IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v43y1996i1p1-21.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ripples, complements, and substitutes in generalized networks

Author

Listed:
  • Antoine Gautier
  • Frieda Granot

Abstract

We extend the qualitative theory of sensitivity analysis for minimum‐cost pure network flows of Granot and Veinott [17] to generalized network flow problems, that is, network flow problems where the amount of flow picked up by an arc is multiplied by a (positive) gain while traversing the arc. Three main results are presented. The ripple theorem gives upper bounds on the absolute value of optimal‐flow variations as a function of variations in the problem parameter(s). The theory of substitutes and complements provides necessary and sufficient conditions for optimal‐flow changes to consistently have the same (or the opposite) sign(s) in two given arcs, whereas the monotonicity theorem links changes in the value of the parameters to changes in optimal arc flows. Bounds on the rates of changes are also discussed. Compared with pure networks, the presence of gains makes qualitative sensitivity analysis here a much harder task. We show the profound effect on computational issues caused by the departure from the pure network structure. © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Suggested Citation

  • Antoine Gautier & Frieda Granot, 1996. "Ripples, complements, and substitutes in generalized networks," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(1), pages 1-21, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:43:y:1996:i:1:p:1-21
    DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6750(199602)43:13.0.CO;2-F
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6750(199602)43:13.0.CO;2-F
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6750(199602)43:13.0.CO;2-F?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joyce Elam & Fred Glover & Darwin Klingman, 1979. "A Strongly Convergent Primal Simplex Algorithm for Generalized Networks," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 4(1), pages 39-59, February.
    2. Michael Florian & Sang Nguyen, 1976. "An Application and Validation of Equilibrium Trip Assignment Methods," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(4), pages 374-390, November.
    3. Richard E. Rosenthal, 1981. "A Nonlinear Network Flow Algorithm for Maximization of Benefits in a Hydroelectric Power System," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(4), pages 763-786, August.
    4. M. Collins & L. Cooper & R. Helgason & J. Kennington & L. LeBlanc, 1978. "Solving the Pipe Network Analysis Problem Using Optimization Techniques," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(7), pages 747-760, March.
    5. Frieda Granot & Arthur F. Veinott, 1985. "Substitutes, Complements and Ripples in Network Flows," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 471-497, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gautier, Antoine & Granot, Frieda & Levi, Maurice, 2002. "Alternative foreign exchange management protocols: an application of sensitivity analysis," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lars Schewe & Martin Schmidt & Johannes Thürauf, 2020. "Computing technical capacities in the European entry-exit gas market is NP-hard," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 295(1), pages 337-362, December.
    2. Mirman, Leonard J. & Morand, Olivier F. & Reffett, Kevin L., 2008. "A qualitative approach to Markovian equilibrium in infinite horizon economies with capital," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 139(1), pages 75-98, March.
    3. Brkic, Dejan, 2009. "An improvement of Hardy Cross method applied on looped spatial natural gas distribution networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(7-8), pages 1290-1300, July.
    4. Hong, Sung-Pil & Kim, Taegyoon & Lee, Subin, 2019. "A precision pump schedule optimization for the water supply networks with small buffers," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 24-37.
    5. J. David Allen & Richard V. Helgason & Jeffery L. Kennington, 1987. "The frequency assignment problem: A solution via nonlinear programming," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(1), pages 133-139, February.
    6. Ozan Candogan & Markos Epitropou & Rakesh V. Vohra, 2021. "Competitive Equilibrium and Trading Networks: A Network Flow Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 69(1), pages 114-147, January.
    7. Fränk Plein & Johannes Thürauf & Martine Labbé & Martin Schmidt, 2022. "A bilevel optimization approach to decide the feasibility of bookings in the European gas market," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 95(3), pages 409-449, June.
    8. Lina Mallozzi & Roberta Messalli, 2017. "Multi-Leader Multi-Follower Model with Aggregative Uncertainty," Games, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-14, June.
    9. Queyranne, M. & Tardella, F., 2015. "Carathéodory, Helly and Radon Numbers for Sublattice Convexities," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2015010, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    10. Rusmevichientong, Paat & Van Roy, Benjamin, 2003. "Decentralized decision-making in a large team with local information," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 266-295, May.
    11. Rujeerapaiboon, Napat & Zhong, Yuanguang & Zhu, Dan, 2023. "Resilience of long chain under disruption," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(2), pages 597-615.
    12. David Simchi-Levi & Yehua Wei, 2012. "Understanding the Performance of the Long Chain and Sparse Designs in Process Flexibility," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(5), pages 1125-1141, October.
    13. Frederic H. Murphy & Zhong Xian Wang, 1993. "A network reformulation of an electric utility expansion planning model," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(4), pages 451-457, June.
    14. Amir, Rabah & De Castro, Luciano, 2017. "Nash equilibrium in games with quasi-monotonic best-responses," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 220-246.
    15. D E Boyce, 1984. "Urban Transportation Network-Equilibrium and Design Models: Recent Achievements and Future Prospects," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 16(11), pages 1445-1474, November.
    16. David R. Morrison & Jason J. Sauppe & Sheldon H. Jacobson, 2013. "A Network Simplex Algorithm for the Equal Flow Problem on a Generalized Network," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 2-12, February.
    17. Lars Schewe & Martin Schmidt & Johannes Thürauf, 2022. "Global optimization for the multilevel European gas market system with nonlinear flow models on trees," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 82(3), pages 627-653, March.
    18. Jaume Barceló, 1997. "A survey of some mathematical programming models in transportation," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 5(1), pages 1-40, June.
    19. Ralf Lenz & Kai Helge Becker, 2022. "Optimization of capacity expansion in potential-driven networks including multiple looping: a comparison of modelling approaches," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 44(1), pages 179-224, March.
    20. Xin Chen & Daniel Zhuoyu Long & Jin Qi, 2021. "Preservation of Supermodularity in Parametric Optimization: Necessary and Sufficient Conditions on Constraint Structures," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 69(1), pages 1-12, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:43:y:1996:i:1:p:1-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.