IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v41y1994i3p335-353.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preventive maintenance at opportunities of restricted duration

Author

Listed:
  • Rommert Dekker
  • Eric Smeitink

Abstract

This article deals with the problem of setting priorities for the execution of maintenance packages at randomly occurring opportunities. These opportunities are of restricted duration, implying that only a limited number of packages can be executed. The main idea proposed is to set up a model for determining the optimal execution time for the individual maintenance packages and to develop cost criteria for deviations from the optimal time. In this article we use the block replacement model, but the approach can be easily extended to include other optimization models as well. Using Monte Carlo simulation the performance of the method is compared with various heuristics, both for a two‐package and a multipackage case. © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Suggested Citation

  • Rommert Dekker & Eric Smeitink, 1994. "Preventive maintenance at opportunities of restricted duration," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(3), pages 335-353, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:41:y:1994:i:3:p:335-353
    DOI: 10.1002/1520-6750(199404)41:33.0.CO;2-M
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6750(199404)41:33.0.CO;2-M
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/1520-6750(199404)41:33.0.CO;2-M?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. van der Duyn Schouten, F. A. & Vanneste, S. G., 1990. "Analysis and computation of (n, N)-strategies for maintenance of a two-component system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 260-274, September.
    2. William P. Pierskalla & John A. Voelker, 1976. "A survey of maintenance models: The control and surveillance of deteriorating systems," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(3), pages 353-388, September.
    3. Ulusoy, Gunduz & Or, Ilhan & Soydan, Nezih, 1992. "Design and implementation of a maintenance planning and control system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 263-272, March.
    4. Y. S. Sherif & M. L. Smith, 1981. "Optimal maintenance models for systems subject to failure–A Review," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1), pages 47-74, March.
    5. Dekker, Rommert & Smeitink, Eric, 1991. "Opportunity-based block replacement," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 46-63, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Do Van, Phuc & Barros, Anne & Bérenguer, Christophe & Bouvard, Keomany & Brissaud, Florent, 2013. "Dynamic grouping maintenance with time limited opportunities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 51-59.
    2. Zheng, Junjun & Okamura, Hiroyuki & Dohi, Tadashi, 2021. "Age replacement with Markovian opportunity process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    3. Wu, Jing & Qian, Cunhua & Dohi, Tadashi, 2024. "Optimal opportunity-based age replacement policies in discrete time," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    4. Dekker, Rommert & Roelvink, Ingrid F. K., 1995. "Marginal cost criteria for preventive replacement of a group of components," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 84(2), pages 467-480, July.
    5. Rommert Dekker & Ralph Wildeman & Frank Duyn Schouten, 1997. "A review of multi-component maintenance models with economic dependence," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 45(3), pages 411-435, October.
    6. Jing Wu & Cunhua Qian & Tadashi Dohi, 2024. "A Net Present Value Analysis of Opportunity-Based Age Replacement Models in Discrete Time," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, May.
    7. Manar Altehmazi & Saad Suliman & Yaser Alalawi, 2017. "An Optimization Approach to the Preventive Maintenance Planning Process," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, September.
    8. Budai-Balke, G. & Dekker, R. & Nicolai, R.P., 2006. "A review of planning models for maintenance and production," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2006-44, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    9. Truong Ba, H. & Cholette, M.E. & Borghesani, P. & Zhou, Y. & Ma, L., 2017. "Opportunistic maintenance considering non-homogenous opportunity arrivals and stochastic opportunity durations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 151-161.
    10. Dekker, Rommert, 1995. "Integrating optimisation, priority setting, planning and combining of maintenance activities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(2), pages 225-240, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dmitry BANNIKOV & Nina SIRINA & Alexander SMOLYANINOV, 2018. "Model Of The Maintenance And Repair System In Service Maintenance Management," Transport Problems, Silesian University of Technology, Faculty of Transport, vol. 13(3), pages 5-14, September.
    2. James Flynn & Chia‐Shin Chung, 2002. "A branch and bound algorithm for computing optimal replacement policies in consecutive k‐out‐of‐n‐systems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 49(3), pages 288-302, April.
    3. Wang, Wei & Wu, Zhiying & Xiong, Junlin & Xu, Yaofeng, 2018. "Redundancy optimization of cold-standby systems under periodic inspection and maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 394-402.
    4. Wallace J. Hopp & Yar‐Lin Kuo, 1998. "Heuristics for multicomponent joint replacement: Applications to aircraft engine maintenance," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(5), pages 435-458, August.
    5. Lisa M. Maillart & Xiang Fang, 2006. "Optimal maintenance policies for serial, multi‐machine systems with non‐instantaneous repairs," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(8), pages 804-813, December.
    6. Alireza Sabouri & Woonghee Tim Huh & Steven M. Shechter, 2017. "Screening Strategies for Patients on the Kidney Transplant Waiting List," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(5), pages 1131-1146, October.
    7. Rommert Dekker & Ralph Wildeman & Frank Duyn Schouten, 1997. "A review of multi-component maintenance models with economic dependence," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 45(3), pages 411-435, October.
    8. Yeek-Hyun Kim & Lyn Thomas, 2013. "Training and repair policies for stand-by systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 208(1), pages 469-487, September.
    9. V. Jayabalan & Dipak Chaudhuri, 1992. "Optimal maintenance and replacement policy for a deteriorating system with increased mean downtime," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(1), pages 67-78, February.
    10. Wallace J. Hopp & Suresh K. Nair, 1991. "Timing replacement decisions under discontinuous technological change," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(2), pages 203-220, April.
    11. David T. Abdul‐Malak & Jeffrey P. Kharoufeh & Lisa M. Maillart, 2019. "Maintaining systems with heterogeneous spare parts," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 66(6), pages 485-501, September.
    12. Pinciroli, Luca & Baraldi, Piero & Zio, Enrico, 2023. "Maintenance optimization in industry 4.0," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    13. Wallace J. Hopp & Sung‐Chi Wu, 1988. "Multiaction maintenance under markovian deterioration and incomplete state information," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(5), pages 447-462, October.
    14. David L. Kaufman & Mark E. Lewis, 2007. "Machine maintenance with workload considerations," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(7), pages 750-766, October.
    15. Retsef Levi & Thomas Magnanti & Yaron Shaposhnik, 2019. "Scheduling with Testing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(2), pages 776-793, February.
    16. Yuri Merizalde & Luis Hernández-Callejo & Oscar Duque-Perez & Víctor Alonso-Gómez, 2019. "Maintenance Models Applied to Wind Turbines. A Comprehensive Overview," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-41, January.
    17. Steven M. Shechter & Matthew D. Bailey & Andrew J. Schaefer, 2008. "Replacing nonidentical vital components to extend system life," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(7), pages 700-703, October.
    18. Kut C. So, 1992. "Optimality of control limit policies in replacement models," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(5), pages 685-697, August.
    19. Ian M. Dobbs, 2004. "Replacement Investment: Optimal Economic Life Under Uncertainty," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5‐6), pages 729-757, June.
    20. Schouten, Thijs Nicolaas & Dekker, Rommert & Hekimoğlu, Mustafa & Eruguz, Ayse Sena, 2022. "Maintenance optimization for a single wind turbine component under time-varying costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(3), pages 979-991.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:41:y:1994:i:3:p:335-353. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.