IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i1-2p240-250.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“It’s got its own life, and you can’t contain it”: A qualitative study of patient and health professional experiences of diabetes care

Author

Listed:
  • Jennifer Watermeyer
  • Victoria Hume
  • Tshegofatso Seabi
  • Bruno Pauly

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore the perspectives of patients and health professionals on facilitators and barriers to care in a diabetes clinic in urban South Africa. Background Although much attention has been given to the science behind diabetes management, a qualitative approach to exploring experiences, facilitators and barriers to care may have considerable value in understanding and improving diabetes care. Design We conducted a qualitative study in the context of a 3‐year collaboration at a diabetes clinic. The present study formed part of the preparatory phase to the larger project. Methods Linguistically and culturally matched research assistants collected data over a period of 18 months. Methods included interviews, focus groups, ethnographic observations and informal discussions with 38 patients and health professionals. Data from each participant group were transcribed, translated and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis principles and thereafter triangulated. The Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist was followed. Results Initial findings suggest that factors can be classified into three overarching themes: relationships, health systems and the interplay between disease and the lifeworld. System resource pressures, the nuances of team interactions and a complex healthcare site may adversely affect care, even at sites where there are elements of good practice. Conclusions The collective psychosocial experience of patients appears to conflict with the biomedical approach to diabetes management. The all‐consuming nature of the disease, together with contextual and systemic factors, plays a significant role in influencing experiences of care. Relevance to clinical practice While systemic and contextual influences on experiences of diabetes care may be difficult to modify, our study suggests a need to focus on ways of enhancing relationships within the clinic and seeking to understand the lifeworld of the patient.

Suggested Citation

  • Jennifer Watermeyer & Victoria Hume & Tshegofatso Seabi & Bruno Pauly, 2020. "“It’s got its own life, and you can’t contain it”: A qualitative study of patient and health professional experiences of diabetes care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(1-2), pages 240-250, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:1-2:p:240-250
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15086
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15086
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15086?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Victor Mogre & Natalie A. Johnson & Flora Tzelepis & Christine Paul, 2019. "Barriers to diabetic self‐care: A qualitative study of patients’ and healthcare providers’ perspectives," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(11-12), pages 2296-2308, June.
    2. Barry, Christine A. & Stevenson, Fiona A. & Britten, Nicky & Barber, Nick & Bradley, Colin P., 2001. "Giving voice to the lifeworld. More humane, more effective medical care? A qualitative study of doctor-patient communication in general practice," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 487-505, August.
    3. Kate Claydon‐Platt & Elizabeth Manias & Trisha Dunning, 2014. "The barriers and facilitators people with diabetes from a nonEnglish speaking background experience when managing their medications: a qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(15-16), pages 2234-2246, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Weiste, Elina & Peräkylä, Anssi & Valkeapää, Taina & Savander, Enikö & Hintikka, Jukka, 2018. "Institutionalised otherness: Patients references to psychiatric diagnostic categories," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 71-79.
    2. Doblytė, Sigita, 2022. "The vicious cycle of distrust: Access, quality, and efficiency within a post-communist mental health system," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    3. Murdoch, Jamie & Salter, Charlotte & Ford, John & Lenaghan, Elizabeth & Shiner, Alice & Steel, Nicholas, 2020. "The “unknown territory” of goal-setting: Negotiating a novel interactional activity within primary care doctor-patient consultations for patients with multiple chronic conditions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    4. Fudge, Nina & Swinglehurst, Deborah, 2022. "Keeping in balance on the multimorbidity tightrope: A narrative analysis of older patients’ experiences of living with and managing multimorbidity," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    5. Hardman, Doug & Geraghty, Adam W.A. & Lown, Mark & Bishop, Felicity L., 2020. "Subjunctive medicine: Enacting efficacy in general practice," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    6. Lo, Ming-Cheng Miriam & Bahar, Roxana, 2013. "Resisting the colonization of the lifeworld? Immigrant patients' experiences with co-ethnic healthcare workers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 68-76.
    7. Ahmad Salman & Kingsley Nnanna Ukwaja & Ahmad Alkhatib, 2019. "Factors Associated with Meeting Current Recommendation for Physical Activity in Scottish Adults with Diabetes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-10, October.
    8. Ariss, Steven M., 2009. "Asymmetrical knowledge claims in general practice consultations with frequently attending patients: Limitations and opportunities for patient participation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(6), pages 908-919, September.
    9. Martin, Graham P. & Chew, Sarah & Dixon-Woods, Mary, 2021. "Why do systems for responding to concerns and complaints so often fail patients, families and healthcare staff? A qualitative study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    10. Waring, Justin & Latif, Asam & Boyd, Matthew & Barber, Nick & Elliott, Rachel, 2016. "Pastoral power in the community pharmacy: A Foucauldian analysis of services to promote patient adherence to new medicine use," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 123-130.
    11. May, Carl & Rapley, Tim & Moreira, Tiago & Finch, Tracy & Heaven, Ben, 2006. "Technogovernance: Evidence, subjectivity, and the clinical encounter in primary care medicine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(4), pages 1022-1030, February.
    12. Sarah Jane Brubaker, 2024. "Toward a Critical Sociology of Campus Sexual Assault: Victim Advocacy as the Lifeworld Resisting the System," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-16, February.
    13. Leanza, Yvan & Boivin, Isabelle & Rosenberg, Ellen, 2010. "Interruptions and resistance: A comparison of medical consultations with family and trained interpreters," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(12), pages 1888-1895, June.
    14. Judith M. Ochieng & Janice D. Crist, 2021. "Social Determinants of Health and Health Care Delivery: African American Women’s T2DM Self-Management," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 30(3), pages 263-272, March.
    15. Mohammed Amin & Debra Kerr & Yacoba Atiase & Misbah Muhammad Samir & Andrea Driscoll, 2023. "Improving Metabolic Syndrome in Ghanaian Adults with Type 2 Diabetes through a Home-Based Physical Activity Program: A Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(8), pages 1-12, April.
    16. Daker-White, Gavin & Rogers, Anne & Kennedy, Anne & Blakeman, Thomas & Blickem, Christian & Chew-Graham, Carolyn, 2015. "Non-disclosure of chronic kidney disease in primary care and the limits of instrumental rationality in chronic illness self-management," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 31-39.
    17. Gately, Claire & Rogers, Anne & Sanders, Caroline, 2007. "Re-thinking the relationship between long-term condition self-management education and the utilisation of health services," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(5), pages 934-945, September.
    18. Lynch, Johanna M. & Askew, Deborah A. & Mitchell, Geoffrey K. & Hegarty, Kelsey L., 2012. "Beyond symptoms: Defining primary care mental health clinical assessment priorities, content and process," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(2), pages 143-149.
    19. Williams, Kevin Frank, 2007. "Re-examining 'professionalism' in pharmacy: A South African perspective," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(6), pages 1285-1296, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:1-2:p:240-250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.