IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v30y2021i3-4p454-465.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The use of the community of inquiry survey in blended learning pedagogy for a clinical skill‐based module

Author

Listed:
  • Chiew‐Jiat Siah
  • Fui‐Ping Lim
  • Siew‐Tiang Lau
  • Wilson Tam

Abstract

Aim and Objectives The primary aim of this study was to examine the effectiveness of the blended learning pedagogy in a clinical skill‐based module using the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework. The secondary objectives were to assess the effectiveness of blended learning in improving the nursing knowledge, and students' satisfaction with this approach. Background Blended learning is increasingly adopted in education as more online resources are made available for tutors to use for the benefit of their students. That implied a reduction in the face‐to‐face contact time in replacement for online teaching, which therefore warrants a need to examine the effectiveness of blended learning approach. The application of CoI framework could evaluate the blended learning approach to assist teaching faculty with evidence‐based practices on online teaching. Design This study used the quasi‐experimental, pretest–posttest design, and results were presented according to the Transparent Reporting of Evaluations with Nonrandomised Designs (TREND) guidelines. Methods This study was conducted in a university and recruited 219 Year 1 nursing students who completed a clinical‐based module. Results The results of the CoI survey found that teaching presence scored the highest mean, followed by cognitive and social presence. The design of the blended learning was effective in enhancing students' knowledge but they only expressed a moderate level of satisfaction. Conclusions Blended learning is a feasible pedagogical strategy for a clinical skill‐based module. However, further investigation is required to explore the factors and strategies which could improve students' satisfaction. Relevance to clinical practice Blended learning has become one of the contemporary trends in education. Refining teaching strategies may meet the learning needs of today's generation and improve students' learning outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Chiew‐Jiat Siah & Fui‐Ping Lim & Siew‐Tiang Lau & Wilson Tam, 2021. "The use of the community of inquiry survey in blended learning pedagogy for a clinical skill‐based module," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3-4), pages 454-465, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:30:y:2021:i:3-4:p:454-465
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15556
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15556
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15556?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amy Purling & Lindy King, 2012. "A literature review: graduate nurses' preparedness for recognising and responding to the deteriorating patient," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(23-24), pages 3451-3465, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elizabeth K. Herron, 2018. "New graduate nurses’ preparation for recognition and prevention of failure to rescue: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 390-401, January.
    2. Carol Della Ratta, 2018. "The art of balance: Preceptors’ experiences of caring for deteriorating patients," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(19-20), pages 3497-3509, October.
    3. Anna Willman & Kaisa Bjuresäter & Jan Nilsson, 2021. "Insufficiently supported in handling responsibility and demands: Findings from a qualitative study of newly graduated nurses," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1-2), pages 83-92, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:30:y:2021:i:3-4:p:454-465. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.