IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v41y1994i6p707-718.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Monitoring declining quality of ammunition stockpile under step stress

Author

Listed:
  • So Young Sohn

Abstract

Most ammunition is produced long before its ultimate consumption and stored in a series of different depots for a considerably long period of time. During storage, the quality of the ammunition stockpile deteriorates proportionally to the condition of the depots. We view different conditions associated with a series of depots as step stress. A random effects logistic regression model is employed to predict the quality of ammunition stockpile in terms of the routing information such as a series of locations and duration of storage of ammunition lots. The resultant prediction model can be used to determine the appropriate time for reorder or renovation of ammunition before the quality becomes substandard. An example is given to illustrate the implementation procedure of the prediction model suggested in this article. © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Suggested Citation

  • So Young Sohn, 1994. "Monitoring declining quality of ammunition stockpile under step stress," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(6), pages 707-718, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:41:y:1994:i:6:p:707-718
    DOI: 10.1002/1520-6750(199410)41:63.0.CO;2-R
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6750(199410)41:63.0.CO;2-R
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/1520-6750(199410)41:63.0.CO;2-R?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ciriaco Valdez‐Flores & Richard M. Feldman, 1989. "A survey of preventive maintenance models for stochastically deteriorating single‐unit systems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(4), pages 419-446, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wooseung Jang & J. George Shanthikumar, 2002. "Stochastic allocation of inspection capacity to competitive processes," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 49(1), pages 78-94, February.
    2. V. Makis & X. Jiang & K. Cheng, 2000. "Optimal Preventive Replacement Under Minimal Repair and Random Repair Cost," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 141-156, February.
    3. Patrick H. Liu, 2000. "A comparative study of three tool replacement/operation sequencing strategies in a flexible manufacturing system," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 47(6), pages 479-499, September.
    4. Badía, F.G. & Berrade, M.D. & Cha, Ji Hwan & Lee, Hyunju, 2018. "Optimal replacement policy under a general failure and repair model: Minimal versus worse than old repair," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 362-372.
    5. Levitin, Gregory & Finkelstein, Maxim & Huang, Hong-Zhong, 2019. "Scheduling of imperfect inspections for reliability critical systems with shock-driven defects and delayed failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 89-98.
    6. Yasuhiro Saito & Tadashi Dohi & Won Y Yun, 2016. "Kernel-based nonparametric estimation methods for a periodic replacement problem with minimal repair," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 230(1), pages 54-66, February.
    7. Dmitry BANNIKOV & Nina SIRINA & Alexander SMOLYANINOV, 2018. "Model Of The Maintenance And Repair System In Service Maintenance Management," Transport Problems, Silesian University of Technology, Faculty of Transport, vol. 13(3), pages 5-14, September.
    8. Wang, Wei & Wu, Zhiying & Xiong, Junlin & Xu, Yaofeng, 2018. "Redundancy optimization of cold-standby systems under periodic inspection and maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 394-402.
    9. Lisa M. Maillart & Xiang Fang, 2006. "Optimal maintenance policies for serial, multi‐machine systems with non‐instantaneous repairs," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(8), pages 804-813, December.
    10. Scott G. Frickenstein & Lyn R. Whitaker, 2003. "Age replacement policies in two time scales," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 50(6), pages 592-613, September.
    11. Alireza Sabouri & Woonghee Tim Huh & Steven M. Shechter, 2017. "Screening Strategies for Patients on the Kidney Transplant Waiting List," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(5), pages 1131-1146, October.
    12. P Vrignat & M Avila & F Duculty & S Aupetit & M Slimane & F Kratz, 2012. "Maintenance policy: degradation laws versus hidden Markov model availability indicator," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 226(2), pages 137-155, April.
    13. Louis Anthony Cox & Yuping Qiu, 1994. "Optimal inspection and repair of renewable coherent systems with independent components and constant failure rates," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(6), pages 771-788, October.
    14. Yeek-Hyun Kim & Lyn Thomas, 2013. "Training and repair policies for stand-by systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 208(1), pages 469-487, September.
    15. Sarang Deo & Seyed Iravani & Tingting Jiang & Karen Smilowitz & Stephen Samuelson, 2013. "Improving Health Outcomes Through Better Capacity Allocation in a Community-Based Chronic Care Model," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(6), pages 1277-1294, December.
    16. Alaa H. Elwany & Nagi Z. Gebraeel & Lisa M. Maillart, 2011. "Structured Replacement Policies for Components with Complex Degradation Processes and Dedicated Sensors," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(3), pages 684-695, June.
    17. Xiaodong Yao & Xiaolan Xie & Michael C. Fu & Steven I. Marcus, 2005. "Optimal joint preventive maintenance and production policies," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(7), pages 668-681, October.
    18. Gert Heinrich & Uwe Jensen, 1992. "Optimal replacement rules based on different information levels," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(7), pages 937-955, December.
    19. H Li & Q Zhao, 2008. "Maintenance modelling and scheduling in fault-tolerant control," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 222(4), pages 553-560, December.
    20. Oguzhan Alagoz & Lisa M. Maillart & Andrew J. Schaefer & Mark S. Roberts, 2007. "Determining the Acceptance of Cadaveric Livers Using an Implicit Model of the Waiting List," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(1), pages 24-36, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:41:y:1994:i:6:p:707-718. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.