IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i1-2p53-59.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

12‐hr shifts in nursing: Do they remove unproductive time and information loss or do they reduce education and discussion opportunities for nurses? A cross‐sectional study in 12 European countries

Author

Listed:
  • Chiara Dall’Ora
  • Peter Griffiths
  • Talia Emmanuel
  • Anne Marie Rafferty
  • Sean Ewings
  • the RN4CAST Consortium

Abstract

Aims and objectives To examine the association between registered nurses' (referred to as “nurses” for brevity) shifts of 12 hr or more and presence of continuing educational programmes; ability to discuss patient care with other nurses; assignments that foster continuity of care; and patient care information being lost during handovers. Background The introduction of long shifts (i.e., shifts of 12 hr or more) remains controversial. While there are claims of efficiency, studies have shown long shifts to be associated with adverse effects on quality of care. Efficiency claims are predicated on the assumption that long shifts reduce overlaps between shifts; these overlaps are believed to be unproductive and dangerous. However, there are potentially valuable educational and communication activities that occur during these overlaps. Design Cross‐sectional survey of 31,627 nurses within 487 hospitals in 12 European countries. Methods The associations were measured through generalised linear mixed models. The study methods were compliant with the STROBE checklist. Results When nurses worked shifts of 12 hr or more, they were less likely to report having continuing educational programmes; and time to discuss patient care with other nurses, compared to nurses working 8 hr or less. Nurses working shifts of 12 hr or more were less likely to report assignments that foster continuity of care, albeit the association was not significant. Similarly, working long shifts was associated with reports of patient care information being lost during handovers, although association was not significant. Conclusion Working shifts of 12 hr or more is associated with reduced educational activities and fewer opportunities to discuss patient care, with potential negative consequences for safe and effective care. Relevance to clinical practice Implementation of long shifts should be questioned, as reduced opportunity to discuss care or participate in educational activities may jeopardise the quality and safety of care for patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Chiara Dall’Ora & Peter Griffiths & Talia Emmanuel & Anne Marie Rafferty & Sean Ewings & the RN4CAST Consortium, 2020. "12‐hr shifts in nursing: Do they remove unproductive time and information loss or do they reduce education and discussion opportunities for nurses? A cross‐sectional study in 12 European countries," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(1-2), pages 53-59, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:1-2:p:53-59
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14977
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14977
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14977?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sheri Price & Carol Reichert, 2017. "The Importance of Continuing Professional Development to Career Satisfaction and Patient Care: Meeting the Needs of Novice to Mid- to Late-Career Nurses throughout Their Career Span," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-13, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xuelin Chen & Mohammad Masukujjaman & Abdullah Al Mamun & Jingzu Gao & Zafir Khan Mohamed Makhbul, 2023. "Modeling the significance of work culture on burnout, satisfaction, and psychological distress among the Gen-Z workforce in an emerging country," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Tore Bonsaksen & Sissel Horghagen & Cathrine Arntzen & Astrid Gramstad & Linda Stigen, 2023. "Job Satisfaction among Occupational Therapists Employed in Primary Care Services in Norway," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-11, March.
    3. Maggie Nyelisani & Lufuno Makhado & Takalani Luhalima, 2023. "Professional Nurses’ Experiences Regarding Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Opportunities at Public Hospitals of Limpopo Province, South Africa," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, November.
    4. Sun-Joo Jang & Haeyoung Lee & Youn-Jung Son, 2021. "Perceptions of Patient Safety Culture and Medication Error Reporting among Early- and Mid-Career Female Nurses in South Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-11, May.
    5. Mingxiao Lu & Abdullah Al Mamun & Xuelin Chen & Qing Yang & Mohammad Masukujjaman, 2023. "Quiet quitting during COVID-19: the role of psychological empowerment," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Ubas-Sumagasyay, Nicolette Anne & Oducado, Ryan Michael, 2020. "Perceived Competence and Transition Experience of New Graduate Filipino Nurses," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 23(1), pages 48-63.
    7. Ferry Efendi & Anna Kurniati & Angeline Bushy & Joko Gunawan, 2019. "Concept analysis of nurse retention," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(4), pages 422-427, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:1-2:p:53-59. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.