IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i21-22p4180-4193.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Use of an audit with feedback implementation strategy to promote medication error reporting by nurses

Author

Listed:
  • Alison M. Hutchinson
  • Vanessa Brotto
  • Anna Chapman
  • Anne E. Sales
  • Mohammadreza Mohebbi
  • Tracey K. Bucknall

Abstract

Aims and objectives To outline the development and effect of an audit with feedback implementation strategy that intended to increase the rate of voluntary medication error reporting by nurses. Background Medication errors are a serious global health issue. Audit with feedback is a widely used implementation strategy that has potential to modify nurses’ reporting behaviour and improve medication error reporting rates. Design Quasi‐experimental implementation study (fulfilling the TIDieR checklist) with two pairs of matched wards at a private hospital in Australia was conducted from March 2015–September 2016. One ward from each pair was randomised to either the intervention or control group. Method Nurses within intervention wards received audit with feedback on a quarterly basis over a 12‐month implementation period. Control wards underwent quarterly audits only (without feedback). Feedback consisted of a one‐page infographic poster, with content based on medication error data obtained from audits and the hospitals’ risk management system (RiskMan). The primary outcome—rate of medication errors reported per month—was determined in both groups at pre‐implementation, implementation and postimplementation phases. Differences between groups were compared using generalised linear mixed models with Poisson distribution and log link. Results A nonsignificant intervention effect was found for rate of medication errors reported per month. Interestingly, when combining data from both groups, a significant increasing time trend was observed for medication errors reported per month across pre‐implementation and implementation phases (80% increase). Conclusions The audit with feedback strategy developed in the present study did not effectively influence the voluntary reporting of medication errors by nurses. Relevance to clinical practice Despite the lack of intervention effects, the use of a published checklist to optimise the reporting quality of this study will contribute to the field by furthering the understanding of how to enhance audit with feedback implementation strategies for nurses.

Suggested Citation

  • Alison M. Hutchinson & Vanessa Brotto & Anna Chapman & Anne E. Sales & Mohammadreza Mohebbi & Tracey K. Bucknall, 2020. "Use of an audit with feedback implementation strategy to promote medication error reporting by nurses," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(21-22), pages 4180-4193, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:21-22:p:4180-4193
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15447
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15447
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15447?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nesreen Mohamed Kamal Elden & Amira Ismail, 2016. "The Importance of Medication Errors Reporting in Improving the Quality of Clinical Care Services," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(8), pages 243-243, August.
    2. Shmueli, Amir & Savage, Elizabeth, 2014. "Private and public patients in public hospitals in Australia," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 189-195.
    3. repec:mpr:mprres:7317 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Francisco Miguel Escandell-Rico & Juana Perpiñá-Galvañ & Lucía Pérez-Fernández & Ángela Sanjuán-Quiles & Piedras Albas Gómez-Beltrán & Juan Diego Ramos-Pichardo, 2021. "Nurses’ Perceptions on the Implementation of a Safe Drug Administration Protocol and Its Effect on Error Notification," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-10, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mi Ok Song & Suhyun Kim, 2023. "The Experience of Patient Safety Error for Nursing Students in COVID-19: Focusing on King’s Conceptual System Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-13, February.
    2. Xidong Guo & Eóin T. Flaherty & Huihui Li & Jiming Zhu, 2024. "The More Private Patients, the Fewer Public Patients? Evaluating the 2014 Hospitals Reform in Ireland," Working Papers 202403, Geary Institute, University College Dublin.
    3. Whyte, Richard & Connolly, Sheelah & Wren, Maev-Ann, 2020. "Insurance status and waiting times for hospital-based services in Ireland," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(11), pages 1174-1181.
    4. Jang, Sung-In & Yi, Sang-Wook & Sull, Jae-Woong & Park, Eun-Cheol & Kim, Jae-Hyun & Ohrr, Heechoul, 2015. "Association between all-cause mortality and insurance status transition among the elderly population in a rural area in Korea: Kangwha Cohort Study," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(5), pages 680-687.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:21-22:p:4180-4193. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.