IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v206y2010i2p313-328.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inventory systems with stochastic demand and supply: Properties and approximations

Author

Listed:
  • Schmitt, Amanda J.
  • Snyder, Lawrence V.
  • Shen, Zuo-Jun Max

Abstract

We model a retailer whose supplier is subject to complete supply disruptions. We combine discrete-event uncertainty (disruptions) and continuous sources of uncertainty (stochastic demand or supply yield), which have different impacts on optimal inventory settings. This prevents optimal solutions from being found in closed form. We develop a closed-form approximate solution by focusing on a single stochastic period of demand or yield. We show how the familiar newsboy fractile is a critical trade-off in these systems, since the optimal base-stock policies balance inventory holding costs with the risk of shortage costs generated by a disruption.

Suggested Citation

  • Schmitt, Amanda J. & Snyder, Lawrence V. & Shen, Zuo-Jun Max, 2010. "Inventory systems with stochastic demand and supply: Properties and approximations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(2), pages 313-328, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:206:y:2010:i:2:p:313-328
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(10)00160-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Golany, Boaz & Kaplan, Edward H. & Marmur, Abraham & Rothblum, Uriel G., 2009. "Nature plays with dice - terrorists do not: Allocating resources to counter strategic versus probabilistic risks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(1), pages 198-208, January.
    2. Wagner, Stephan M. & Bode, Christoph & Koziol, Philipp, 2009. "Supplier default dependencies: Empirical evidence from the automotive industry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(1), pages 150-161, November.
    3. Jing-Sheng Song & Paul H. Zipkin, 1996. "Inventory Control with Information About Supply Conditions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(10), pages 1409-1419, October.
    4. Parlar, Mahmut & Perry, David, 1995. "Analysis of a (Q, r, T) inventory policy with deterministic and random yields when future supply is uncertain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 84(2), pages 431-443, July.
    5. Zhibin (Ben) Yang & Göker Ayd{i}n & Volodymyr Babich & Damian R. Beil, 2009. "Supply Disruptions, Asymmetric Information, and a Backup Production Option," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(2), pages 192-209, February.
    6. Parlar, Mahmut, 1997. "Continuous-review inventory problem with random supply interruptions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(2), pages 366-385, June.
    7. Volodymyr Babich & Apostolos N. Burnetas & Peter H. Ritchken, 2007. "Competition and Diversification Effects in Supply Chains with Supplier Default Risk," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 9(2), pages 123-146, October.
    8. Brian Tomlin, 2006. "On the Value of Mitigation and Contingency Strategies for Managing Supply Chain Disruption Risks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(5), pages 639-657, May.
    9. Candace Arai Yano & Hau L. Lee, 1995. "Lot Sizing with Random Yields: A Review," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 43(2), pages 311-334, April.
    10. Maqbool Dada & Nicholas C. Petruzzi & Leroy B. Schwarz, 2007. "A Newsvendor's Procurement Problem when Suppliers Are Unreliable," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 9(1), pages 9-32, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Süleyman Demirel & Roman Kapuscinski & Man Yu, 2018. "Strategic Behavior of Suppliers in the Face of Production Disruptions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(2), pages 533-551, February.
    2. Taleizadeh, Ata Allah & Tafakkori, Keivan & Thaichon, Park, 2021. "Resilience toward supply disruptions: A stochastic inventory control model with partial backordering under the base stock policy," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    3. Erjie Ang & Dan A. Iancu & Robert Swinney, 2017. "Disruption Risk and Optimal Sourcing in Multitier Supply Networks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(8), pages 2397-2419, August.
    4. Gupta, Varun & Ivanov, Dmitry & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2021. "Competitive pricing of substitute products under supply disruption," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    5. Bo He & He Huang & Kaifu Yuan, 2016. "Managing supply disruption through procurement strategy and price competition," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(7), pages 1980-1999, April.
    6. Fang, Yaner & Shou, Biying, 2015. "Managing supply uncertainty under supply chain Cournot competition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(1), pages 156-176.
    7. Chen, Junlin & Zhao, Xiaobo & Zhou, Yun, 2012. "A periodic-review inventory system with a capacitated backup supplier for mitigating supply disruptions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(2), pages 312-323.
    8. Basu, Preetam & Avittathur, Balram, 2018. "Pricing and sourcing strategies for competing retailers in supply chains under disruption riskAuthor-Name: Kumar, Milan," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(2), pages 533-543.
    9. Gregory A. DeCroix, 2013. "Inventory Management for an Assembly System Subject to Supply Disruptions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(9), pages 2079-2092, September.
    10. Brian Tomlin, 2009. "Impact of Supply Learning When Suppliers Are Unreliable," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(2), pages 192-209, August.
    11. Qi Feng & J. George Shanthikumar, 2018. "Supply and Demand Functions in Inventory Models," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 66(1), pages 77-91, 1-2.
    12. Hagspiel, Simeon, 2016. "Supply Chain Reliability and the Role of Individual Suppliers," EWI Working Papers 2016-5, Energiewirtschaftliches Institut an der Universitaet zu Koeln (EWI).
    13. Huang, He & Xu, Hongyan, 2015. "Dual sourcing and backup production: Coexistence versus exclusivity," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 57(PA), pages 22-33.
    14. Wang, Yimin & Xiao, Yixuan & Yang, Nan, 2014. "Improving reliability of a shared supplier with competition and spillovers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(2), pages 499-510.
    15. Seung Hwan Jung, 2020. "Offshore versus Onshore Sourcing: Quick Response, Random Yield, and Competition," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(3), pages 750-766, March.
    16. Zhao, Lima & Huchzermeier, Arnd, 2015. "Operations–finance interface models: A literature review and framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(3), pages 905-917.
    17. Schmitt, Amanda J. & Sun, Siyuan Anthony & Snyder, Lawrence V. & Shen, Zuo-Jun Max, 2015. "Centralization versus decentralization: Risk pooling, risk diversification, and supply chain disruptions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 201-212.
    18. Volodymyr Babich, 2010. "Independence of Capacity Ordering and Financial Subsidies to Risky Suppliers," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 12(4), pages 583-607, September.
    19. Alptekinoğlu, Aydın & Bhandari, Ashish S. & Sapra, Amar, 2024. "Demand management using responsive pricing and product variety to counter supply chain disruptions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(3), pages 867-881.
    20. Luo, Sha & Ahiska, S. Sebnem & Fang, Shu-Cherng & King, Russell E. & Warsing, Donald P. & Wu, Shuohao, 2021. "An analysis of optimal ordering policies for a two-supplier system with disruption risk," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:206:y:2010:i:2:p:313-328. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.