IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/nuhsci/v20y2018i1p4-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Toward a comprehensive, theoretical model of compassion fatigue: An integrative literature review

Author

Listed:
  • Siedine K. Coetzee
  • Heather K.S. Laschinger

Abstract

This study was an integrative literature review in relation to compassion fatigue models, appraising these models, and developing a comprehensive theoretical model of compassion fatigue. A systematic search on PubMed, EbscoHost (Academic Search Premier, E‐Journals, Medline, PsycINFO, Health Source Nursing/Academic Edition, CINAHL, MasterFILE Premier and Health Source Consumer Edition), gray literature, and manual searches of included reference lists was conducted in 2016. The studies (n = 11) were analyzed, and the strengths and limitations of the compassion fatigue models identified. We further built on these models through the application of the conservation of resources theory and the social neuroscience of empathy. The compassion fatigue model shows that it is not empathy that puts nurses at risk of developing compassion fatigue, but rather a lack of resources, inadequate positive feedback, and the nurse’s response to personal distress. By acting on these three aspects, the risk of developing compassion fatigue can be addressed, which could improve the retention of a compassionate and committed nurse workforce.

Suggested Citation

  • Siedine K. Coetzee & Heather K.S. Laschinger, 2018. "Toward a comprehensive, theoretical model of compassion fatigue: An integrative literature review," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(1), pages 4-15, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:nuhsci:v:20:y:2018:i:1:p:4-15
    DOI: 10.1111/nhs.12387
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12387
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/nhs.12387?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht & Jean Decety, 2013. "Empathy in Clinical Practice: How Individual Dispositions, Gender, and Experience Moderate Empathic Concern, Burnout, and Emotional Distress in Physicians," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-12, April.
    2. Kelsey B Morrison & Susan A Korol, 2014. "Nurses' perceived and actual caregiving roles: identifying factors that can contribute to job satisfaction," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(23-24), pages 3468-3477, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katherine A. DeCelles & Michel Anteby, 2020. "Compassion in the Clink: When and How Human Services Workers Overcome Barriers to Care," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(6), pages 1408-1431, November.
    2. Alberto Dionigi & Giulia Casu & Paola Gremigni, 2020. "Associations of Self-Efficacy, Optimism, and Empathy with Psychological Health in Healthcare Volunteers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-13, August.
    3. Yung Kai Lin & Der-Yuan Chen & Blossom Yen-Ju Lin, 2017. "Determinants and effects of medical students’ core self-evaluation tendencies on clinical competence and workplace well-being in clerkship," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-12, November.
    4. Jasenka Vujanić & Nada Prlić & Robert Lovrić, 2020. "Nurses’ Self-Assessment of Caring Behaviors in Nurse–Patient Interactions: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-15, July.
    5. Jaana Seitovirta & Katri Vehviläinen‐Julkunen & Lasse Mitronen & Sara De Gieter & Tarja Kvist, 2017. "Attention to nurses’ rewarding – an interview study of registered nurses working in primary and private healthcare in Finland," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(7-8), pages 1042-1052, April.
    6. Daniel Román-Sánchez & Juan Carlos Paramio-Cuevas & Olga Paloma-Castro & José Luis Palazón-Fernández & Isabel Lepiani-Díaz & José Manuel de la Fuente Rodríguez & María Reyes López-Millán, 2022. "Empathy, Burnout, and Attitudes towards Mental Illness among Spanish Mental Health Nurses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-13, January.
    7. Ye-Seul Lee & Hyun-Seo Song & Hackjin Kim & Younbyoung Chae, 2019. "Altruistic decisions are influenced by the allocation of monetary incentives in a pain-sharing game," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-16, March.
    8. Hina Fayyaz & Ajmal Waheed, 2023. "Organization-Set High-Performance Goals and Employee Expediency Syndrome: An Underlying Mechanism of Supervisor Expediency and Illegitimate Tasks," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, April.
    9. Giovanna Vicarelli, 2016. "Stress, burnout e insoddisfazione dei medici: un campo di indagine aperto," PRISMA Economia - Societ? - Lavoro, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(1), pages 9-20.
    10. Bettina Lampert & Christine Unterrainer & Christian Thomas Seubert, 2019. "Exhausted through client interaction—Detached concern profiles as an emotional resource over time?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-20, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:nuhsci:v:20:y:2018:i:1:p:4-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1442-2018 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.