IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v23y2014i23-24p3468-3477.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nurses' perceived and actual caregiving roles: identifying factors that can contribute to job satisfaction

Author

Listed:
  • Kelsey B Morrison
  • Susan A Korol

Abstract

Aims and objectives To compare nurses' caring expectations with their caregiving experiences and to identify factors that could potentially be included in a preliminary conceptual model of job satisfaction and compassion fatigue. Background Nurses often report emotional reward and satisfaction in their profession from compassionately caring for sick and injured patients. However, being in close proximity to trauma can eventually deplete a nurse's compassion and empathy for the patients they care for. This loss of compassion is further exacerbated by demanding work environments that involve administrative duties, attending to patients' psychosocial needs and interacting with patients' families. To date, the literature has tended to focus on pathology of compassion fatigue, rather than identifying its contributing factors. Design A grounded theory approach was used to identify emerging themes in nurses' accounts of their caregiving roles. Methods Open‐ended interviews were conducted with nurses (n = 9) who were employed by a maritime district health authority for a minimum of five years. Interviews focused on beliefs of how to provide care, perceived caregiving responsibilities and perceived challenges in the provision of care. Results Emerging from the data is a proposed model of job satisfaction. The concepts of monitoring and patient advocacy appeared to be key components in reported satisfaction or alienation. Discrepancies were found between care expectations outlined by management and nurses' perceptions of care provision. Additionally, type of nursing education was related to nurses' confidence in applying nursing skills. Conclusions These findings have implications for training programmes, hospital management and quality of patient care. Relevance to clinical practice It is important to identify factors that could explain resilience to compassion fatigue because compassion fatigue has negative consequences not only for nurses themselves but for the patients in their care.

Suggested Citation

  • Kelsey B Morrison & Susan A Korol, 2014. "Nurses' perceived and actual caregiving roles: identifying factors that can contribute to job satisfaction," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(23-24), pages 3468-3477, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:23-24:p:3468-3477
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12597
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12597
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12597?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Siedine K. Coetzee & Heather K.S. Laschinger, 2018. "Toward a comprehensive, theoretical model of compassion fatigue: An integrative literature review," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(1), pages 4-15, March.
    2. Jaana Seitovirta & Katri Vehviläinen‐Julkunen & Lasse Mitronen & Sara De Gieter & Tarja Kvist, 2017. "Attention to nurses’ rewarding – an interview study of registered nurses working in primary and private healthcare in Finland," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(7-8), pages 1042-1052, April.
    3. Hina Fayyaz & Ajmal Waheed, 2023. "Organization-Set High-Performance Goals and Employee Expediency Syndrome: An Underlying Mechanism of Supervisor Expediency and Illegitimate Tasks," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, April.
    4. Jasenka Vujanić & Nada Prlić & Robert Lovrić, 2020. "Nurses’ Self-Assessment of Caring Behaviors in Nurse–Patient Interactions: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-15, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:23-24:p:3468-3477. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.