IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i13-14p2706-2716.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nurses' information practice in municipal health care—A web‐like landscape

Author

Listed:
  • Elisabeth Østensen
  • Line Kildal Bragstad
  • Nicholas R. Hardiker
  • Ragnhild Hellesø

Abstract

Aim To uncover the characteristics of nurses' information practice in municipal health care and to address how, when and why various pieces of information are produced, shared and managed. Background Nursing documentation in the electronic patient record has repeatedly been found unsatisfactory. Little is known about how the information practice of nurses in municipal health care actually is borne out. In order to understand why nursing documentation continues to fail at living up to the expected requirements, a better understanding of nurses' information practice is needed. Design A qualitative observational field study. The study complied with the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research. Methods Empirical data were collected in three Norwegian municipalities through participant observations and individual interviews with 17 registered nurses on regular day shifts. The data were analysed through thematic content analysis. Results Nurses' information practice in municipal health care can be described as complex. The complexity is reflected in four themes that emerged from the data: (1) web of information sources, (2) knowing the patient and information redundancy, (3) asynchronous information practice and (4) compensatory workarounds. Conclusions The complex and asynchronous nature of nurses' information practice affected both how and when information was produced, recorded and shared. When available systems lacked functions the nurses wanted, they created compensatory workarounds. Although electronic patient record was an important part of their information practice, nurses in long‐term care often knew their patients well, which meant that a lot of information about the patients was in their heads, and that searching for information in the electronic patient record sometimes seemed redundant. Relevance to clinical practice This study provides contextual knowledge that might be valuable (a) in the further development of information systems tailored to meet nurses' information needs and (b) when studying patient safety in relation to nurses' information practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Elisabeth Østensen & Line Kildal Bragstad & Nicholas R. Hardiker & Ragnhild Hellesø, 2019. "Nurses' information practice in municipal health care—A web‐like landscape," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(13-14), pages 2706-2716, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:13-14:p:2706-2716
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14873
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14873
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14873?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edith R Gjevjon & Ragnhild Hellesø, 2010. "The quality of home care nurses’ documentation in new electronic patient records," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(1‐2), pages 100-108, January.
    2. Tove Giske & Sunniva Nese Melås & Kari Anne Einarsen, 2018. "The art of oral handovers: A participant observational study by undergraduate students in a hospital setting," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5-6), pages 767-775, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Grete Vabo & Åshild Slettebø & Mariann Fossum, 2017. "Participants' perceptions of an intervention implemented in an Action Research Nursing Documentation Project," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(7-8), pages 983-993, April.
    2. Elisabeth Østensen & Nicholas R. Hardiker & Line Kildal Bragstad & Ragnhild Hellesø, 2020. "Introducing standardised care plans as a new recording tool in municipal health care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(17-18), pages 3286-3297, September.
    3. Sigrun Aasen Frigstad & Torunn Hatlen Nøst & Beate André, 2015. "Implementation of Free Text Format Nursing Diagnoses at a University Hospital’s Medical Department. Exploring Nurses’ and Nursing Students’ Experiences on Use and Usefulness. A Qualitative Study," Nursing Research and Practice, Hindawi, vol. 2015, pages 1-11, May.
    4. Kjellaug K. Myklebust & Stål Bjørkly & Målfrid Råheim, 2018. "Nursing documentation in inpatient psychiatry: The relevance of nurse–patient interactions in progress notes—A focus group study with mental health staff," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3-4), pages 611-622, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:13-14:p:2706-2716. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.