IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i15-16p2880-2888.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relationship between psychosocial adaptation and health‐related quality of life of patients with stoma: A descriptive, cross‐sectional study

Author

Listed:
  • Yu Zhang
  • Hongtao Xian
  • Yang Yang
  • Xiaoxue Zhang
  • Xinran Wang

Abstract

Objective To investigate the relationship between psychosocial adaptation and quality of life of patients with ostomies and to provide reference data for clinical care practice. Background Surgical enterostomy impacts the life of patient. Most patients are transferred to home or community hospital after discharge and require long‐term nursing care. These patients typically face problems with physical, psychological and social adaptation. Design Descriptive, cross‐sectional study. Methods Between March 2017–June 2017, the following questionnaires were electronically administered to 1,053 patients with enterostomy residing in 22 provinces, 4 autonomous regions for ethnic minorities and 4 direct‐controlled municipalities in China: Social Support Revalued Scale, validated Chinese version of Ostomy Adjustment Inventory and Stoma‐Quality of life‐Chinese. Univariate analysis, correlation analysis and hierarchical regression analysis were used to assess the relationship between adaptation level and quality of life of patients with enterostomy, in order to provide reference data for clinical care practice and further improve the quality of life of these patients. The STROBE checklist was used in reporting this study. Results The mean score for psychosocial adaptation was 43.13 ± 13.09, which corresponded to a medium level; the mean score for quality of life was 56.54 ± 16.87. The level of psychosocial adaptation and each dimension showed a positive correlation with the quality of life of patient and each dimension (r = 0.349–0.890, p

Suggested Citation

  • Yu Zhang & Hongtao Xian & Yang Yang & Xiaoxue Zhang & Xinran Wang, 2019. "Relationship between psychosocial adaptation and health‐related quality of life of patients with stoma: A descriptive, cross‐sectional study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(15-16), pages 2880-2888, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:15-16:p:2880-2888
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14876
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14876
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14876?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hunt, Sonja M. & McKenna, Stephen P., 1992. "The QLDS: A scale for the measurement of quality of life in depression," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 307-319, October.
    2. Schroevers, Maya & Ranchor, Adelita V. & Sanderman, Robbert, 2006. "Adjustment to cancer in the 8 years following diagnosis: A longitudinal study comparing cancer survivors with healthy individuals," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 598-610, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jie Yin & Youcheng Chen & Yingchao Ji, 2021. "Effect of the event strength of the coronavirus disease (COVID‐19) on potential online organic agricultural product consumption and rural health tourism opportunities," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(5), pages 1156-1171, July.
    2. Andrea Emilie Mørkhagen & Line Nortvedt, 2023. "A Qualitative Study on How Younger Women Experience Living with an Ostomy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(9), pages 1-13, April.
    3. Xi Zhang & Rui Gao & Jin Ling Lin & Ning Chen & Qin Lin & Gui Fang Huang & Long Wang & Xiao Huan Chen & Fang Qin Xue & Hong Li, 2020. "Effects of hospital‐family holistic care model on the health outcome of patients with permanent enterostomy based on the theory of ‘Timing It Right’," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2196-2208, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ranchor, Adelita V. & Wardle, Jane & Steptoe, Andrew & Henselmans, Inge & Ormel, Johan & Sanderman, Robbert, 2010. "The adaptive role of perceived control before and after cancer diagnosis: A prospective study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(11), pages 1825-1831, June.
    2. Marieke Krol & Jocé Papenburg & Marc Koopmanschap & Werner Brouwer, 2011. "Do Productivity Costs Matter?," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 29(7), pages 601-619, July.
    3. Neusa Sica Rocha & Mick J. Power & Donald M. Bushnell & Marcelo P. Fleck, 2012. "Cross-Cultural Evaluation of the WHOQOL-BREF Domains in Primary Care Depressed Patients Using Rasch Analysis," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 32(1), pages 41-55, January.
    4. Jan R. Oyebode & Simon Pini & Emma Ingleson & Molly Megson & Mike Horton & Linda Clare & Hareth Al-Janabi & Carol Brayne & Penny Wright, 2019. "Development of an Item Pool for a Needs-Based Measure of Quality of Life of Carers of a Family Member with Dementia," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 12(1), pages 125-136, February.
    5. J. Busschbach & B. Wolffenbuttel & L. Annemans & W. Meerding & M. Kołtowska-Häggström, 2011. "Deriving reference values and utilities for the QoL-AGHDA in adult GHD," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 12(3), pages 243-252, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:15-16:p:2880-2888. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.