IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i9-10p1673-1683.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The operating room as a learning arena: Nurse anaesthetist and student nurse anaesthetist perceptions

Author

Listed:
  • Gertrud Averlid
  • Jakob S. Høglund

Abstract

Aim To examine which competencies mentors and student nurse anaesthetists perceive as important in a clinical anaesthesia education practice. Background Mentoring during clinical placement in the operating room can be challenging from the viewpoint of both a nurse anaesthetist and their students. The operating room is a work environment with many restrictions, and the nurse anaesthetist's work requires prompt decisions and actions. Simultaneously, the mentor is tasked with guiding and supporting the student. Method A qualitative approach including two focus group interviews was used. The analysis was conducted using systematic text condensation. The COREQ checklist for qualitative studies was applied. Result The analysis yielded two main categories, including two sub‐categories for each. The first, “Mentoring in the operating room,” contained sub‐categories “Application of knowledge and expectations” and “Mentoring experiences,” and the second, “Creating a good climate for learning,” contained sub‐categories “Impact on mentoring: human factors” and “Impact on mentoring: obstacle factors.” The mentor's knowledge of human relationships and learning strategies emerged as an important factor with the potential to influence the students’ learning and self‐confidence. Another valuable consideration was the ability to give constructive feedback, from the perspective of both. However, production pressure was a negative factor for effective knowledge transition. Conclusions The ability to give constructive feedback and having an awareness of one's own attitude—which should ideally be positive and inclusive—are crucial mentoring skills. Mutual expectations must be clearly communicated before the clinical placement period, including learning assumptions, a progression plan and learning outcomes. This will facilitate the planning and help to direct the optimal course of learning. Implications for clinical practice This study highlights that an awareness of the student's vulnerability and the mentor's pedagogical competence and learning strategy are crucial factors to take into account.

Suggested Citation

  • Gertrud Averlid & Jakob S. Høglund, 2020. "The operating room as a learning arena: Nurse anaesthetist and student nurse anaesthetist perceptions," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(9-10), pages 1673-1683, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:9-10:p:1673-1683
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15227
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15227
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15227?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kirsten Jack & Claire Hamshire & W. Edwin Harris & Mark Langan & Neil Barrett & Christopher Wibberley, 2018. "“My mentor didn't speak to me for the first four weeks”: Perceived Unfairness experienced by nursing students in clinical practice settings," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5-6), pages 929-938, March.
    2. Kristiina Helminen & Martin Johnson & Hannu Isoaho & Hannele Turunen & Kerttu Tossavainen, 2017. "Final assessment of nursing students in clinical practice: Perspectives of nursing teachers, students and mentors," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4795-4803, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sari Pramila‐Savukoski & Jonna Juntunen & Anna‐Maria Tuomikoski & Maria Kääriäinen & Marco Tomietto & Boris Miha Kaučič & Bojana Filej & Olga Riklikiene & Maria Flores Vizcaya‐Moreno & Rosa M Perez‐Ca, 2020. "Mentors' self‐assessed competence in mentoring nursing students in clinical practice: A systematic review of quantitative studies," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5-6), pages 684-705, March.
    2. Thi Tuan Linh Pham & Ching‐I Teng & Daniel Friesner & Kai Li & Wan‐Er Wu & Yen‐Ni Liao & Yin‐Tzu Chang & Tsung‐Lan Chu, 2019. "The impact of mentor–mentee rapport on nurses’ professional turnover intention: Perspectives of social capital theory and social cognitive career theory," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(13-14), pages 2669-2680, July.
    3. Llewellyn Ellardus Zyl, 2021. "Social Study Resources and Social Wellbeing Before and During the Intelligent COVID-19 Lockdown in The Netherlands," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 157(1), pages 393-415, August.
    4. Merja Männistö & Kristina Mikkonen & Heli-Maria Kuivila & Camilla Koskinen & Meeri Koivula & Tuulikki Sjögren & Leena Salminen & Terhi Saaranen & Helvi Kyngäs & Maria Kääriäinen, 2020. "Health and Social Care Educators’ Competence in Digital Collaborative Learning: A Cross-Sectional Survey," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:9-10:p:1673-1683. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.