IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i13-14p2495-2507.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Becoming a good nurse – Socialisation of newly employed nurses into the oncological clinic

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandra Pettersson
  • Stinne Glasdam

Abstract

Aim and objectives To explore newly employed nurses’ socialisation in the process of introduction into an oncological clinic from the perspectives of unit managers and newly employed nurses. Background There are managerial challenges in retaining nurses at workplaces. The way in which nurses are socialised into their work is important for their job satisfaction and retainment. Method Qualitative, semi‐structured interviews with seven nurses and two unit managers, and written introductory material. Thematic analyses were made, inspired by Goffman's concepts of social interaction, back stage, front stage and roles. SRQR checklist was used. Results Unit managers created the framework for socialising newly employed nurses through written introductory guidelines and assignments of supervisors as mainstream role models. Newly employed nurses were socialised gradually through mirroring their supervisors in their role as nurse. Front stage, patients often functioned as objects for newly employed nurses’ training. Back stage, patients often functioned as communication objects for all professionals. Newly employed nurses, who also demand roles such as transformer, boss, coordinator, prompter and friend, were socialised into the role of assistant to the doctor. Medical rounds functioned as a socialisator in this process. Conclusion The allocated supervisors were role models in socialising newly employed nurses into an oncological clinic and its culture. Nurses were socialised into an understanding of care as a biomedical orientation, in which medicine had a higher value than care in the existing knowledge hierarchy at the oncological clinic. This might have implications for who applies for and stays in the job. Relevance to clinical practice Increased awareness of the importance of socialisation of nurses into the clinic during the introduction process. Re‐thinking nurses’ independent functions and patient perspectives in introduction of newly employed nurses to maintain and develop nursing as an independent profession.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandra Pettersson & Stinne Glasdam, 2020. "Becoming a good nurse – Socialisation of newly employed nurses into the oncological clinic," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2495-2507, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:13-14:p:2495-2507
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15265
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15265
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15265?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jackie Lea & Mary Cruickshank, 2015. "Supporting new graduate nurses making the transition to rural nursing practice: views from experienced rural nurses," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(19-20), pages 2826-2834, October.
    2. Catharina Frid Annerstedt & Stinne Glasdam, 2019. "Nurses' attitudes towards support for and communication about sexual health—A qualitative study from the perspectives of oncological nurses," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(19-20), pages 3556-3566, October.
    3. Jackie Lea & Mary Cruickshank, 2015. "The support needs of new graduate nurses making the transition to rural nursing practice in Australia," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(7-8), pages 948-960, April.
    4. Scheffler, Richard M. & Arnold, Daniel R., 2019. "Projecting shortages and surpluses of doctors and nurses in the OECD: what looms ahead," Health Economics, Policy and Law, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(2), pages 274-290, April.
    5. Marlen Rahnfeld & Johannes Wendsche & Andreas Ihle & Sandrine R. Müller & Matthias Kliegel, 2016. "Uncovering the care setting–turnover intention relationship of geriatric nurses," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 159-169, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amanda C Fowler & Diane Twigg & Elisabeth Jacob & Barbara Nattabi, 2018. "An integrative review of rural and remote nursing graduate programmes and experiences of nursing graduates," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5-6), pages 753-766, March.
    2. Clare Harvey & Desley Hegney & Agnieszka Sobolewska & Diane Chamberlain & Elspeth Wood & Lisa Wirihana & Sandy Mclellan & Joyce Hendricks & Troy Wake, 2019. "Developing a community-based nursing and midwifery career pathway – A narrative systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-16, March.
    3. Kelly L. Penz & Norma J. Stewart & Chandima P. Karunanayake & Julie G. Kosteniuk & Martha L. P. MacLeod, 2019. "Competence and confidence in rural and remote nursing practice: A structural equation modelling analysis of national data," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(9-10), pages 1664-1679, May.
    4. Michael Clinton & Murielle Madi & Myrna Doumit & Sawsan Ezzeddine & Ursula Rizk, 2018. "“My Greatest Fear Is Becoming a Robot†: The Paradox of Transitioning to Nursing Practice in Lebanon," SAGE Open, , vol. 8(2), pages 21582440187, June.
    5. Melanie Murray & Deborah Sundin & Vicki Cope, 2019. "New graduate nurses’ understanding and attitudes about patient safety upon transition to practice," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(13-14), pages 2543-2552, July.
    6. Rahimah Jurij & Ida Rosnita Ismail & Khadijah Alavi & Rokiah Alavi, 2023. "Eldercare’s Turnover Intention and Human Resource Approach: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-16, February.
    7. Mats Nylén‐Eriksen & Ellen Karine Grov & Ann Kristin Bjørnnes, 2020. "Nurses' job involvement and association with continuing current position—A descriptive comparative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2699-2709, July.
    8. Natalia Cecon & Theresia Krieger & Sandra Salm & Holger Pfaff & Antje Dresen, 2022. "Salutogenesis at Work as a Facilitator for Implementation? An Explorative Study on the Relationship of Job Demands, Job Resources and the Work-Related Sense of Coherence within a Complex Healthcare Pr," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-20, February.
    9. Romain Biard & Marc Deschamps & Mostapha Diss & Alexis Roussel, 2024. "Assessing Available Care Time and Nursing Shortage in a Hospital," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 26(02), pages 1-26, June.
    10. Leonarda G. M. Bremmers & Leona Hakkaart-van Roijen & Eleonora S. Gräler & Carin A. Uyl-de Groot & Isabelle N. Fabbricotti, 2022. "How Do Shifts in Patients with Mental Health Problems’ Formal and Informal Care Utilization Affect Informal Caregivers?: A COVID-19 Case Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-16, December.
    11. Chevillard, Guillaume & Mousquès, Julien, 2021. "Medically underserved areas: are primary care teams efficient at attracting and retaining general practitioners?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    12. Mustafa Akan, 2019. "Optimal Control Theoretic Approach To Investment In Doctors," Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 8(4), pages 91-111.
    13. Jessica Scharf & Patricia Vu-Eickmann & Jian Li & Andreas Müller & Peter Angerer & Adrian Loerbroks, 2019. "Work-Related Intervention Needs and Potential Occupational Outcomes among Medical Assistants: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-14, June.
    14. Åhlin, Philip & Almström, Peter & Wänström, Carl, 2022. "When patients get stuck: A systematic literature review on throughput barriers in hospital-wide patient processes," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(2), pages 87-98.
    15. Eilís M. McCaughan & Carrie Flannagan & Kader Parahoo & Sharon L. Bingham & Nuala Brady & John Connaghan & Roma Maguire & Samantha Thompson & Suneil Jain & Michael Kirby & Seán R. O’Connor, 2021. "Effects of a Brief E-Learning Resource on Sexual Attitudes and Beliefs of Healthcare Professionals Working in Prostate Cancer Care: A Pilot Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-11, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:13-14:p:2495-2507. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.