay child support: New estimates accounting for multiple-partner fertility," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 46(2), pages 247-263, May.
    9. Lino, Mark & Kuczynski, Kevin & Rodriguez, Nestor & Schap, TusaRebecca, 2017. "Expenditures on Children by Families, 2015," CNPP Reports 327257, United States Department of Agriculture, Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion.
    10. Elizabeth Phillips & Irwin Garfinkel, 1993. "Income growth among nonresident fathers: evidence from Wisconsin," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 30(2), pages 227-241, May.
    11. Rich, Lauren M., 2001. "Regular and irregular earnings of unwed fathers: Implications for child support practices," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(4-5), pages 353-376.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lenna Nepomnyaschy & Margaret Thomas & Alex Haralampoudis & Huiying Jin, 2022. "Nonresident Fathers and the Economic Precarity of Their Children," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 702(1), pages 78-96, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria Cancian & Daniel R. Meyer & Deborah Reed, 2010. "Promising Antipoverty Strategies for Families," Poverty & Public Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(3), pages 151-169, August.
    2. Maria Cancian & Daniel R. Meyer & Eunhee Han, 2011. "Child Support: Responsible Fatherhood and the Quid Pro Quo," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 635(1), pages 140-162, May.
    3. Yoonsook Ha & Maria Cancian & Daniel R. Meyer, 2010. "Unchanging child support orders in the face of unstable earnings," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(4), pages 799-820.
    4. Trisha Chanda, 2023. "Economic Wellbeing and Labor Supply Patterns of Subsequently Divorcing Mothers in Wisconsin," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 821-835, December.
    5. D. R. Meyer, "undated". "Health insurance and child support," Institute for Research on Poverty Discussion Papers 1042-94, University of Wisconsin Institute for Research on Poverty.
    6. Gulgun Bayaz-Ozturk & Richard V. Burkhauser & Kenneth A. Couch & Richard Hauser, 2018. "The Effects of Union Dissolution on the Economic Resources of Men and Women: A Comparative Analysis of Germany and the United States, 1985–2013," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 680(1), pages 235-258, November.
    7. Céline Le Bourdais & Sung-Hee Jeon & Shelley Clark & Évelyne Lapierre-Adamcyk, 2016. "Impact of conjugal separation on women’s income in Canada: Does the type of union matter?," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 35(50), pages 1489-1522.
    8. Bram Hogendoorn, 2022. "Why do Socioeconomic Differences in Women’s Living Standards Converge After Union Dissolution?," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 38(3), pages 577-622, August.
    9. Laura Tach & Alicia Eads, 2015. "Trends in the Economic Consequences of Marital and Cohabitation Dissolution in the United States," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 52(2), pages 401-432, April.
    10. Waring, Melody K. & Meyer, Daniel R., 2020. "Welfare, work, and single mothers: The Great Recession and income packaging strategies," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    11. Julia Mink, 2021. "The effects of major life events and exposure to adverse environmental conditions on health and health-related outcomes [Les effets d'événements majeurs de la vie et de l'exposition à des condition," SciencePo Working papers Main tel-03575191, HAL.
    12. Maria Cancian & Yiyoon Chung & Daniel R. Meyer, 2016. "Fathers’ Imprisonment and Mothers’ Multiple-Partner Fertility," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 53(6), pages 2045-2074, December.
    13. Carole Bonnet & Bertrand Garbinti & Anne Solaz, 2021. "The flip side of marital specialization: the gendered effect of divorce on living standards and labor supply," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 34(2), pages 515-573, April.
    14. repec:mpr:mprres:6557 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Vogel, Lisa Klein, 2020. "Help me help you: Identifying and addressing barriers to child support compliance," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    16. Richard Hauser & Richard V. Burkhauser & Kenneth A. Couch & Gulgun Bayaz-Ozturk, 2016. "Wife or Frau, Women Still Do Worse: A Comparison of Men and Women in the United States and Germany after Union Dissolutions in the 1990s and 2000s," Working papers 2016-39, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics.
    17. Allison Dwyer Emory & Daniel P. Miller & Lenna Nepomnyaschy & Maureen R. Waller & Alexandra Haralampoudis, 2020. "The Minimum Wage and Fathers’ Residence with Children," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 472-491, September.
    18. Julia Mink, 2021. "The effects of major life events and exposure to adverse environmental conditions on health and health-related outcomes [Les effets d'événements majeurs de la vie et de l'exposition à des condition," SciencePo Working papers tel-03575191, HAL.
    19. Maria Cancian & Daniel R. Meyer & Robert G. Wood, 2022. "Do Carrots Work Better than Sticks? Results from the National Child Support Noncustodial Parent Employment Demonstration," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(2), pages 552-578, March.
    20. Elira Kuka, 2020. "Quantifying the Benefits of Social Insurance: Unemployment Insurance and Health," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 102(3), pages 490-505, July.
    21. Colas, Mark & Saulnier, Emmett, 2023. "Vertical migration externalities," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:povpop:v:10:y:2018:i:2:p:147-158. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1944-2858 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.