IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v54y2007i5p544-555.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The importance of decoupling recurrent and disruption risks in a supply chain

Author

Listed:
  • Sunil Chopra
  • Gilles Reinhardt
  • Usha Mohan

Abstract

This paper focuses on the importance of decoupling recurrent supply risk and disruption risk when planning appropriate mitigation strategies. We show that bundling the two uncertainties leads a manager to underutilize a reliable source while over utilizing a cheaper but less reliable supplier. As in Dada et al. (working paper, University of Illinois, Champaign, IL, 2003), we show that increasing quantity from a cheaper but less reliable source is an effective risk mitigation strategy if most of the supply risk growth comes from an increase in recurrent uncertainty. In contrast, we show that a firm should order more from a reliable source and less from a cheaper but less reliable source if most of the supply risk growth comes from an increase in disruption probability. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics, 2007

Suggested Citation

  • Sunil Chopra & Gilles Reinhardt & Usha Mohan, 2007. "The importance of decoupling recurrent and disruption risks in a supply chain," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(5), pages 544-555, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:54:y:2007:i:5:p:544-555
    DOI: 10.1002/nav.20228
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.20228
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/nav.20228?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Haresh Gurnani & Mengze Shi, 2006. "A Bargaining Model for a First-Time Interaction Under Asymmetric Beliefs of Supply Reliability," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(6), pages 865-880, June.
    2. Qi, Xiangtong & Bard, Jonathan F. & Yu, Gang, 2004. "Supply chain coordination with demand disruptions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 301-312, August.
    3. Weiss, Howard J. & Rosenthal, Edward C., 1992. "Optimal ordering policies when anticipating a disruption in supply or demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(3), pages 370-382, June.
    4. Dada, Maqbool & Petruzzi, Nicholas C. & Schwarz, Leroy B., 2003. "A Newsvendor Model with Unreliable Suppliers," Working Papers 03-0112, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    5. Ranga V. Ramasesh & J. Keith Ord & Jack C. Hayya & Andrew Pan, 1991. "Sole Versus Dual Sourcing in Stochastic Lead-Time (s, Q) Inventory Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(4), pages 428-443, April.
    6. Kamran Moinzadeh & Steven Nahmias, 1988. "A Continuous Review Model for an Inventory System with Two Supply Modes," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(6), pages 761-773, June.
    7. Parlar, Mahmut & Perry, David, 1995. "Analysis of a (Q, r, T) inventory policy with deterministic and random yields when future supply is uncertain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 84(2), pages 431-443, July.
    8. Parlar, Mahmut, 1997. "Continuous-review inventory problem with random supply interruptions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(2), pages 366-385, June.
    9. Yigal Gerchak & Mahmut Parlar, 1990. "Yield randomness, cost tradeoffs, and diversification in the EOQ model," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(3), pages 341-354, June.
    10. Parlar, Mahmut & Wang, Dan, 1993. "Diversification under yield randomness in inventory models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 52-64, April.
    11. Ravi Anupindi & Ram Akella, 1993. "Diversification Under Supply Uncertainty," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(8), pages 944-963, August.
    12. Brian Tomlin, 2006. "On the Value of Mitigation and Contingency Strategies for Managing Supply Chain Disruption Risks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(5), pages 639-657, May.
    13. Candace Arai Yano & Hau L. Lee, 1995. "Lot Sizing with Random Yields: A Review," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 43(2), pages 311-334, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brian Tomlin, 2006. "On the Value of Mitigation and Contingency Strategies for Managing Supply Chain Disruption Risks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(5), pages 639-657, May.
    2. Süleyman Demirel & Roman Kapuscinski & Man Yu, 2018. "Strategic Behavior of Suppliers in the Face of Production Disruptions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(2), pages 533-551, February.
    3. Ahiska, S. Sebnem & Appaji, Samyuktha R. & King, Russell E. & Warsing, Donald P., 2013. "A Markov decision process-based policy characterization approach for a stochastic inventory control problem with unreliable sourcing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(2), pages 485-496.
    4. Narendra Agrawal & Steven Nahmias, 1997. "Rationalization Of The Supplier Base In The Presence Of Yield Uncertainty," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 6(3), pages 291-308, September.
    5. Seung Hwan Jung, 2020. "Offshore versus Onshore Sourcing: Quick Response, Random Yield, and Competition," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(3), pages 750-766, March.
    6. Awi Federgruen & Nan Yang, 2008. "Selecting a Portfolio of Suppliers Under Demand and Supply Risks," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(4), pages 916-936, August.
    7. Sevgen, Arya & Sargut, F. Zeynep, 2019. "May reorder point help under disruptions?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 61-69.
    8. Bin Zhang & Zekai Lai & Qiangqiang Wang, 2021. "Multi-product dual sourcing problem with limited capacities," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 2055-2075, September.
    9. Gel, Esma S. & Salman, F. Sibel, 2022. "Dynamic ordering decisions with approximate learning of supply yield uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    10. Svoboda, Josef & Minner, Stefan & Yao, Man, 2021. "Typology and literature review on multiple supplier inventory control models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(1), pages 1-23.
    11. Martinez de Albeniz, Victor, 2007. "Pricing in a duopoly with a lead time advantage," IESE Research Papers D/720, IESE Business School.
    12. Asli Sencer Erdem & Mehmet Murat Fadilog̃lu & Süleyman Özekici, 2006. "An EOQ model with multiple suppliers and random capacity," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(1), pages 101-114, February.
    13. Saeed Poormoaied & Ece Zeliha Demirci, 2021. "Analysis of an inventory system with emergency ordering option at the time of supply disruption," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 43(4), pages 1007-1045, December.
    14. Qi Feng & Justin Jia & J. George Shanthikumar, 2019. "Dynamic Multisourcing with Dependent Supplies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 2770-2786, June.
    15. Lian Qi & Zuo‐Jun Max Shen, 2007. "A supply chain design model with unreliable supply," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(8), pages 829-844, December.
    16. Kamran Moinzadeh & Steven Nahmias, 2000. "Adjustment Strategies for a Fixed Delivery Contract," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 48(3), pages 408-423, June.
    17. Hishamuddin, Hawa & Sarker, Ruhul A. & Essam, Daryl, 2014. "A recovery mechanism for a two echelon supply chain system under supply disruption," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 555-563.
    18. Sammi Yu Tang & Panos Kouvelis, 2011. "Supplier Diversification Strategies in the Presence of Yield Uncertainty and Buyer Competition," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 13(4), pages 439-451, October.
    19. Hishamuddin, H. & Sarker, R.A. & Essam, D., 2012. "A disruption recovery model for a single stage production-inventory system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 222(3), pages 464-473.
    20. Schmitt, Amanda J. & Snyder, Lawrence V. & Shen, Zuo-Jun Max, 2010. "Inventory systems with stochastic demand and supply: Properties and approximations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(2), pages 313-328, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:54:y:2007:i:5:p:544-555. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.