IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v37y1990i6p981-995.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multiobjective flow‐shop scheduling

Author

Listed:
  • Richard L. Daniels
  • Robert J. Chambers

Abstract

Previous research on the scheduling of multimachine systems has generally focused on the optimization of individual performance measures. This article considers the sequencing of jobs through a multimachine flow shop, where the quality of the resulting schedule is evaluated according to the associated levels of two scheduling criteria, schedule makespan (Cmax) and maximum job tardiness (Tmax). We present constructive procedures that quantify the trade‐off between Cmax and Tmax. The significance of this trade‐off is that the optimal solution for any preference function involving only Cmax and Tmax must be contained among the set of efficient schedules that comprise the trade‐off curve. For the special case of two‐machine flow shops, we present an algorithm that identifies the exact set of efficient schedules. Heruistic procedures for approximating the efficient set are also provided for problems involving many jobs or larger flow shops. Computational results are reported for the procedures which indicate that both the number of efficient schedules and the error incurred by heuristically approximating the efficient set are quite small.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard L. Daniels & Robert J. Chambers, 1990. "Multiobjective flow‐shop scheduling," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(6), pages 981-995, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:37:y:1990:i:6:p:981-995
    DOI: 10.1002/1520-6750(199012)37:63.0.CO;2-H
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6750(199012)37:63.0.CO;2-H
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/1520-6750(199012)37:63.0.CO;2-H?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Van Wassenhove, Luk N. & Baker, Kenneth R., 1982. "A bicriterion approach to time/cost trade-offs in sequencing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 48-54, September.
    2. Rosser T. Nelson & Rakesh K. Sarin & Richard L. Daniels, 1986. "Scheduling with Multiple Performance Measures: The One-Machine Case," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 464-479, April.
    3. Tapan Sen & Farhad M. E. Raiszadeh & Parthasarati Dileepan, 1988. "Note---A Branch-and-Bound Approach to the Bicriterion Scheduling Problem Involving Total Flowtime and Range of Lateness," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 254-260, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiao, Liye & Shao, Wei & Yu, Mengxia & Ma, Jing & Jin, Congjun, 2017. "Research and application of a combined model based on multi-objective optimization for electrical load forecasting," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 1057-1074.
    2. Vincent T’kindt & Karima Bouibede-Hocine & Carl Esswein, 2007. "Counting and enumeration complexity with application to multicriteria scheduling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 153(1), pages 215-234, September.
    3. Yenisey, Mehmet Mutlu & Yagmahan, Betul, 2014. "Multi-objective permutation flow shop scheduling problem: Literature review, classification and current trends," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 119-135.
    4. Varadharajan, T.K. & Rajendran, Chandrasekharan, 2005. "A multi-objective simulated-annealing algorithm for scheduling in flowshops to minimize the makespan and total flowtime of jobs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(3), pages 772-795, December.
    5. Yepes-Borrero, Juan C. & Perea, Federico & Ruiz, Rubén & Villa, Fulgencia, 2021. "Bi-objective parallel machine scheduling with additional resources during setups," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(2), pages 443-455.
    6. Mohamed Anis Allouche, 2010. "Manager’s Preferences Modeling within Multi-Criteria Flowshop Scheduling Problem: A Metaheuristic Approach," International Journal of Business Research and Management (IJBRM), Computer Science Journals (CSC Journals), vol. 1(2), pages 33-45, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nagar, Amit & Haddock, Jorge & Heragu, Sunderesh, 1995. "Multiple and bicriteria scheduling: A literature survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 81(1), pages 88-104, February.
    2. R-H Huang & C-L Yang, 2009. "An algorithm for minimizing flow time and maximum earliness on a single machine," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(6), pages 873-877, June.
    3. Neppalli, Venkata Ranga & Chen, Chuen-Lung & Gupta, Jatinder N. D., 1996. "Genetic algorithms for the two-stage bicriteria flowshop problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(2), pages 356-373, December.
    4. Lee, Sang M. & Asllani, Arben A., 2004. "Job scheduling with dual criteria and sequence-dependent setups: mathematical versus genetic programming," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 145-153, April.
    5. Hoogeveen, Han, 2005. "Multicriteria scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(3), pages 592-623, December.
    6. Dhaenens-Flipo, Clarisse, 2001. "A bicriterion approach to deal with a constrained single-objective problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(1-3), pages 93-101, December.
    7. Lingfa Lu & Liqi Zhang, 2023. "Scheduling problems with rejection to minimize the k-th power of the makespan plus the total rejection cost," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 1-17, August.
    8. Choo Jun Tan & Siew Chin Neoh & Chee Peng Lim & Samer Hanoun & Wai Peng Wong & Chu Kong Loo & Li Zhang & Saeid Nahavandi, 2019. "Application of an evolutionary algorithm-based ensemble model to job-shop scheduling," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 879-890, February.
    9. Zhichao Geng & Jiayu Liu, 0. "Single machine batch scheduling with two non-disjoint agents and splitable jobs," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-22.
    10. Erenay, Fatih Safa & Sabuncuoglu, Ihsan & Toptal, Aysegül & Tiwari, Manoj Kumar, 2010. "New solution methods for single machine bicriteria scheduling problem: Minimization of average flowtime and number of tardy jobs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(1), pages 89-98, February.
    11. Vincent T’kindt & Karima Bouibede-Hocine & Carl Esswein, 2007. "Counting and enumeration complexity with application to multicriteria scheduling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 153(1), pages 215-234, September.
    12. Wan, Guohua & Vakati, Sudheer R. & Leung, Joseph Y.-T. & Pinedo, Michael, 2010. "Scheduling two agents with controllable processing times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(3), pages 528-539, September.
    13. Cheng, T. C. E. & Oguz, C. & Qi, X. D., 1996. "Due-date assignment and single machine scheduling with compressible processing times," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 29-35, May.
    14. Wang, Ji-Bo & Xia, Zun-Quan, 2007. "Single machine scheduling problems with controllable processing times and total absolute differences penalties," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(1), pages 638-645, February.
    15. Chen, Wei-Yang & Sheen, Gwo-Ji, 2007. "Single-machine scheduling with multiple performance measures: Minimizing job-dependent earliness and tardiness subject to the number of tardy jobs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(1-2), pages 214-229, September.
    16. Shioura, Akiyoshi & Shakhlevich, Natalia V. & Strusevich, Vitaly A., 2018. "Preemptive models of scheduling with controllable processing times and of scheduling with imprecise computation: A review of solution approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(3), pages 795-818.
    17. Yedidsion, Liron & Shabtay, Dvir & Korach, Ephraim & Kaspi, Moshe, 2009. "A bicriteria approach to minimize number of tardy jobs and resource consumption in scheduling a single machine," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(2), pages 298-307, June.
    18. Zhichao Geng & Jiayu Liu, 2020. "Single machine batch scheduling with two non-disjoint agents and splitable jobs," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 774-795, October.
    19. Tzafestas, Spyros & Triantafyllakis, Alekos, 1993. "Deterministic scheduling in computing and manufacturing systems: a survey of models and algorithms," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 397-434.
    20. T.C.E. Cheng & Zhi‐Long Chen & Chung‐Lun Li & B.M.‐T. Lin, 1998. "Scheduling to minimize the total compression and late costs," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(1), pages 67-82, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:37:y:1990:i:6:p:981-995. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.