IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i9-10p1643-1652.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preventing surgical site infections: Facilitators and barriers to nurses’ adherence to clinical practice guidelines—A qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Frances Lin
  • Brigid M. Gillespie
  • Wendy Chaboyer
  • Yu Li
  • Karen Whitelock
  • Nicola Morley
  • Shirley Morrissey
  • Frances O’Callaghan
  • Andrea P. Marshall

Abstract

Aims To identify the facilitators of and barriers to nurses’ adherence to evidence‐based wound care clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) in preventing surgical site infections (SSIs) in an Australian tertiary hospital. Background Current research suggests that up to 50% of nurses are unaware of the evidence‐based recommendations to prevent SSIs and that adherence to evidence‐based CPGs is suboptimal. However, little is known regarding the facilitators and barriers to adherence to evidence‐based CPGs. Design A qualitative study incorporating ethnographic data collection techniques. Methods Data collection included semi‐structured individual interviews and focus groups (N = 20), and examination of existing hospital policy and procedure documents. Thematic analysis using inductive and deductive approaches was conducted. This manuscript adheres to the COnsolidated criteria for REporting Qualitative research (COREQ) guidelines. Findings Data analysis revealed four themes: adhering to aseptic technique, knowledge and information seeking, documenting wound care and educating and involving patients in wound care. Facilitators and barriers within each theme were identified. Facilitators included participants’ active information‐seeking behaviour, a clear understanding of the importance of aseptic technique, and patient participation in wound care. Barriers included participants’ knowledge and skills deficits regarding application of aseptic technique principles in practice, the availability of the hospital's wound care procedure document, suboptimal wound care documentation and the timing of patient education. Conclusions There is a need to develop interventions to improve nurses’ adherence to recommended CPGs including following aseptic technique principles, hand hygiene, documentation and patient education. Hospital procedure documents that outline wound care need to reflect current recommended CPGs. Relevance to clinical practice Adhering to evidence‐based CPGs has been found to be effective in reducing and preventing SSIs. Our study provides an in‐depth understanding of the barriers and facilitators to nurses’ adherence to recommended CPGs. The findings may inform future practice improvements in wound care.

Suggested Citation

  • Frances Lin & Brigid M. Gillespie & Wendy Chaboyer & Yu Li & Karen Whitelock & Nicola Morley & Shirley Morrissey & Frances O’Callaghan & Andrea P. Marshall, 2019. "Preventing surgical site infections: Facilitators and barriers to nurses’ adherence to clinical practice guidelines—A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(9-10), pages 1643-1652, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:9-10:p:1643-1652
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14766
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14766
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14766?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brigid M Gillespie & Wendy Chaboyer & Evelyn Kang & Jayne Hewitt & Paul Nieuwenhoven & Nicola Morley, 2014. "Postsurgery wound assessment and management practices: a chart audit," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(21-22), pages 3250-3261, November.
    2. Andrea P Marshall & Sandra H West & Leanne M Aitken, 2013. "Clinical credibility and trustworthiness are key characteristics used to identify colleagues from whom to seek information," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(9-10), pages 1424-1433, May.
    3. Brigid M Gillespie & Wendy Chaboyer & Pamela Allen & Nicola Morely & Paul Nieuwenhoven, 2014. "Wound care practices: a survey of acute care nurses," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(17-18), pages 2618-2627, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jimson Joseph Chumbula & Umoh, Edet O. (PhD) & Endra, Michael & Otosi, Okosienen & Anake, Monday & Nkanga, Dominic & Unwana, Udomoh & Usani, Patrick & Ejoh, Vincent & Amu, Denis, 2020. "Patients’ Relative Satisfaction with Nursing Care: A Case Study of Federal Neuro-Psychiatric Hospital, Calabar," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 4(12), pages 163-172, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kai Klinker & Manuel Wiesche & Helmut Krcmar, 2020. "Digital Transformation in Health Care: Augmented Reality for Hands-Free Service Innovation," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 1419-1431, December.
    2. Kostagiolas, Petros & Korfiatis, Nikolaos & Kourouthanasis, Panos & Alexias, Georgios, 2014. "Work-related factors influencing doctors search behaviors and trust toward medical information resources," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 80-88.
    3. Min Sook Park & JungHo Park & Hyejin Kim & Jin Hui Lee & Hyejin Park, 2023. "Measuring the impacts of quantity and trustworthiness of information on COVID‐19 vaccination intent," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(7), pages 846-865, July.
    4. Sriyani A. Kumarasinghe & Priyadarshika Hettiarachchi & Sudharshani Wasalathanthri, 2018. "Nurses' knowledge on diabetic foot ulcer disease and their attitudes towards patients affected: A cross‐sectional institution‐based study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 203-212, January.
    5. Brigid M. Gillespie & Rachel Walker & Frances Lin & Shelley Roberts & Anne Eskes & Jodie Perry & Sean Birgan & Paul Nieuwenhoven & Elizabeth Garrahy & Rosalind Probert & Wendy Chaboyer, 2020. "Wound care practices across two acute care settings: A comparative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5-6), pages 831-839, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:9-10:p:1643-1652. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.