IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v56y2009i7p593-599.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Two‐machine flow shop scheduling with common due window to minimize weighted number of early and tardy jobs

Author

Listed:
  • Wing‐Kwan Yeung
  • Ceyda Oğuz
  • Tai‐Chiu Edwin Cheng

Abstract

This article studies two due window scheduling problems to minimize the weighted number of early and tardy jobs in a two‐machine flow shop, where the window size is externally determined. These new scheduling models have many practical applications in real life. However, results on these problems have rarely appeared in the literature because of a lack of structural and optimality properties for solving them. In this article, we derive several dominance properties and theorems, including elimination rules and sequencing rules based on Johnsos order, lower bounds on the penalty, and upper bounds on the window location, which help to significantly trim the search space for the problems. We further show that the problems are NP‐hard in the ordinary sense only. We finally develop efficient pseudopolynomial dynamic programming algorithms for solving the problems. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics, 2009

Suggested Citation

  • Wing‐Kwan Yeung & Ceyda Oğuz & Tai‐Chiu Edwin Cheng, 2009. "Two‐machine flow shop scheduling with common due window to minimize weighted number of early and tardy jobs," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(7), pages 593-599, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:56:y:2009:i:7:p:593-599
    DOI: 10.1002/nav.20356
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.20356
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/nav.20356?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. W.K. Yeung & Ceyda Oğuz & T.C. Cheng, 2001. "Minimizing Weighted Number of Early and Tardy Jobs with a Common Due Window Involving Location Penalty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 108(1), pages 33-54, November.
    2. E. L. Lawler & J. M. Moore, 1969. "A Functional Equation and its Application to Resource Allocation and Sequencing Problems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 77-84, September.
    3. Gordon, Valery & Proth, Jean-Marie & Chu, Chengbin, 2002. "A survey of the state-of-the-art of common due date assignment and scheduling research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(1), pages 1-25, May.
    4. Michael X. Weng & Jose A. Ventura, 1994. "Scheduling about a large common due date with tolerance to minimize mean absolute deviation of completion times," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(6), pages 843-851, October.
    5. Koulamas, Christos, 1996. "Single-machine scheduling with time windows and earliness/tardiness penalties," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 190-202, May.
    6. Della Croce, Federico & Gupta, Jatinder N. D. & Tadei, Roberto, 2000. "Minimizing tardy jobs in a flowshop with common due date," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(2), pages 375-381, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vincent T’kindt & Federico Della Croce & Jean-Louis Bouquard, 2007. "Enumeration of Pareto Optima for a Flowshop Scheduling Problem with Two Criteria," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 64-72, February.
    2. Janiak, Adam & Janiak, Władysław A. & Krysiak, Tomasz & Kwiatkowski, Tomasz, 2015. "A survey on scheduling problems with due windows," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(2), pages 347-357.
    3. Yeung, W. K. & Oguz, Ceyda & Edwin Cheng, T. C., 2004. "Two-stage flowshop earliness and tardiness machine scheduling involving a common due window," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(3), pages 421-434, August.
    4. Huynh Tuong, Nguyen & Soukhal, Ameur & Billaut, Jean-Charles, 2010. "A new dynamic programming formulation for scheduling independent tasks with common due date on parallel machines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(3), pages 646-653, May.
    5. Koulamas, Christos & Kyparisis, George J., 2023. "A classification of dynamic programming formulations for offline deterministic single-machine scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(3), pages 999-1017.
    6. Shabtay, Dvir & Steiner, George & Zhang, Rui, 2016. "Optimal coordination of resource allocation, due date assignment and scheduling decisions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 41-54.
    7. Gur Mosheiov & Daniel Oron, 2004. "Due‐window assignment with unit processing‐time jobs," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 51(7), pages 1005-1017, October.
    8. Chen, Ke & Cheng, T.C.E. & Huang, Hailiang & Ji, Min & Yao, Danli, 2023. "Single-machine scheduling with autonomous and induced learning to minimize total weighted number of tardy jobs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(1), pages 24-34.
    9. Yin, Yunqiang & Cheng, T.C.E. & Hsu, Chou-Jung & Wu, Chin-Chia, 2013. "Single-machine batch delivery scheduling with an assignable common due window," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 216-225.
    10. Lei Pan & Xinyu Sun & Ji-Bo Wang & Li-Han Zhang & Dan-Yang Lv, 2023. "Due date assignment single-machine scheduling with delivery times, position-dependent weights and deteriorating jobs," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 1-16, May.
    11. Willem E. de Paepe & Jan Karel Lenstra & Jiri Sgall & René A. Sitters & Leen Stougie, 2004. "Computer-Aided Complexity Classification of Dial-a-Ride Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 16(2), pages 120-132, May.
    12. Slotnick, Susan A., 2011. "Order acceptance and scheduling: A taxonomy and review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 212(1), pages 1-11, July.
    13. Rubing Chen & Jinjiang Yuan, 2020. "Single-machine scheduling of proportional-linearly deteriorating jobs with positional due indices," 4OR, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 177-196, June.
    14. Chuang Wang & Pingyu Jiang, 2019. "Deep neural networks based order completion time prediction by using real-time job shop RFID data," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 1303-1318, March.
    15. Reha Uzsoy & Chung‐Yee Lee & Louis A. Martin‐Vega, 1992. "Scheduling semiconductor test operations: Minimizing maximum lateness and number of tardy jobs on a single machine," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(3), pages 369-388, April.
    16. Zhi-Long Chen & Nicholas G. Hall, 2010. "The Coordination of Pricing and Scheduling Decisions," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 12(1), pages 77-92, April.
    17. Altendorfer, Klaus & Minner, Stefan, 2015. "Influence of order acceptance policies on optimal capacity investment with stochastic customer required lead times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(2), pages 555-565.
    18. Lemos, R.F. & Ronconi, D.P., 2015. "Heuristics for the stochastic single-machine problem with E/T costs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 131-142.
    19. Imed Kacem & Hans Kellerer & Yann Lanuel, 2015. "Approximation algorithms for maximizing the weighted number of early jobs on a single machine with non-availability intervals," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 403-412, October.
    20. Shi Chen & Hau Lee, 2017. "Incentive Alignment and Coordination of Project Supply Chains," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(4), pages 1011-1025, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:56:y:2009:i:7:p:593-599. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.